Natalia Hernández-Segura, Arrate Pinto-Carral, Diane D Allen, Alba Marcos-Delgado, Tania Fernández Villa, Antonio J Molina
{"title":"西班牙语运动能力量表的效度与信度:项目反应理论方法。","authors":"Natalia Hernández-Segura, Arrate Pinto-Carral, Diane D Allen, Alba Marcos-Delgado, Tania Fernández Villa, Antonio J Molina","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2566155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of movement capacity is fundamental in the field of physiotherapy to understand patient progress and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. The Movement Ability Measure (MAM) instrument is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess self-perceived movement capacity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate a Spanish version of the MAM instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-part study was designed, based on guidelines for the cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures: a phase for adaptation, involving 15 participants, and a phase for psychometric property analysis using Item Response Theory. The second phase included 205 subjects (49.9 ± 16.2 years, and 60.5% women). Structural validity was examined through the partial credit model. Reliability was estimated using the coefficient of reliability separation, test information function, and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) at one week. The association with the Physical Functioning Subscale was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients. Movement capacity across different groups was compared using Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney and Kruskal - Wallis tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Spanish version of the MAM instrument showed good fit indices, especially in the multidimensional model. The correlation with the Physical Functioning Subscale was 0.79 (<i>p</i> < .001), and the coefficient of reliability separation was 0.98. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.97). When analyzing differences between groups based on age, reported mobility issues, presence of chronic illness, and origin group, statistically significant differences were found according to prior hypotheses (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Spanish version of the MAM instrument is both reliable and valid for evaluating movement ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Spanish movement ability measure: an item response theory approach.\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Hernández-Segura, Arrate Pinto-Carral, Diane D Allen, Alba Marcos-Delgado, Tania Fernández Villa, Antonio J Molina\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2025.2566155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of movement capacity is fundamental in the field of physiotherapy to understand patient progress and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. The Movement Ability Measure (MAM) instrument is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess self-perceived movement capacity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate a Spanish version of the MAM instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-part study was designed, based on guidelines for the cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures: a phase for adaptation, involving 15 participants, and a phase for psychometric property analysis using Item Response Theory. The second phase included 205 subjects (49.9 ± 16.2 years, and 60.5% women). Structural validity was examined through the partial credit model. Reliability was estimated using the coefficient of reliability separation, test information function, and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) at one week. The association with the Physical Functioning Subscale was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients. Movement capacity across different groups was compared using Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney and Kruskal - Wallis tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Spanish version of the MAM instrument showed good fit indices, especially in the multidimensional model. The correlation with the Physical Functioning Subscale was 0.79 (<i>p</i> < .001), and the coefficient of reliability separation was 0.98. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.97). When analyzing differences between groups based on age, reported mobility issues, presence of chronic illness, and origin group, statistically significant differences were found according to prior hypotheses (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Spanish version of the MAM instrument is both reliable and valid for evaluating movement ability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2566155\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2566155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:运动能力评估是物理治疗领域了解患者进展和治疗干预效果的基础。运动能力测量(MAM)是一种自我报告的问卷,旨在评估自我感知的运动能力。目的:验证西班牙语版本的MAM仪器。方法:根据患者报告结果测量的文化适应指南,设计了一项分为两部分的研究:适应阶段,包括15名参与者,以及使用项目反应理论进行心理测量属性分析的阶段。第二阶段纳入205名受试者(49.9±16.2岁,其中60.5%为女性)。通过部分信用模型检验结构效度。信度采用信度分离系数、测试信息函数和一周重测信度(类内相关系数)估计。使用Spearman相关系数评估与身体功能量表的关联。采用Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney和Kruskal - Wallis检验比较不同组的运动能力。结果:西班牙语版MAM仪器具有较好的拟合指标,尤其是多维模型。结论:西班牙语版MAM量表对运动能力的评价是可靠、有效的。
Validity and reliability of the Spanish movement ability measure: an item response theory approach.
Background: Assessment of movement capacity is fundamental in the field of physiotherapy to understand patient progress and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. The Movement Ability Measure (MAM) instrument is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess self-perceived movement capacity.
Objective: To validate a Spanish version of the MAM instrument.
Methods: A two-part study was designed, based on guidelines for the cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures: a phase for adaptation, involving 15 participants, and a phase for psychometric property analysis using Item Response Theory. The second phase included 205 subjects (49.9 ± 16.2 years, and 60.5% women). Structural validity was examined through the partial credit model. Reliability was estimated using the coefficient of reliability separation, test information function, and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) at one week. The association with the Physical Functioning Subscale was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients. Movement capacity across different groups was compared using Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney and Kruskal - Wallis tests.
Results: The Spanish version of the MAM instrument showed good fit indices, especially in the multidimensional model. The correlation with the Physical Functioning Subscale was 0.79 (p < .001), and the coefficient of reliability separation was 0.98. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.97). When analyzing differences between groups based on age, reported mobility issues, presence of chronic illness, and origin group, statistically significant differences were found according to prior hypotheses (p < .001).
Conclusion: The Spanish version of the MAM instrument is both reliable and valid for evaluating movement ability.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.