初步证据支持阿片类药物长期护理适当使用评估的有效性和可靠性。

Q2 Medicine
Barbara Resnick, Rachel McPherson, Sorah Levy, Nayeon Kim, Elizabeth Galik
{"title":"初步证据支持阿片类药物长期护理适当使用评估的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Barbara Resnick, Rachel McPherson, Sorah Levy, Nayeon Kim, Elizabeth Galik","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2025.412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the 10-item Assessment for the Appropriate Use of Opioids in Long-Term Care. <b>Design</b> This analysis utilized baseline data from the study titled Testing the Pain Clinical Practice Guideline Using the Evidence Integration Triangle. <b>Setting</b> Six nursing homes were included in the study.Residents: Residents were eligible if they were 65 years of age or older and had evidence of pain or were receiving treatment for pain. The sample included 24 residents who were on opioid medications. <b>Intervention/Procedure</b> The authors collected data from electronic health records using research evaluators. Evidence of validity was established based on the internal structure of the measure and its relationship to other variables. Reliability was assessed through item reliability and internal consistency. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b> Descriptive variables included age, cognitive status, comorbidities, race, ethnicity, marital status, and education. Pain assessment was based on the Minimum Data Set: (1) a verbal response item and (2) four objective items. The Assessment for Appropriate Use of Opioids in Long-Term Care consists of 10 items evaluating the appropriate use of opioids. <b>Results</b> The mean age of the residents was 71.8 years (SD = 9.9). The majority were female (62%), White (54%), and non-Hispanic (92%). Evidence of validity was observed based on the internal structure of the measure, item fit, and associations with other variables. Reliability was supported by internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. <b>Conclusions</b> The study provided preliminary evidence of validity and reliability; however, future testing is needed with a larger, more heterogeneous sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"40 10","pages":"412-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Evidence Supporting Validity and Reliability of the Assessment for Appropriate Use of Opioids for Long-Term Care.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Resnick, Rachel McPherson, Sorah Levy, Nayeon Kim, Elizabeth Galik\",\"doi\":\"10.4140/TCP.n.2025.412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b> This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the 10-item Assessment for the Appropriate Use of Opioids in Long-Term Care. <b>Design</b> This analysis utilized baseline data from the study titled Testing the Pain Clinical Practice Guideline Using the Evidence Integration Triangle. <b>Setting</b> Six nursing homes were included in the study.Residents: Residents were eligible if they were 65 years of age or older and had evidence of pain or were receiving treatment for pain. The sample included 24 residents who were on opioid medications. <b>Intervention/Procedure</b> The authors collected data from electronic health records using research evaluators. Evidence of validity was established based on the internal structure of the measure and its relationship to other variables. Reliability was assessed through item reliability and internal consistency. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b> Descriptive variables included age, cognitive status, comorbidities, race, ethnicity, marital status, and education. Pain assessment was based on the Minimum Data Set: (1) a verbal response item and (2) four objective items. The Assessment for Appropriate Use of Opioids in Long-Term Care consists of 10 items evaluating the appropriate use of opioids. <b>Results</b> The mean age of the residents was 71.8 years (SD = 9.9). The majority were female (62%), White (54%), and non-Hispanic (92%). Evidence of validity was observed based on the internal structure of the measure, item fit, and associations with other variables. Reliability was supported by internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. <b>Conclusions</b> The study provided preliminary evidence of validity and reliability; however, future testing is needed with a larger, more heterogeneous sample.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Senior Care Pharmacist\",\"volume\":\"40 10\",\"pages\":\"412-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Senior Care Pharmacist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2025.412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2025.412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在为长期护理中阿片类药物合理使用10项评估的效度和信度提供初步证据。设计本分析利用了题为“使用证据整合三角检验疼痛临床实践指南”的研究中的基线数据。六家养老院参与了这项研究。住院医师:65岁以上且有疼痛症状或正在接受疼痛治疗的住院医师符合条件。样本包括24名服用阿片类药物的居民。干预/程序作者使用研究评估器从电子健康记录中收集数据。效度的证据是根据测量的内部结构及其与其他变量的关系建立的。信度通过项目信度和内部一致性进行评估。描述变量包括年龄、认知状况、合并症、种族、民族、婚姻状况和教育程度。疼痛评估基于最小数据集:(1)一个口头反应项目和(2)四个客观项目。长期护理中阿片类药物适当使用评估包括10个项目,评估阿片类药物的适当使用。结果居民平均年龄71.8岁(SD = 9.9)。大多数是女性(62%)、白人(54%)和非西班牙裔(92%)。效度的证据是根据测量的内部结构、项目拟合和与其他变量的关联来观察的。信度由内部一致性和间信度支持。结论本研究提供了初步的效度和信度证据;然而,未来的测试需要更大,更异构的样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary Evidence Supporting Validity and Reliability of the Assessment for Appropriate Use of Opioids for Long-Term Care.

Objective This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the 10-item Assessment for the Appropriate Use of Opioids in Long-Term Care. Design This analysis utilized baseline data from the study titled Testing the Pain Clinical Practice Guideline Using the Evidence Integration Triangle. Setting Six nursing homes were included in the study.Residents: Residents were eligible if they were 65 years of age or older and had evidence of pain or were receiving treatment for pain. The sample included 24 residents who were on opioid medications. Intervention/Procedure The authors collected data from electronic health records using research evaluators. Evidence of validity was established based on the internal structure of the measure and its relationship to other variables. Reliability was assessed through item reliability and internal consistency. Main Outcome Measures Descriptive variables included age, cognitive status, comorbidities, race, ethnicity, marital status, and education. Pain assessment was based on the Minimum Data Set: (1) a verbal response item and (2) four objective items. The Assessment for Appropriate Use of Opioids in Long-Term Care consists of 10 items evaluating the appropriate use of opioids. Results The mean age of the residents was 71.8 years (SD = 9.9). The majority were female (62%), White (54%), and non-Hispanic (92%). Evidence of validity was observed based on the internal structure of the measure, item fit, and associations with other variables. Reliability was supported by internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. Conclusions The study provided preliminary evidence of validity and reliability; however, future testing is needed with a larger, more heterogeneous sample.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信