Weijie Sun, Liang Ma, Xiangnan Feng, Yi Fan, Yiduo Cai, Xiaoming Li
{"title":"基于肠道微生物群治疗自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Weijie Sun, Liang Ma, Xiangnan Feng, Yi Fan, Yiduo Cai, Xiaoming Li","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2565181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gut-brain axis is an emerging therapeutic target for neurodevelopmental conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, the overall efficacy of gut microbiome-based interventions remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, aimed to synthesize the evidence on these interventions. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from 1,080 records across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2024. Interventions included probiotics, prebiotics, dietary changes, and fecal transplants. Using random-effects models, pooled analysis showed a small but significant overall benefit of gut microbiota-based interventions (Standardized Mean Difference, SMD = -0.12; 95% Confidence Interval, CI: -0.19 to -0.04), with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 5.9%). Effects differed by disorder: ADHD demonstrated greater improvement (SMD = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.06; I<sup>2</sup> = 50.4%) compared to ASD (SMD = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.04; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Duration-specific effects emerged: 8-week interventions showed significant outcomes (SMD = -0.32; 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.06), while shorter or longer durations lacked significance. Acceptability analysis from eight studies revealed comparable dropout rates between intervention and control groups (ASD: Risk Ratio, RR = 1.002; ADHD: RR = 0.943), with no serious adverse events reported. Subgroup analyses identified participant age, diagnosis type, and geographic location as heterogeneity sources. Despite methodological limitations and small sample sizes, findings suggest gut microbiome modulation may offer a safe adjunctive therapy, particularly for ADHD, with optimal effects emerging at 8 weeks. The gut-brain axis appears promising for neurodevelopmental disorders, but current evidence remains preliminary. Future research should prioritize large-scale RCTs with standardized protocols, mechanistic investigations, and long-term follow-up to establish clinical guidelines and clarify biological pathways. Findings underscore the need to tailor interventions to specific disorders and optimize treatment duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of gut microbiota-based therapy for autism Spectrum Disorder and attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Weijie Sun, Liang Ma, Xiangnan Feng, Yi Fan, Yiduo Cai, Xiaoming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2025.2565181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The gut-brain axis is an emerging therapeutic target for neurodevelopmental conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, the overall efficacy of gut microbiome-based interventions remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, aimed to synthesize the evidence on these interventions. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from 1,080 records across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2024. Interventions included probiotics, prebiotics, dietary changes, and fecal transplants. Using random-effects models, pooled analysis showed a small but significant overall benefit of gut microbiota-based interventions (Standardized Mean Difference, SMD = -0.12; 95% Confidence Interval, CI: -0.19 to -0.04), with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 5.9%). Effects differed by disorder: ADHD demonstrated greater improvement (SMD = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.06; I<sup>2</sup> = 50.4%) compared to ASD (SMD = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.04; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Duration-specific effects emerged: 8-week interventions showed significant outcomes (SMD = -0.32; 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.06), while shorter or longer durations lacked significance. Acceptability analysis from eight studies revealed comparable dropout rates between intervention and control groups (ASD: Risk Ratio, RR = 1.002; ADHD: RR = 0.943), with no serious adverse events reported. Subgroup analyses identified participant age, diagnosis type, and geographic location as heterogeneity sources. Despite methodological limitations and small sample sizes, findings suggest gut microbiome modulation may offer a safe adjunctive therapy, particularly for ADHD, with optimal effects emerging at 8 weeks. The gut-brain axis appears promising for neurodevelopmental disorders, but current evidence remains preliminary. Future research should prioritize large-scale RCTs with standardized protocols, mechanistic investigations, and long-term follow-up to establish clinical guidelines and clarify biological pathways. Findings underscore the need to tailor interventions to specific disorders and optimize treatment duration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2565181\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2565181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of gut microbiota-based therapy for autism Spectrum Disorder and attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The gut-brain axis is an emerging therapeutic target for neurodevelopmental conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, the overall efficacy of gut microbiome-based interventions remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, aimed to synthesize the evidence on these interventions. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from 1,080 records across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2024. Interventions included probiotics, prebiotics, dietary changes, and fecal transplants. Using random-effects models, pooled analysis showed a small but significant overall benefit of gut microbiota-based interventions (Standardized Mean Difference, SMD = -0.12; 95% Confidence Interval, CI: -0.19 to -0.04), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 5.9%). Effects differed by disorder: ADHD demonstrated greater improvement (SMD = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.06; I2 = 50.4%) compared to ASD (SMD = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.04; I2 = 0%). Duration-specific effects emerged: 8-week interventions showed significant outcomes (SMD = -0.32; 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.06), while shorter or longer durations lacked significance. Acceptability analysis from eight studies revealed comparable dropout rates between intervention and control groups (ASD: Risk Ratio, RR = 1.002; ADHD: RR = 0.943), with no serious adverse events reported. Subgroup analyses identified participant age, diagnosis type, and geographic location as heterogeneity sources. Despite methodological limitations and small sample sizes, findings suggest gut microbiome modulation may offer a safe adjunctive therapy, particularly for ADHD, with optimal effects emerging at 8 weeks. The gut-brain axis appears promising for neurodevelopmental disorders, but current evidence remains preliminary. Future research should prioritize large-scale RCTs with standardized protocols, mechanistic investigations, and long-term follow-up to establish clinical guidelines and clarify biological pathways. Findings underscore the need to tailor interventions to specific disorders and optimize treatment duration.
期刊介绍:
Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management.
For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.