帕金森病患者视敏度和对比敏感度数字测量的有效性。

BMC digital health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1186/s44247-025-00195-z
Julia Das, Gillian Barry, Rodrigo Vitório, Richard Walker, Yunus Celik, Claire McDonald, Rosie Morris, Samuel Stuart
{"title":"帕金森病患者视敏度和对比敏感度数字测量的有效性。","authors":"Julia Das, Gillian Barry, Rodrigo Vitório, Richard Walker, Yunus Celik, Claire McDonald, Rosie Morris, Samuel Stuart","doi":"10.1186/s44247-025-00195-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Senaptec Sensory Station (SSS) is a device that can measure visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS), but validity has not been established in clinical populations. Therefore, we examined analytical and initial clinical validation of VA and CS measured via the SSS in Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SSS was used in 34 PD (aged 69.6 (SD = 9.4) years old) to measure VA (via visual clarity outcome) and CS (via SSS-CS6 and SSS-CS18 outcomes). Analytical validation was performed through comparison to reference VA and CS eye-charts (ETDRS VA, MARS CS), and clinical validation was performed through correlation with clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Difference in VA LogMar score between the reference eye chart and the SSS was - 0.03 (0.23); e.g., approximately a single letter on the eye chart. There was moderate agreement between the SSS and eye chart VA measurement in PD (ICC = 0.42). Additionally, there was moderate correlation between SSS and eye chart (0.8 cpd) CS measurement in PD, specifically for SSS-CS6 (6 cpd) (<i>r</i> = 0.46). However, there was poor correlation between eye chart and SSS-CS18 (18 cpd). SSS VA and CS measures correlated moderately with cognitive function, disease duration and severity, providing clinical validation evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VA and CS can be measured with SSS in PD with moderate comparability to reference eye charts (dependent on cpd for CS), and digital outcomes may provide clinically meaningful outcomes to use in PD trials. A range of human, technological and protocol factors may impact validity of VA and CS measurement via SSS, which should be further examined in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72426,"journal":{"name":"BMC digital health","volume":"3 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of digital measurement of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Das, Gillian Barry, Rodrigo Vitório, Richard Walker, Yunus Celik, Claire McDonald, Rosie Morris, Samuel Stuart\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44247-025-00195-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Senaptec Sensory Station (SSS) is a device that can measure visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS), but validity has not been established in clinical populations. Therefore, we examined analytical and initial clinical validation of VA and CS measured via the SSS in Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SSS was used in 34 PD (aged 69.6 (SD = 9.4) years old) to measure VA (via visual clarity outcome) and CS (via SSS-CS6 and SSS-CS18 outcomes). Analytical validation was performed through comparison to reference VA and CS eye-charts (ETDRS VA, MARS CS), and clinical validation was performed through correlation with clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Difference in VA LogMar score between the reference eye chart and the SSS was - 0.03 (0.23); e.g., approximately a single letter on the eye chart. There was moderate agreement between the SSS and eye chart VA measurement in PD (ICC = 0.42). Additionally, there was moderate correlation between SSS and eye chart (0.8 cpd) CS measurement in PD, specifically for SSS-CS6 (6 cpd) (<i>r</i> = 0.46). However, there was poor correlation between eye chart and SSS-CS18 (18 cpd). SSS VA and CS measures correlated moderately with cognitive function, disease duration and severity, providing clinical validation evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VA and CS can be measured with SSS in PD with moderate comparability to reference eye charts (dependent on cpd for CS), and digital outcomes may provide clinically meaningful outcomes to use in PD trials. A range of human, technological and protocol factors may impact validity of VA and CS measurement via SSS, which should be further examined in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC digital health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484281/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-025-00195-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-025-00195-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Senaptec感官站(SSS)是一种可以测量视力(VA)和对比敏感度(CS)的设备,但其有效性尚未在临床人群中建立。因此,我们检查了通过SSS测量帕金森病(PD)的VA和CS的分析和初步临床验证。方法:34例PD患者(年龄69.6 (SD = 9.4)岁)采用SSS测量VA(通过视觉清晰度结果)和CS(通过SSS- cs6和SSS- cs18结果)。通过对照参考VA和CS眼图(ETDRS VA、MARS CS)进行分析验证,通过与临床指标的相关性进行临床验证。结果:参考视力表与SSS的VA LogMar评分差异为- 0.03 (0.23);例如,在视力表上大约有一个字母。PD患者的SSS与视力表VA测量值有中等程度的一致性(ICC = 0.42)。此外,SSS与视力表(0.8 cpd)中PD的CS测量存在中度相关,特别是SSS- cs6 (6 cpd) (r = 0.46)。而视力表与SSS-CS18 (18 cpd)相关性较差。SSS VA和CS测量与认知功能、病程和严重程度中度相关,为临床验证提供了证据。结论:PD患者的VA和CS可以用SSS测量,与参考视力表具有中等可比性(CS依赖于cpd),数字结果可能为PD试验提供有临床意义的结果。一系列人为、技术和协议因素可能会影响通过SSS测量VA和CS的有效性,这需要在未来的研究中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of digital measurement of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's disease.

Purpose: The Senaptec Sensory Station (SSS) is a device that can measure visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS), but validity has not been established in clinical populations. Therefore, we examined analytical and initial clinical validation of VA and CS measured via the SSS in Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods: SSS was used in 34 PD (aged 69.6 (SD = 9.4) years old) to measure VA (via visual clarity outcome) and CS (via SSS-CS6 and SSS-CS18 outcomes). Analytical validation was performed through comparison to reference VA and CS eye-charts (ETDRS VA, MARS CS), and clinical validation was performed through correlation with clinical measures.

Results: Difference in VA LogMar score between the reference eye chart and the SSS was - 0.03 (0.23); e.g., approximately a single letter on the eye chart. There was moderate agreement between the SSS and eye chart VA measurement in PD (ICC = 0.42). Additionally, there was moderate correlation between SSS and eye chart (0.8 cpd) CS measurement in PD, specifically for SSS-CS6 (6 cpd) (r = 0.46). However, there was poor correlation between eye chart and SSS-CS18 (18 cpd). SSS VA and CS measures correlated moderately with cognitive function, disease duration and severity, providing clinical validation evidence.

Conclusion: VA and CS can be measured with SSS in PD with moderate comparability to reference eye charts (dependent on cpd for CS), and digital outcomes may provide clinically meaningful outcomes to use in PD trials. A range of human, technological and protocol factors may impact validity of VA and CS measurement via SSS, which should be further examined in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信