对生物医学知识网络的渴望:机遇、挑战和未来方向。

ArXiv Pub Date : 2025-09-26
Chunlei Wu, Hongfang Liu, Jason Flannick, Mark A Musen, Andrew I Su, Lawrence Hunter, Thomas M Powers, Cathy H Wu
{"title":"对生物医学知识网络的渴望:机遇、挑战和未来方向。","authors":"Chunlei Wu, Hongfang Liu, Jason Flannick, Mark A Musen, Andrew I Su, Lawrence Hunter, Thomas M Powers, Cathy H Wu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knowledge graphs, collectively as a knowledge network, have become critical tools for knowledge discovery in computable and explainable knowledge systems. Due to the semantic and structural complexities of biomedical data, these knowledge graphs need to enable dynamic reasoning over large evolving graphs and support fit-for-purpose abstraction, while establishing standards, preserving provenance and enforcing policy constraints for actionable discovery. A recent meeting of leading scientists discussed the opportunities, challenges and future directions of a biomedical knowledge network. Here we present six desiderata inspired by the meeting: (1) inference and reasoning in biomedical knowledge graphs need domain-centric approaches; (2) harmonized and accessible standards are required for knowledge graph representation and metadata; (3) robust validation of biomedical knowledge graphs needs multi-layered, context-aware approaches that are both rigorous and scalable; (4) the evolving and synergistic relationship between knowledge graphs and large language models is essential in empowering AI-driven biomedical discovery; (5) integrated development environments, public repositories, and governance frameworks are essential for secure and reproducible knowledge graph sharing; and (6) robust validation, provenance, and ethical governance are critical for trustworthy biomedical knowledge graphs. Addressing these key issues will be essential to realize the promises of a biomedical knowledge network in advancing biomedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":93888,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Desiderata for a biomedical knowledge network: opportunities, challenges and future Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Chunlei Wu, Hongfang Liu, Jason Flannick, Mark A Musen, Andrew I Su, Lawrence Hunter, Thomas M Powers, Cathy H Wu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Knowledge graphs, collectively as a knowledge network, have become critical tools for knowledge discovery in computable and explainable knowledge systems. Due to the semantic and structural complexities of biomedical data, these knowledge graphs need to enable dynamic reasoning over large evolving graphs and support fit-for-purpose abstraction, while establishing standards, preserving provenance and enforcing policy constraints for actionable discovery. A recent meeting of leading scientists discussed the opportunities, challenges and future directions of a biomedical knowledge network. Here we present six desiderata inspired by the meeting: (1) inference and reasoning in biomedical knowledge graphs need domain-centric approaches; (2) harmonized and accessible standards are required for knowledge graph representation and metadata; (3) robust validation of biomedical knowledge graphs needs multi-layered, context-aware approaches that are both rigorous and scalable; (4) the evolving and synergistic relationship between knowledge graphs and large language models is essential in empowering AI-driven biomedical discovery; (5) integrated development environments, public repositories, and governance frameworks are essential for secure and reproducible knowledge graph sharing; and (6) robust validation, provenance, and ethical governance are critical for trustworthy biomedical knowledge graphs. Addressing these key issues will be essential to realize the promises of a biomedical knowledge network in advancing biomedicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ArXiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ArXiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

知识图作为一个知识网络,已经成为可计算和可解释的知识系统中知识发现的重要工具。由于生物医学数据的语义和结构复杂性,这些知识图需要在大型演化图上进行动态推理,并支持适合目的的抽象,同时建立标准,保留来源并执行可操作发现的策略约束。最近的一次主要科学家会议讨论了生物医学知识网络的机遇、挑战和未来方向。在此,我们提出了受会议启发的六个期望:(1)生物医学知识图中的推理和推理需要以领域为中心的方法;(2)知识图表示和元数据需要统一的可访问标准;(3)生物医学知识图的鲁棒性验证需要多层、上下文感知的方法,这些方法既严格又可扩展;(4)知识图谱和大型语言模型之间不断发展的协同关系对于增强人工智能驱动的生物医学发现至关重要;(5)集成开发环境、公共存储库和治理框架对于安全和可复制的知识图谱共享至关重要;(6)稳健的验证、来源和伦理治理是值得信赖的生物医学知识图谱的关键。解决这些关键问题对于实现生物医学知识网络在推进生物医学方面的承诺至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Desiderata for a biomedical knowledge network: opportunities, challenges and future Directions.

Knowledge graphs, collectively as a knowledge network, have become critical tools for knowledge discovery in computable and explainable knowledge systems. Due to the semantic and structural complexities of biomedical data, these knowledge graphs need to enable dynamic reasoning over large evolving graphs and support fit-for-purpose abstraction, while establishing standards, preserving provenance and enforcing policy constraints for actionable discovery. A recent meeting of leading scientists discussed the opportunities, challenges and future directions of a biomedical knowledge network. Here we present six desiderata inspired by the meeting: (1) inference and reasoning in biomedical knowledge graphs need domain-centric approaches; (2) harmonized and accessible standards are required for knowledge graph representation and metadata; (3) robust validation of biomedical knowledge graphs needs multi-layered, context-aware approaches that are both rigorous and scalable; (4) the evolving and synergistic relationship between knowledge graphs and large language models is essential in empowering AI-driven biomedical discovery; (5) integrated development environments, public repositories, and governance frameworks are essential for secure and reproducible knowledge graph sharing; and (6) robust validation, provenance, and ethical governance are critical for trustworthy biomedical knowledge graphs. Addressing these key issues will be essential to realize the promises of a biomedical knowledge network in advancing biomedicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信