成人术前焦虑的非药物治疗:一项系统综述。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sheng Sui, Lei Bao, Liqun Zhu, Yu Tang, Su Gu, Yuanyuan Mi, Xiaoyun Han, Li Li
{"title":"成人术前焦虑的非药物治疗:一项系统综述。","authors":"Sheng Sui, Lei Bao, Liqun Zhu, Yu Tang, Su Gu, Yuanyuan Mi, Xiaoyun Han, Li Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to synthesize and evaluate the best available evidence on nonpharmacological strategies for managing preoperative anxiety in adults using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) evidence-based framework.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we developed clinical questions and conducted comprehensive searches in guideline repositories, including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, and YimaiTong Clinical Guidelines. Additionally, we searched evidence databases, including the JBI Database, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and two major Chinese-language databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang. Eligible evidence types included clinical guidelines, evidence-based texts, evidence summaries, best practice recommendations, and systematic reviews. The JBI quality appraisal tools, evidence preclassification system, and evidence recommendation grading framework were applied to assess the quality of the literature, extract and synthesize content, and classify the evidence.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 38 pieces of best evidence were extracted from 26 studies. The evidence was categorized into five dimensions: basic characteristics of preoperative anxiety, screening and evaluation, nonpharmacological prevention, nonpharmacological intervention, and outcome evaluation. Among them, 26 pieces of evidence were graded as Level I, 1 as Level II, 2 as Level III, and 9 as Level V. Regarding recommendation strength, 24 pieces of evidence were rated as strong (Grade A) and 14 as weak (Grade B).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Various nonpharmacological strategies-such as screening, evaluation, patient education, cognitive behavioral therapy, and relaxation techniques-have demonstrated considerable effectiveness in reducing preoperative anxiety and improving patient outcomes. This study recommends that practitioners refer to this evidence summary, conduct a clinical audit of current practices in their institutions, and implement systematic quality improvements based on the best available evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonpharmacological Management of Preoperative Anxiety in Adults: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sheng Sui, Lei Bao, Liqun Zhu, Yu Tang, Su Gu, Yuanyuan Mi, Xiaoyun Han, Li Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to synthesize and evaluate the best available evidence on nonpharmacological strategies for managing preoperative anxiety in adults using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) evidence-based framework.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we developed clinical questions and conducted comprehensive searches in guideline repositories, including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, and YimaiTong Clinical Guidelines. Additionally, we searched evidence databases, including the JBI Database, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and two major Chinese-language databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang. Eligible evidence types included clinical guidelines, evidence-based texts, evidence summaries, best practice recommendations, and systematic reviews. The JBI quality appraisal tools, evidence preclassification system, and evidence recommendation grading framework were applied to assess the quality of the literature, extract and synthesize content, and classify the evidence.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 38 pieces of best evidence were extracted from 26 studies. The evidence was categorized into five dimensions: basic characteristics of preoperative anxiety, screening and evaluation, nonpharmacological prevention, nonpharmacological intervention, and outcome evaluation. Among them, 26 pieces of evidence were graded as Level I, 1 as Level II, 2 as Level III, and 9 as Level V. Regarding recommendation strength, 24 pieces of evidence were rated as strong (Grade A) and 14 as weak (Grade B).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Various nonpharmacological strategies-such as screening, evaluation, patient education, cognitive behavioral therapy, and relaxation techniques-have demonstrated considerable effectiveness in reducing preoperative anxiety and improving patient outcomes. This study recommends that practitioners refer to this evidence summary, conduct a clinical audit of current practices in their institutions, and implement systematic quality improvements based on the best available evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述旨在综合和评估使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)循证框架管理成人术前焦虑的非药物策略的最佳证据。设计:系统回顾。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,我们开发了临床问题,并在指南库中进行了全面搜索,包括UpToDate、BMJ最佳实践、美国麻醉师学会、围手术期注册护士协会、国家指南信息中心、安大略省注册护士协会、国家健康与护理卓越研究所、苏格兰校际指南网络、《益脉通临床指南》。此外,我们检索了证据数据库,包括JBI数据库、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、护理与相关健康文献累积索引、PsycINFO,以及两个主要的中文数据库:中国知识基础设施和万方数据库。符合条件的证据类型包括临床指南、循证文本、证据摘要、最佳实践建议和系统评价。应用JBI质量评价工具、证据预分类系统和证据推荐分级框架对文献质量进行评价,提取和综合内容,并对证据进行分类。结果:从26项研究中提取了38条最佳证据。证据分为五个维度:术前焦虑的基本特征、筛查和评估、非药物预防、非药物干预和结果评估。其中,ⅰ级证据26条,ⅱ级证据1条,ⅲ级证据2条,ⅴ级证据9条。推荐强度方面,强证据24条(A级),弱证据14条(B级)。结论:各种非药物策略,如筛查、评估、患者教育、认知行为治疗和放松技术,已证明在减少术前焦虑和改善患者预后方面相当有效。本研究建议从业人员参考该证据摘要,对其机构当前的实践进行临床审计,并根据现有的最佳证据实施系统的质量改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonpharmacological Management of Preoperative Anxiety in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to synthesize and evaluate the best available evidence on nonpharmacological strategies for managing preoperative anxiety in adults using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) evidence-based framework.

Design: Systematic review.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we developed clinical questions and conducted comprehensive searches in guideline repositories, including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, and YimaiTong Clinical Guidelines. Additionally, we searched evidence databases, including the JBI Database, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and two major Chinese-language databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang. Eligible evidence types included clinical guidelines, evidence-based texts, evidence summaries, best practice recommendations, and systematic reviews. The JBI quality appraisal tools, evidence preclassification system, and evidence recommendation grading framework were applied to assess the quality of the literature, extract and synthesize content, and classify the evidence.

Findings: A total of 38 pieces of best evidence were extracted from 26 studies. The evidence was categorized into five dimensions: basic characteristics of preoperative anxiety, screening and evaluation, nonpharmacological prevention, nonpharmacological intervention, and outcome evaluation. Among them, 26 pieces of evidence were graded as Level I, 1 as Level II, 2 as Level III, and 9 as Level V. Regarding recommendation strength, 24 pieces of evidence were rated as strong (Grade A) and 14 as weak (Grade B).

Conclusions: Various nonpharmacological strategies-such as screening, evaluation, patient education, cognitive behavioral therapy, and relaxation techniques-have demonstrated considerable effectiveness in reducing preoperative anxiety and improving patient outcomes. This study recommends that practitioners refer to this evidence summary, conduct a clinical audit of current practices in their institutions, and implement systematic quality improvements based on the best available evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信