{"title":"医疗器械自我效能量表编制研究:效度与信度研究。","authors":"Züleyha Gürdap, Zeliha Cengiz","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Medical Device Self-Efficacy Scale among nursing students. The scale assesses perceived competence in using medical devices and supports identifying educational needs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study used an exploratory methodological design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted with 127 final-year nursing students between April and October 2023. Students completed the scale for three medical devices: a bedside monitor, an infusion pump, and a suction device. Content validity, construct validity, and criterion validity were evaluated. Construct validity was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, while reliability was assessed through Cronbach's α, item-total correlations, and test-retest methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The scale demonstrated good content validity with an index of 0.84. Exploratory factor analysis showed the scale is unidimensional with 12 items. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values for each device exceeded 0.85, and the proportion of explained variance was above 65%. Factor loadings ranged from 0.602 to 0.899. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit for the hypothesized model (χ² = 103.637 to 183.4; χ²/df = 2.159 to 3.987; root mean square error of approximation = 0.065 to 0.076; goodness of fit index = 0.901 to 0.902; cognitive flexibility inventory = 0.918 to 0.957; normed fit index = 0.901 to 0.923; incremental fit index = 0.919 to 0.957). Reliability analyses showed that Cronbach's α coefficients were above 0.90, and high test-retest correlation coefficients further supported the scale's reliability (r = 0.744 to 0.795; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 12-item scale is reliable and valid for assessing nursing students' perceived competencies with medical devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development Study of the Medical Device Self-Efficacy Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study.\",\"authors\":\"Züleyha Gürdap, Zeliha Cengiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Medical Device Self-Efficacy Scale among nursing students. The scale assesses perceived competence in using medical devices and supports identifying educational needs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study used an exploratory methodological design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted with 127 final-year nursing students between April and October 2023. Students completed the scale for three medical devices: a bedside monitor, an infusion pump, and a suction device. Content validity, construct validity, and criterion validity were evaluated. Construct validity was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, while reliability was assessed through Cronbach's α, item-total correlations, and test-retest methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The scale demonstrated good content validity with an index of 0.84. Exploratory factor analysis showed the scale is unidimensional with 12 items. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values for each device exceeded 0.85, and the proportion of explained variance was above 65%. Factor loadings ranged from 0.602 to 0.899. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit for the hypothesized model (χ² = 103.637 to 183.4; χ²/df = 2.159 to 3.987; root mean square error of approximation = 0.065 to 0.076; goodness of fit index = 0.901 to 0.902; cognitive flexibility inventory = 0.918 to 0.957; normed fit index = 0.901 to 0.923; incremental fit index = 0.919 to 0.957). Reliability analyses showed that Cronbach's α coefficients were above 0.90, and high test-retest correlation coefficients further supported the scale's reliability (r = 0.744 to 0.795; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 12-item scale is reliable and valid for assessing nursing students' perceived competencies with medical devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development Study of the Medical Device Self-Efficacy Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study.
Purpose: This study aims to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Medical Device Self-Efficacy Scale among nursing students. The scale assesses perceived competence in using medical devices and supports identifying educational needs.
Design: The study used an exploratory methodological design.
Methods: The study was conducted with 127 final-year nursing students between April and October 2023. Students completed the scale for three medical devices: a bedside monitor, an infusion pump, and a suction device. Content validity, construct validity, and criterion validity were evaluated. Construct validity was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, while reliability was assessed through Cronbach's α, item-total correlations, and test-retest methods.
Findings: The scale demonstrated good content validity with an index of 0.84. Exploratory factor analysis showed the scale is unidimensional with 12 items. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values for each device exceeded 0.85, and the proportion of explained variance was above 65%. Factor loadings ranged from 0.602 to 0.899. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit for the hypothesized model (χ² = 103.637 to 183.4; χ²/df = 2.159 to 3.987; root mean square error of approximation = 0.065 to 0.076; goodness of fit index = 0.901 to 0.902; cognitive flexibility inventory = 0.918 to 0.957; normed fit index = 0.901 to 0.923; incremental fit index = 0.919 to 0.957). Reliability analyses showed that Cronbach's α coefficients were above 0.90, and high test-retest correlation coefficients further supported the scale's reliability (r = 0.744 to 0.795; P < .001).
Conclusions: The 12-item scale is reliable and valid for assessing nursing students' perceived competencies with medical devices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.