多媒体教育与标准教育方案在中心静脉导管长期使用自我管理中的有效性:一项系统综述。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Ines Basso, Safae El Motarajji, Manuela Ferrari, Chiara Airoldi, Angela Durante, Stefano Brovarone, Alessia Mariani, Alberto Dal Molin
{"title":"多媒体教育与标准教育方案在中心静脉导管长期使用自我管理中的有效性:一项系统综述。","authors":"Ines Basso, Safae El Motarajji, Manuela Ferrari, Chiara Airoldi, Angela Durante, Stefano Brovarone, Alessia Mariani, Alberto Dal Molin","doi":"10.1177/11297298251378618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of multimedia education compared to standard approaches for people with central venous access devices for long-term use. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL Complete until January 2025. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Ten studies were identified (832 patients), including six randomized controlled trials and four quasi-experimental studies. Seven multimedia educational programs used asynchronous methods (e.g. pre-recorded videos or presentations), while three employed synchronous approaches (e.g. tele-visits or virtual communities). Five studies assessed short-term knowledge, with two showing significant improvements and three reporting no differences. Skill acquisition improved in two studies. Cumulative catheter complications decreased in two studies, though findings on specific issues were mixed. These findings suggest potential benefits of multimedia education in patient care, but methodological limitations and study variability render the evidence inconclusive, underscoring the need for high-quality research.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251378618"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of a multimedia education versus a standard education program in the self-management of central venous catheters for long-term use: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ines Basso, Safae El Motarajji, Manuela Ferrari, Chiara Airoldi, Angela Durante, Stefano Brovarone, Alessia Mariani, Alberto Dal Molin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251378618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of multimedia education compared to standard approaches for people with central venous access devices for long-term use. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL Complete until January 2025. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Ten studies were identified (832 patients), including six randomized controlled trials and four quasi-experimental studies. Seven multimedia educational programs used asynchronous methods (e.g. pre-recorded videos or presentations), while three employed synchronous approaches (e.g. tele-visits or virtual communities). Five studies assessed short-term knowledge, with two showing significant improvements and three reporting no differences. Skill acquisition improved in two studies. Cumulative catheter complications decreased in two studies, though findings on specific issues were mixed. These findings suggest potential benefits of multimedia education in patient care, but methodological limitations and study variability render the evidence inconclusive, underscoring the need for high-quality research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251378618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251378618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251378618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述旨在评估多媒体教育与标准方法相比对长期使用中心静脉通路装置的患者的影响。我们系统地检索了PubMed, Embase和CINAHL Complete,直到2025年1月。两名独立审稿人进行了研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。纳入10项研究(832例患者),包括6项随机对照试验和4项准实验研究。7个多媒体教育项目采用异步方式(如预先录制的视频或演示),3个采用同步方式(如远程访问或虚拟社区)。五项研究评估了短期知识,其中两项显示有显著改善,三项报告没有差异。在两项研究中,技能习得得到了改善。在两项研究中,累积的导管并发症减少了,尽管在具体问题上的发现喜忧参半。这些发现提示了多媒体教育在患者护理中的潜在益处,但方法上的局限性和研究的可变性使得证据不具有结论性,强调了高质量研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effectiveness of a multimedia education versus a standard education program in the self-management of central venous catheters for long-term use: A systematic review.

This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of multimedia education compared to standard approaches for people with central venous access devices for long-term use. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL Complete until January 2025. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Ten studies were identified (832 patients), including six randomized controlled trials and four quasi-experimental studies. Seven multimedia educational programs used asynchronous methods (e.g. pre-recorded videos or presentations), while three employed synchronous approaches (e.g. tele-visits or virtual communities). Five studies assessed short-term knowledge, with two showing significant improvements and three reporting no differences. Skill acquisition improved in two studies. Cumulative catheter complications decreased in two studies, though findings on specific issues were mixed. These findings suggest potential benefits of multimedia education in patient care, but methodological limitations and study variability render the evidence inconclusive, underscoring the need for high-quality research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信