{"title":"改良的两阶段鞘扩张器技术用于ICU患者周围插入中心导管的出血结局:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Ting-Chia Young, Kuang-Hua Cheng, Ying-Hung Tang, Tzu-Chun Wang, Kuan-Pen Yu","doi":"10.1177/11297298251376981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical complications remain common with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), particularly in critically ill patients. Given the need to minimise procedural complications, strategies for reducing bleeding during PICC placement are essential. This study evaluated the efficacy of a previously introduced two-stage technique in minimising insertion-related bleeding compared with the traditional modified Seldinger technique in ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 86 patients who underwent 92 PICC placements in the ICU of a tertiary university medical centre, between August 2022 and January 2025. Bleeding outcomes were assessed at three time points: 5 min, 30 min and within 24 h after insertion. Blood loss was evaluated semi-quantitatively based on the extent of gauze pad contamination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 56 were performed using the two-stage technique and 36 using the traditional method. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Bleeding incidence was significantly lower in the two-stage group at all time points. At 5 min post-insertion, 93% of the patients in the two-stage group had no visible or only minimal bleeding compared to 28% in the traditional group. At 30 min, 84% had no visible or only minimal bleeding compared with 14% (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the two-stage technique was independently associated with a reduced bleeding risk (OR, 0.019; 95% CI, 0.005-0.074; <i>p</i> < 0.001). An interaction analysis showed that aPTT significantly modified the association between technique and bleeding (OR, 20.519; 95% CI, 1.643-255.851; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified two-stage technique appears to be a feasible alternative to conventional PICC placement and was associated with reduced insertion-related bleeding in ICU patients. The technique also resulted in fewer dressing changes within 24 h, suggesting more stable haemostasis and potential improvements in ICU care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251376981"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bleeding outcomes of a modified two-stage sheath-dilator technique for peripherally inserted central catheter placement in ICU patients: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Chia Young, Kuang-Hua Cheng, Ying-Hung Tang, Tzu-Chun Wang, Kuan-Pen Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251376981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical complications remain common with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), particularly in critically ill patients. Given the need to minimise procedural complications, strategies for reducing bleeding during PICC placement are essential. This study evaluated the efficacy of a previously introduced two-stage technique in minimising insertion-related bleeding compared with the traditional modified Seldinger technique in ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 86 patients who underwent 92 PICC placements in the ICU of a tertiary university medical centre, between August 2022 and January 2025. Bleeding outcomes were assessed at three time points: 5 min, 30 min and within 24 h after insertion. Blood loss was evaluated semi-quantitatively based on the extent of gauze pad contamination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 56 were performed using the two-stage technique and 36 using the traditional method. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Bleeding incidence was significantly lower in the two-stage group at all time points. At 5 min post-insertion, 93% of the patients in the two-stage group had no visible or only minimal bleeding compared to 28% in the traditional group. At 30 min, 84% had no visible or only minimal bleeding compared with 14% (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the two-stage technique was independently associated with a reduced bleeding risk (OR, 0.019; 95% CI, 0.005-0.074; <i>p</i> < 0.001). An interaction analysis showed that aPTT significantly modified the association between technique and bleeding (OR, 20.519; 95% CI, 1.643-255.851; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified two-stage technique appears to be a feasible alternative to conventional PICC placement and was associated with reduced insertion-related bleeding in ICU patients. The technique also resulted in fewer dressing changes within 24 h, suggesting more stable haemostasis and potential improvements in ICU care quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251376981\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251376981\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251376981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bleeding outcomes of a modified two-stage sheath-dilator technique for peripherally inserted central catheter placement in ICU patients: A retrospective cohort study.
Background: Mechanical complications remain common with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), particularly in critically ill patients. Given the need to minimise procedural complications, strategies for reducing bleeding during PICC placement are essential. This study evaluated the efficacy of a previously introduced two-stage technique in minimising insertion-related bleeding compared with the traditional modified Seldinger technique in ICU patients.
Methods: This study included 86 patients who underwent 92 PICC placements in the ICU of a tertiary university medical centre, between August 2022 and January 2025. Bleeding outcomes were assessed at three time points: 5 min, 30 min and within 24 h after insertion. Blood loss was evaluated semi-quantitatively based on the extent of gauze pad contamination.
Results: In total, 56 were performed using the two-stage technique and 36 using the traditional method. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Bleeding incidence was significantly lower in the two-stage group at all time points. At 5 min post-insertion, 93% of the patients in the two-stage group had no visible or only minimal bleeding compared to 28% in the traditional group. At 30 min, 84% had no visible or only minimal bleeding compared with 14% (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the two-stage technique was independently associated with a reduced bleeding risk (OR, 0.019; 95% CI, 0.005-0.074; p < 0.001). An interaction analysis showed that aPTT significantly modified the association between technique and bleeding (OR, 20.519; 95% CI, 1.643-255.851; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The modified two-stage technique appears to be a feasible alternative to conventional PICC placement and was associated with reduced insertion-related bleeding in ICU patients. The technique also resulted in fewer dressing changes within 24 h, suggesting more stable haemostasis and potential improvements in ICU care quality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.