基于肠道微生物群治疗自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Weijie Sun, Liang Ma, Xiangnan Feng, Yi Fan, Yiduo Cai, Xiaoming Li
{"title":"基于肠道微生物群治疗自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Weijie Sun, Liang Ma, Xiangnan Feng, Yi Fan, Yiduo Cai, Xiaoming Li","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2565181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gut-brain axis is an emerging therapeutic target for neurodevelopmental conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, the overall efficacy of gut microbiome-based interventions remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, aimed to synthesize the evidence on these interventions. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from 1,080 records across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2024. Interventions included probiotics, prebiotics, dietary changes, and fecal transplants. Using random-effects models, pooled analysis showed a small but significant overall benefit of gut microbiota-based interventions (Standardized Mean Difference, SMD = -0.12; 95% Confidence Interval, CI: -0.19 to -0.04), with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 5.9%). Effects differed by disorder: ADHD demonstrated greater improvement (SMD = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.06; I<sup>2</sup> = 50.4%) compared to ASD (SMD = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.04; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Duration-specific effects emerged: 8-week interventions showed significant outcomes (SMD = -0.32; 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.06), while shorter or longer durations lacked significance. Acceptability analysis from eight studies revealed comparable dropout rates between intervention and control groups (ASD: Risk Ratio, RR = 1.002; ADHD: RR = 0.943), with no serious adverse events reported. Subgroup analyses identified participant age, diagnosis type, and geographic location as heterogeneity sources. Despite methodological limitations and small sample sizes, findings suggest gut microbiome modulation may offer a safe adjunctive therapy, particularly for ADHD, with optimal effects emerging at 8 weeks. The gut-brain axis appears promising for neurodevelopmental disorders, but current evidence remains preliminary. Future research should prioritize large-scale RCTs with standardized protocols, mechanistic investigations, and long-term follow-up to establish clinical guidelines and clarify biological pathways. Findings underscore the need to tailor interventions to specific disorders and optimize treatment duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of gut microbiota-based therapy for autism Spectrum Disorder and attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Weijie Sun, Liang Ma, Xiangnan Feng, Yi Fan, Yiduo Cai, Xiaoming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2025.2565181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The gut-brain axis is an emerging therapeutic target for neurodevelopmental conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, the overall efficacy of gut microbiome-based interventions remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, aimed to synthesize the evidence on these interventions. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from 1,080 records across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2024. Interventions included probiotics, prebiotics, dietary changes, and fecal transplants. Using random-effects models, pooled analysis showed a small but significant overall benefit of gut microbiota-based interventions (Standardized Mean Difference, SMD = -0.12; 95% Confidence Interval, CI: -0.19 to -0.04), with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 5.9%). Effects differed by disorder: ADHD demonstrated greater improvement (SMD = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.06; I<sup>2</sup> = 50.4%) compared to ASD (SMD = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.04; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Duration-specific effects emerged: 8-week interventions showed significant outcomes (SMD = -0.32; 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.06), while shorter or longer durations lacked significance. Acceptability analysis from eight studies revealed comparable dropout rates between intervention and control groups (ASD: Risk Ratio, RR = 1.002; ADHD: RR = 0.943), with no serious adverse events reported. Subgroup analyses identified participant age, diagnosis type, and geographic location as heterogeneity sources. Despite methodological limitations and small sample sizes, findings suggest gut microbiome modulation may offer a safe adjunctive therapy, particularly for ADHD, with optimal effects emerging at 8 weeks. The gut-brain axis appears promising for neurodevelopmental disorders, but current evidence remains preliminary. Future research should prioritize large-scale RCTs with standardized protocols, mechanistic investigations, and long-term follow-up to establish clinical guidelines and clarify biological pathways. Findings underscore the need to tailor interventions to specific disorders and optimize treatment duration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2565181\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2565181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肠脑轴是神经发育疾病如自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的新兴治疗靶点。然而,肠道微生物组干预的总体效果尚不清楚。本系统评价和荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目,旨在综合这些干预措施的证据。截至2024年8月,从PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane、PsycInfo、MEDLINE和ClinicalTrials.gov的1080条记录中确定了15项随机对照试验(rct)。干预措施包括益生菌、益生元、饮食改变和粪便移植。使用随机效应模型,合并分析显示,基于肠道微生物群的干预措施的总体效益虽小但显著(标准化平均差,SMD = -0.12; 95%置信区间,CI: -0.19至-0.04),异质性低(I2 = 5.9%)。不同障碍的效果不同:与ASD (SMD = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.15至0.04;I2 = 0%)相比,ADHD表现出更大的改善(SMD = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.42至-0.06;I2 = 50.4%)。持续时间特异性效应出现:8周干预显示出显著的结果(SMD = -0.32; 95% CI: -0.58至-0.06),而较短或较长的持续时间缺乏显著性。8项研究的可接受性分析显示,干预组和对照组之间的辍学率相当(ASD:风险比,RR = 1.002; ADHD: RR = 0.943),无严重不良事件报告。亚组分析确定参与者的年龄、诊断类型和地理位置为异质性来源。尽管方法上存在局限性,样本量也很小,但研究结果表明,肠道微生物组调节可能是一种安全的辅助疗法,特别是对多动症,在8周时效果最佳。肠-脑轴似乎有望治疗神经发育障碍,但目前的证据仍处于初步阶段。未来的研究应优先考虑采用标准化方案、机制调查和长期随访的大规模随机对照试验,以建立临床指南和阐明生物学途径。研究结果强调了针对特定疾病量身定制干预措施和优化治疗时间的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of gut microbiota-based therapy for autism Spectrum Disorder and attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The gut-brain axis is an emerging therapeutic target for neurodevelopmental conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, the overall efficacy of gut microbiome-based interventions remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, aimed to synthesize the evidence on these interventions. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from 1,080 records across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2024. Interventions included probiotics, prebiotics, dietary changes, and fecal transplants. Using random-effects models, pooled analysis showed a small but significant overall benefit of gut microbiota-based interventions (Standardized Mean Difference, SMD = -0.12; 95% Confidence Interval, CI: -0.19 to -0.04), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 5.9%). Effects differed by disorder: ADHD demonstrated greater improvement (SMD = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.06; I2 = 50.4%) compared to ASD (SMD = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.04; I2 = 0%). Duration-specific effects emerged: 8-week interventions showed significant outcomes (SMD = -0.32; 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.06), while shorter or longer durations lacked significance. Acceptability analysis from eight studies revealed comparable dropout rates between intervention and control groups (ASD: Risk Ratio, RR = 1.002; ADHD: RR = 0.943), with no serious adverse events reported. Subgroup analyses identified participant age, diagnosis type, and geographic location as heterogeneity sources. Despite methodological limitations and small sample sizes, findings suggest gut microbiome modulation may offer a safe adjunctive therapy, particularly for ADHD, with optimal effects emerging at 8 weeks. The gut-brain axis appears promising for neurodevelopmental disorders, but current evidence remains preliminary. Future research should prioritize large-scale RCTs with standardized protocols, mechanistic investigations, and long-term follow-up to establish clinical guidelines and clarify biological pathways. Findings underscore the need to tailor interventions to specific disorders and optimize treatment duration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信