远程皮肤科诊断准确性:一项比较三种图像采集技术的随机队列研究。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijta/5789165
Serena Saade, Dana Maria Khoury, William Abou Shahla, Carla Stephan, Nicole Charbel, Ronny Joukhdar, Martine El Bejjani, Mira Bekdache, Sara Mansour, Dana Saade
{"title":"远程皮肤科诊断准确性:一项比较三种图像采集技术的随机队列研究。","authors":"Serena Saade, Dana Maria Khoury, William Abou Shahla, Carla Stephan, Nicole Charbel, Ronny Joukhdar, Martine El Bejjani, Mira Bekdache, Sara Mansour, Dana Saade","doi":"10.1155/ijta/5789165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teledermatology is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool for expanding access to dermatologic care, particularly in underserved and remote settings. This randomized prospective cohort study, the first of its kind in the region, examined the diagnostic and treatment concordance of teledermatologists compared to in-clinic dermatologists, with a focus on the impact of image acquisition methods. A total of 360 adult patients presenting for dermatologic evaluation at the American University of Beirut Medical Center were enrolled. Each patient contributed three sets of skin lesion photographs: unassisted patient-taken, assisted patient-taken after brief standardized training, and resident-taken under clinical conditions. Using a store-and-forward model, teledermatologists reviewed one randomized image set per patient. Their diagnoses and treatment decisions were compared to in-person assessments, which served as the reference standard. Diagnostic concordance improved with image quality: 79% for unassisted patient images, 84% for assisted images, and 87% for resident-taken images. Treatment concordance similarly increased from 38% to 44% to 45%, while the need to request additional history declined from 64% to 47%. Acne showed the highest diagnostic match across all image types. These findings support the clinical validity of store-and-forward teledermatology and highlight the value of patient education in improving image quality and diagnostic outcomes. As the first regional study to systematically evaluate real-world image acquisition methods, it offers a practical roadmap for integrating teledermatology into routine dermatologic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45630,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5789165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teledermatology Diagnostic Accuracy: A Randomized Cohort Study Comparing Three Image Acquisition Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Serena Saade, Dana Maria Khoury, William Abou Shahla, Carla Stephan, Nicole Charbel, Ronny Joukhdar, Martine El Bejjani, Mira Bekdache, Sara Mansour, Dana Saade\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijta/5789165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Teledermatology is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool for expanding access to dermatologic care, particularly in underserved and remote settings. This randomized prospective cohort study, the first of its kind in the region, examined the diagnostic and treatment concordance of teledermatologists compared to in-clinic dermatologists, with a focus on the impact of image acquisition methods. A total of 360 adult patients presenting for dermatologic evaluation at the American University of Beirut Medical Center were enrolled. Each patient contributed three sets of skin lesion photographs: unassisted patient-taken, assisted patient-taken after brief standardized training, and resident-taken under clinical conditions. Using a store-and-forward model, teledermatologists reviewed one randomized image set per patient. Their diagnoses and treatment decisions were compared to in-person assessments, which served as the reference standard. Diagnostic concordance improved with image quality: 79% for unassisted patient images, 84% for assisted images, and 87% for resident-taken images. Treatment concordance similarly increased from 38% to 44% to 45%, while the need to request additional history declined from 64% to 47%. Acne showed the highest diagnostic match across all image types. These findings support the clinical validity of store-and-forward teledermatology and highlight the value of patient education in improving image quality and diagnostic outcomes. As the first regional study to systematically evaluate real-world image acquisition methods, it offers a practical roadmap for integrating teledermatology into routine dermatologic care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"5789165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488292/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijta/5789165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijta/5789165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

远程皮肤病学越来越被认为是扩大获得皮肤护理的宝贵工具,特别是在服务不足和偏远地区。这项随机前瞻性队列研究是该地区首个此类研究,研究了远程皮肤科医生与临床皮肤科医生的诊断和治疗一致性,重点研究了图像采集方法的影响。在贝鲁特美国大学医学中心接受皮肤科评估的360名成年患者被纳入研究。每位患者提供三组皮肤病变照片:非辅助患者拍摄,经过简短标准化培训后辅助患者拍摄,以及临床条件下住院医师拍摄。使用存储转发模型,远程皮肤科医生对每位患者随机检查一组图像。他们的诊断和治疗决定与现场评估进行比较,作为参考标准。诊断一致性随着图像质量的提高而提高:无辅助患者图像的一致性为79%,辅助图像的一致性为84%,住院医生拍摄的图像一致性为87%。治疗一致性同样从38%增加到44%到45%,而要求额外病史的需求从64%下降到47%。痤疮在所有图像类型中显示出最高的诊断匹配。这些发现支持了存储转发远程皮肤病学的临床有效性,并强调了患者教育在提高图像质量和诊断结果方面的价值。作为第一个系统评估真实世界图像采集方法的区域研究,它为将远程皮肤科纳入常规皮肤科护理提供了一个实用的路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teledermatology Diagnostic Accuracy: A Randomized Cohort Study Comparing Three Image Acquisition Techniques.

Teledermatology is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool for expanding access to dermatologic care, particularly in underserved and remote settings. This randomized prospective cohort study, the first of its kind in the region, examined the diagnostic and treatment concordance of teledermatologists compared to in-clinic dermatologists, with a focus on the impact of image acquisition methods. A total of 360 adult patients presenting for dermatologic evaluation at the American University of Beirut Medical Center were enrolled. Each patient contributed three sets of skin lesion photographs: unassisted patient-taken, assisted patient-taken after brief standardized training, and resident-taken under clinical conditions. Using a store-and-forward model, teledermatologists reviewed one randomized image set per patient. Their diagnoses and treatment decisions were compared to in-person assessments, which served as the reference standard. Diagnostic concordance improved with image quality: 79% for unassisted patient images, 84% for assisted images, and 87% for resident-taken images. Treatment concordance similarly increased from 38% to 44% to 45%, while the need to request additional history declined from 64% to 47%. Acne showed the highest diagnostic match across all image types. These findings support the clinical validity of store-and-forward teledermatology and highlight the value of patient education in improving image quality and diagnostic outcomes. As the first regional study to systematically evaluate real-world image acquisition methods, it offers a practical roadmap for integrating teledermatology into routine dermatologic care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The overall aim of the International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications is to bring together science and applications of medical practice and medical care at a distance as well as their supporting technologies such as, computing, communications, and networking technologies with emphasis on telemedicine techniques and telemedicine applications. It is directed at practicing engineers, academic researchers, as well as doctors, nurses, etc. Telemedicine is an information technology that enables doctors to perform medical consultations, diagnoses, and treatments, as well as medical education, away from patients. For example, doctors can remotely examine patients via remote viewing monitors and sound devices, and/or sampling physiological data using telecommunication. Telemedicine technology is applied to areas of emergency healthcare, videoconsulting, telecardiology, telepathology, teledermatology, teleophthalmology, teleoncology, telepsychiatry, teledentistry, etc. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications will highlight the continued growth and new challenges in telemedicine, applications, and their supporting technologies, for both application development and basic research. Papers should emphasize original results or case studies relating to the theory and/or applications of telemedicine. Tutorial papers, especially those emphasizing multidisciplinary views of telemedicine, are also welcome. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications employs a paperless, electronic submission and evaluation system to promote a rapid turnaround in the peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信