院前局部区域麻醉:一个病例系列。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Lorenzo Vizzolo, Cédric Luyet, Pierre Metrailler, Alexandre Moser
{"title":"院前局部区域麻醉:一个病例系列。","authors":"Lorenzo Vizzolo, Cédric Luyet, Pierre Metrailler, Alexandre Moser","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01460-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard prehospital pain management relies on opioids, which involved avoidable risks. Few studies have evaluated pre-hospital locoregional anesthesia (LRA), especially fascia iliaca compartment blocks (FICB) and femoral nerve blocks (FB). We aimed to analyze the safety and opioid sparing potential of LRA in a Swiss alpine Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis over 36 months. Variables recorded included type of block, ultrasound guidance, provider training, injury mechanism, diagnosis, patient data, on site time, pain scores evolution, complementary medication before/after LRA and complications. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric test were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight procedures were performed (0.26% of all missions): 25 FICB (89.3%) and 3 FB (10.7%). Ultrasound was used in 21.4% of cases (12% of FICBs, 100% of FBs). Ski accidents accounted for 64,3% and femoral diaphyseal fracture was suspected in 82,1%. Eight missions required hoisting, one terrestrial evacuation. Sixty percent 60.0% of blocs were performed by non-anesthesiologist. Only lidocaine 1% was used. Time on site was similar with or without ultrasound (p = 0.25). Pain score documentation (NRS) was incomplete in 50% but scores significantly decreased after LRA (p < 0.001). The need for complementary analgesic and or sedative was reduced (p = 0.025). Fentanyl use significantly decreased (p = 0.028), midazolam and ketamine did not (p = 0.16 and 0.56). No complications were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LRA appears effective and safe in prehospital (alpine) settings, providing substantial pain relief and reducing fentanyl use. Further studies are needed to investigate whether LRA protocols could reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital locoregional anesthesia: a case series.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Vizzolo, Cédric Luyet, Pierre Metrailler, Alexandre Moser\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13049-025-01460-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard prehospital pain management relies on opioids, which involved avoidable risks. Few studies have evaluated pre-hospital locoregional anesthesia (LRA), especially fascia iliaca compartment blocks (FICB) and femoral nerve blocks (FB). We aimed to analyze the safety and opioid sparing potential of LRA in a Swiss alpine Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis over 36 months. Variables recorded included type of block, ultrasound guidance, provider training, injury mechanism, diagnosis, patient data, on site time, pain scores evolution, complementary medication before/after LRA and complications. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric test were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight procedures were performed (0.26% of all missions): 25 FICB (89.3%) and 3 FB (10.7%). Ultrasound was used in 21.4% of cases (12% of FICBs, 100% of FBs). Ski accidents accounted for 64,3% and femoral diaphyseal fracture was suspected in 82,1%. Eight missions required hoisting, one terrestrial evacuation. Sixty percent 60.0% of blocs were performed by non-anesthesiologist. Only lidocaine 1% was used. Time on site was similar with or without ultrasound (p = 0.25). Pain score documentation (NRS) was incomplete in 50% but scores significantly decreased after LRA (p < 0.001). The need for complementary analgesic and or sedative was reduced (p = 0.025). Fentanyl use significantly decreased (p = 0.028), midazolam and ketamine did not (p = 0.16 and 0.56). No complications were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LRA appears effective and safe in prehospital (alpine) settings, providing substantial pain relief and reducing fentanyl use. Further studies are needed to investigate whether LRA protocols could reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492754/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01460-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01460-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

标准院前疼痛管理依赖于阿片类药物,这涉及可避免的风险。很少有研究评估院前局部区域麻醉(LRA),特别是筋膜髂室阻滞(FICB)和股神经阻滞(FB)。我们的目的是分析瑞士高山直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)中LRA的安全性和阿片类药物节约潜力。方法:回顾性分析36个月。记录的变量包括阻滞类型、超声引导、提供者培训、损伤机制、诊断、患者资料、现场时间、疼痛评分演变、LRA前后补充用药及并发症。采用描述性统计和非参数检验。结果:共完成28例手术(占全部手术的0.26%):FICB 25例(89.3%),FB 3例(10.7%)。21.4%的病例使用超声(12%的ficb, 100%的FBs)。滑雪事故占64.3%,股骨骨干骨折占82.1%。8个任务需要吊装,1个地面撤离。60% - 60.0%的阻滞由非麻醉医师进行。仅使用1%利多卡因。超声检查前后现场时间相似(p = 0.25)。50%的患者疼痛评分记录(NRS)不完整,但LRA后评分明显下降(p)。结论:LRA在院前(高山)环境中是有效和安全的,提供了实质性的疼痛缓解,减少了芬太尼的使用。需要进一步的研究来调查LRA方案是否可以降低阿片类药物相关的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prehospital locoregional anesthesia: a case series.

Background: Standard prehospital pain management relies on opioids, which involved avoidable risks. Few studies have evaluated pre-hospital locoregional anesthesia (LRA), especially fascia iliaca compartment blocks (FICB) and femoral nerve blocks (FB). We aimed to analyze the safety and opioid sparing potential of LRA in a Swiss alpine Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS).

Methods: Retrospective analysis over 36 months. Variables recorded included type of block, ultrasound guidance, provider training, injury mechanism, diagnosis, patient data, on site time, pain scores evolution, complementary medication before/after LRA and complications. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric test were used.

Results: Twenty-eight procedures were performed (0.26% of all missions): 25 FICB (89.3%) and 3 FB (10.7%). Ultrasound was used in 21.4% of cases (12% of FICBs, 100% of FBs). Ski accidents accounted for 64,3% and femoral diaphyseal fracture was suspected in 82,1%. Eight missions required hoisting, one terrestrial evacuation. Sixty percent 60.0% of blocs were performed by non-anesthesiologist. Only lidocaine 1% was used. Time on site was similar with or without ultrasound (p = 0.25). Pain score documentation (NRS) was incomplete in 50% but scores significantly decreased after LRA (p < 0.001). The need for complementary analgesic and or sedative was reduced (p = 0.025). Fentanyl use significantly decreased (p = 0.028), midazolam and ketamine did not (p = 0.16 and 0.56). No complications were documented.

Conclusions: LRA appears effective and safe in prehospital (alpine) settings, providing substantial pain relief and reducing fentanyl use. Further studies are needed to investigate whether LRA protocols could reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信