利用ChatGPT-4进行证据综合:在系统评价中使用大型语言模型的案例研究。

Federica Tomassini, Alice Luraschi, Stefano Patarnello, Carlotta Masciocchi, Giovanni Arcuri, Livia Lilli
{"title":"利用ChatGPT-4进行证据综合:在系统评价中使用大型语言模型的案例研究。","authors":"Federica Tomassini, Alice Luraschi, Stefano Patarnello, Carlotta Masciocchi, Giovanni Arcuri, Livia Lilli","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence, particularly Large Language Models (LLM) such as ChatGPT, is emerging as a potentially transformative support for traditionally complex and time-consuming Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs). In this study, we compared the traditional SLR process executed accordingly with Cochrane guidelines, with an AI-assisted approach using ChatGPT across various stages, from research question formulation to report writing. Effectiveness was assessed through quantitative measurements of time savings at each phase. Results showed substantial time reductions in several operational tasks, including Gantt chart, generating search terms and suggesting selection criteria. However, critical issues arose in stages requiring interpretative judgement, such as analyzing results, assessing risk of bias and final drafting. While AI cannot replace the role of the researcher, it is a valuable tool to optimize SLR workflow. The combination of human expertise and LLM capabilities presents a promising solution, provided it is accompanied by continuous development of AI systems to improve their reliability, transparency and interoperability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"332 ","pages":"22-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging ChatGPT-4 for Evidence Synthesis: A Case Study on the Use of a Large Language Model in a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Federica Tomassini, Alice Luraschi, Stefano Patarnello, Carlotta Masciocchi, Giovanni Arcuri, Livia Lilli\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SHTI251488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence, particularly Large Language Models (LLM) such as ChatGPT, is emerging as a potentially transformative support for traditionally complex and time-consuming Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs). In this study, we compared the traditional SLR process executed accordingly with Cochrane guidelines, with an AI-assisted approach using ChatGPT across various stages, from research question formulation to report writing. Effectiveness was assessed through quantitative measurements of time savings at each phase. Results showed substantial time reductions in several operational tasks, including Gantt chart, generating search terms and suggesting selection criteria. However, critical issues arose in stages requiring interpretative judgement, such as analyzing results, assessing risk of bias and final drafting. While AI cannot replace the role of the researcher, it is a valuable tool to optimize SLR workflow. The combination of human expertise and LLM capabilities presents a promising solution, provided it is accompanied by continuous development of AI systems to improve their reliability, transparency and interoperability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"volume\":\"332 \",\"pages\":\"22-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能,特别是像ChatGPT这样的大型语言模型(LLM),正在成为传统上复杂且耗时的系统文献综述(slr)的潜在变革性支持。在这项研究中,我们将传统的SLR过程与Cochrane指南进行了比较,并在从研究问题制定到报告撰写的各个阶段使用人工智能辅助方法ChatGPT。通过定量测量每个阶段节省的时间来评估有效性。结果显示,在几个操作任务中,包括甘特图、生成搜索条件和建议选择标准,大量的时间减少。然而,在需要解释性判断的阶段出现了关键问题,例如分析结果、评估偏见风险和最后起草。虽然人工智能不能取代研究人员的角色,但它是优化单反工作流程的宝贵工具。人类专业知识和法学硕士能力的结合提供了一个有前途的解决方案,前提是伴随着人工智能系统的不断发展,以提高其可靠性、透明度和互操作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging ChatGPT-4 for Evidence Synthesis: A Case Study on the Use of a Large Language Model in a Systematic Review.

Artificial intelligence, particularly Large Language Models (LLM) such as ChatGPT, is emerging as a potentially transformative support for traditionally complex and time-consuming Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs). In this study, we compared the traditional SLR process executed accordingly with Cochrane guidelines, with an AI-assisted approach using ChatGPT across various stages, from research question formulation to report writing. Effectiveness was assessed through quantitative measurements of time savings at each phase. Results showed substantial time reductions in several operational tasks, including Gantt chart, generating search terms and suggesting selection criteria. However, critical issues arose in stages requiring interpretative judgement, such as analyzing results, assessing risk of bias and final drafting. While AI cannot replace the role of the researcher, it is a valuable tool to optimize SLR workflow. The combination of human expertise and LLM capabilities presents a promising solution, provided it is accompanied by continuous development of AI systems to improve their reliability, transparency and interoperability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信