根据MDR第82条“其他临床研究”的风险管理-从EDITh计划中吸取的教训。

Ariadna Pérez Garriga, Stefan Wolking, Josua Kegele, Christian M Bosselmann, Beatrice Coldewey, Raphael W Majeed, Rainer Röhrig, Yvonne Weber, Myriam Lipprandt
{"title":"根据MDR第82条“其他临床研究”的风险管理-从EDITh计划中吸取的教训。","authors":"Ariadna Pérez Garriga, Stefan Wolking, Josua Kegele, Christian M Bosselmann, Beatrice Coldewey, Raphael W Majeed, Rainer Röhrig, Yvonne Weber, Myriam Lipprandt","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the implementation of the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), clinical trials of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) now often fall under Article 82 of the MDR. This mandates systematic risk management even for academic feasibility studies. This article presents a risk management strategy based on the EDiTh project, which evaluated a CDSS for epilepsy treatment recommendations in accordance with the 2023 S2k guideline First epileptic seizure and epilepsy in adulthood. A Preliminary Hazard Analysis and System Failure Mode and Effects Analysis identified key error types such as incorrect diagnoses or dosing recommendations. Due to the potential for catastrophic harm, a dual-visit study design was implemented, including a second, blinded expert consultation via videoconference to independently confirm diagnosis and treatment decisions. This design supports both risk mitigation and assessment of guideline adherence as the primary endpoint. The risk matrix and study setup illustrate how safety and regulatory requirements can be met in academic environments, while offering insights for future MDR-compliant investigations of digital health technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"332 ","pages":"2-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Management in \\\"Other Clinical Investigations\\\" According to Art. 82 MDR - Lessons Learnt from the EDITh Project.\",\"authors\":\"Ariadna Pérez Garriga, Stefan Wolking, Josua Kegele, Christian M Bosselmann, Beatrice Coldewey, Raphael W Majeed, Rainer Röhrig, Yvonne Weber, Myriam Lipprandt\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SHTI251484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the implementation of the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), clinical trials of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) now often fall under Article 82 of the MDR. This mandates systematic risk management even for academic feasibility studies. This article presents a risk management strategy based on the EDiTh project, which evaluated a CDSS for epilepsy treatment recommendations in accordance with the 2023 S2k guideline First epileptic seizure and epilepsy in adulthood. A Preliminary Hazard Analysis and System Failure Mode and Effects Analysis identified key error types such as incorrect diagnoses or dosing recommendations. Due to the potential for catastrophic harm, a dual-visit study design was implemented, including a second, blinded expert consultation via videoconference to independently confirm diagnosis and treatment decisions. This design supports both risk mitigation and assessment of guideline adherence as the primary endpoint. The risk matrix and study setup illustrate how safety and regulatory requirements can be met in academic environments, while offering insights for future MDR-compliant investigations of digital health technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"volume\":\"332 \",\"pages\":\"2-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着欧盟医疗器械法规(MDR)的实施,临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的临床试验现在通常属于MDR第82条。这就要求对学术可行性研究进行系统的风险管理。本文提出了一种基于EDiTh项目的风险管理策略,该项目根据2023 S2k指南对癫痫治疗建议的CDSS进行了评估。初步危害分析和系统故障模式及影响分析确定了关键错误类型,如不正确的诊断或剂量建议。由于潜在的灾难性伤害,实施了双访研究设计,包括通过视频会议进行第二次盲法专家咨询,以独立确认诊断和治疗决策。该设计支持风险缓解和指南依从性评估作为主要终点。风险矩阵和研究设置说明了如何在学术环境中满足安全和监管要求,同时为未来数字卫生技术的耐多药合规调查提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Management in "Other Clinical Investigations" According to Art. 82 MDR - Lessons Learnt from the EDITh Project.

With the implementation of the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), clinical trials of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) now often fall under Article 82 of the MDR. This mandates systematic risk management even for academic feasibility studies. This article presents a risk management strategy based on the EDiTh project, which evaluated a CDSS for epilepsy treatment recommendations in accordance with the 2023 S2k guideline First epileptic seizure and epilepsy in adulthood. A Preliminary Hazard Analysis and System Failure Mode and Effects Analysis identified key error types such as incorrect diagnoses or dosing recommendations. Due to the potential for catastrophic harm, a dual-visit study design was implemented, including a second, blinded expert consultation via videoconference to independently confirm diagnosis and treatment decisions. This design supports both risk mitigation and assessment of guideline adherence as the primary endpoint. The risk matrix and study setup illustrate how safety and regulatory requirements can be met in academic environments, while offering insights for future MDR-compliant investigations of digital health technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信