采用手术先入路的下颌前突患者的术后稳定性:使用透明矫正器与固定矫治器的术后正畸入路的影响

IF 3.2
Kyungmin Clara Lee
{"title":"采用手术先入路的下颌前突患者的术后稳定性:使用透明矫正器与固定矫治器的术后正畸入路的影响","authors":"Kyungmin Clara Lee","doi":"10.2319/022125-151.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effect of postsurgical orthodontic treatment between using clear aligners (CA) or fixed appliances (FA) on the postsurgical stability of patients with mandibular prognathism in the surgery-first approach (SFA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 54 patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent surgical orthodontic treatment with isolated mandibular setback surgery. The patients were divided into two groups according to the mechanics of postsurgical orthodontic treatment: the CA group included 27 patients treated with clear aligners, and the FA group included 27 patients treated with brackets during postoperative orthodontic treatment. Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken before, immediately after, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery to assess mandibular relapse. The measurements of postsurgical mandibular relapse including horizontal and vertical positions were compared according to the treatment progress and groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total postsurgical mandibular relapse at pogonion was 3.2 mm in the CA group and 2.2 mm in the FA group. Relapse was higher at 3 months postsurgery in both groups, with an average forward movement of 1.4 mm in the CA group and 1.7 mm in the FA group. Relapse in the CA group showed no significant changes over time, indicating persistence beyond the initial period. In contrast, the FA group showed a significant reduction in relapse by 3 months. Overall, the CA group tended to have greater and more persistent relapse than the FA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Careful consideration of skeletal relapse is needed in the postsurgical management of patients treated with clear aligners in SFA treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postsurgical stability in mandibular prognathism patients undergoing a surgery-first approach: influence of postoperative orthodontic approach using clear aligners vs fixed appliances.\",\"authors\":\"Kyungmin Clara Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2319/022125-151.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effect of postsurgical orthodontic treatment between using clear aligners (CA) or fixed appliances (FA) on the postsurgical stability of patients with mandibular prognathism in the surgery-first approach (SFA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 54 patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent surgical orthodontic treatment with isolated mandibular setback surgery. The patients were divided into two groups according to the mechanics of postsurgical orthodontic treatment: the CA group included 27 patients treated with clear aligners, and the FA group included 27 patients treated with brackets during postoperative orthodontic treatment. Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken before, immediately after, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery to assess mandibular relapse. The measurements of postsurgical mandibular relapse including horizontal and vertical positions were compared according to the treatment progress and groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total postsurgical mandibular relapse at pogonion was 3.2 mm in the CA group and 2.2 mm in the FA group. Relapse was higher at 3 months postsurgery in both groups, with an average forward movement of 1.4 mm in the CA group and 1.7 mm in the FA group. Relapse in the CA group showed no significant changes over time, indicating persistence beyond the initial period. In contrast, the FA group showed a significant reduction in relapse by 3 months. Overall, the CA group tended to have greater and more persistent relapse than the FA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Careful consideration of skeletal relapse is needed in the postsurgical management of patients treated with clear aligners in SFA treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2319/022125-151.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/022125-151.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较先手术入路(SFA)中使用透明矫正器(CA)或固定矫治器(FA)对下颌前突患者术后稳定性的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括54例接受外科正畸治疗的下颌前突患者。根据术后正畸治疗机制将患者分为两组:CA组27例患者在术后正畸治疗中使用透明矫正器,FA组27例患者在术后正畸治疗中使用托槽。在手术前、手术后、术后3、6、12个月进行锥形束计算机断层扫描,评估下颌复发。根据治疗进展及分组,比较术后下颌骨水平位和垂直位复发率。结果:CA组术后下颌骨总复发3.2 mm, FA组术后总复发2.2 mm。两组术后3个月复发率均较高,CA组平均前移1.4 mm, FA组平均前移1.7 mm。随着时间的推移,CA组的复发没有明显变化,表明持续超过初始期。相比之下,FA组在3个月后复发率显著降低。总的来说,CA组比FA组有更大更持久的复发。结论:在SFA治疗中使用透明矫正器的患者的术后处理中需要仔细考虑骨骼复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postsurgical stability in mandibular prognathism patients undergoing a surgery-first approach: influence of postoperative orthodontic approach using clear aligners vs fixed appliances.

Objectives: To compare the effect of postsurgical orthodontic treatment between using clear aligners (CA) or fixed appliances (FA) on the postsurgical stability of patients with mandibular prognathism in the surgery-first approach (SFA).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 54 patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent surgical orthodontic treatment with isolated mandibular setback surgery. The patients were divided into two groups according to the mechanics of postsurgical orthodontic treatment: the CA group included 27 patients treated with clear aligners, and the FA group included 27 patients treated with brackets during postoperative orthodontic treatment. Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken before, immediately after, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery to assess mandibular relapse. The measurements of postsurgical mandibular relapse including horizontal and vertical positions were compared according to the treatment progress and groups.

Results: Total postsurgical mandibular relapse at pogonion was 3.2 mm in the CA group and 2.2 mm in the FA group. Relapse was higher at 3 months postsurgery in both groups, with an average forward movement of 1.4 mm in the CA group and 1.7 mm in the FA group. Relapse in the CA group showed no significant changes over time, indicating persistence beyond the initial period. In contrast, the FA group showed a significant reduction in relapse by 3 months. Overall, the CA group tended to have greater and more persistent relapse than the FA group.

Conclusions: Careful consideration of skeletal relapse is needed in the postsurgical management of patients treated with clear aligners in SFA treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信