布瓦西坦与左乙拉西坦治疗癫痫发作的有效性和安全性比较。

IF 1.2 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shalini Sivadasan, Flencinecia Basil Raj, Kevin John, Sowmya Murugan, Stephy Susan Sam, Senthil Kumar Elumalai
{"title":"布瓦西坦与左乙拉西坦治疗癫痫发作的有效性和安全性比较。","authors":"Shalini Sivadasan, Flencinecia Basil Raj, Kevin John, Sowmya Murugan, Stephy Susan Sam, Senthil Kumar Elumalai","doi":"10.1186/s42494-025-00229-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are increasing incidence of psychiatric side effects associated with the use of anti-epileptics. Prospective observational studies on the effectiveness and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) and brivaracetam (BRV), along with the haematological abnormalities of both treatments, in seizure patients in an Indian population are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of LEV and BRV in seizure patients and evaluated behavioural and non-behavioural side effects, as well as outcomes when switching between LEV and BRV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in newly diagnosed as well as previously diagnosed patients (n = 115) with epilepsy aged ≥ 5 years of age receiving LEV (n = 66) or BRV (n = 49). Baseline data were collected during the initiation of the study and were compared to the data obtained at the end of the study. A seizure severity questionnaire was used to assess the severity of seizures, and a brief psychiatric rating scale, Hamilton anxiety rating scale, and pediatric epilepsy side effects questionnaire were used to assess the behavioural and non-behavioural side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, adults taking LEV showed higher rates of behavioral adverse events (BAEs) compared to those on BRV. During follow-up, the most common behavioural adverse event reported in both treatment groups (LEV and BRV) was depression. The most frequently reported non-behavioural side effect in patients taking BRV was drowsiness. Patients who switched from LEV to BRV due to psychiatric side effects showed positive results with BRV (n = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, the study found that BRV is a safe alternative, with fewer and less severe side effects compared to LEV. While LEV showed slightly higher efficacy and a lower probability of drowsiness, BRV proved more tolerable for patients experiencing LEV-induced side effects. Switching from LEV to BRV decreased the psychiatric side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":33628,"journal":{"name":"Acta Epileptologica","volume":"7 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of brivaracetam in comparison with levetiracetam in seizures.\",\"authors\":\"Shalini Sivadasan, Flencinecia Basil Raj, Kevin John, Sowmya Murugan, Stephy Susan Sam, Senthil Kumar Elumalai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42494-025-00229-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are increasing incidence of psychiatric side effects associated with the use of anti-epileptics. Prospective observational studies on the effectiveness and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) and brivaracetam (BRV), along with the haematological abnormalities of both treatments, in seizure patients in an Indian population are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of LEV and BRV in seizure patients and evaluated behavioural and non-behavioural side effects, as well as outcomes when switching between LEV and BRV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in newly diagnosed as well as previously diagnosed patients (n = 115) with epilepsy aged ≥ 5 years of age receiving LEV (n = 66) or BRV (n = 49). Baseline data were collected during the initiation of the study and were compared to the data obtained at the end of the study. A seizure severity questionnaire was used to assess the severity of seizures, and a brief psychiatric rating scale, Hamilton anxiety rating scale, and pediatric epilepsy side effects questionnaire were used to assess the behavioural and non-behavioural side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, adults taking LEV showed higher rates of behavioral adverse events (BAEs) compared to those on BRV. During follow-up, the most common behavioural adverse event reported in both treatment groups (LEV and BRV) was depression. The most frequently reported non-behavioural side effect in patients taking BRV was drowsiness. Patients who switched from LEV to BRV due to psychiatric side effects showed positive results with BRV (n = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, the study found that BRV is a safe alternative, with fewer and less severe side effects compared to LEV. While LEV showed slightly higher efficacy and a lower probability of drowsiness, BRV proved more tolerable for patients experiencing LEV-induced side effects. Switching from LEV to BRV decreased the psychiatric side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Epileptologica\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490144/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Epileptologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42494-025-00229-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Epileptologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42494-025-00229-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与抗癫痫药物的使用相关的精神副反应的发生率越来越高。关于左乙拉西坦(LEV)和布瓦西坦(BRV)在印度人群癫痫患者中的有效性和安全性以及两种治疗方法的血流变异常的前瞻性观察性研究缺乏。因此,我们的目的是比较LEV和BRV在癫痫患者中的有效性和安全性,并评估LEV和BRV切换时的行为和非行为副作用以及结果。方法:对≥5岁癫痫患者(115例)进行前瞻性观察研究,分别接受LEV(66例)或BRV(49例)治疗。在研究开始时收集基线数据,并与研究结束时获得的数据进行比较。采用癫痫发作严重程度问卷评估癫痫发作严重程度,采用简短精神病学评定量表、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表和小儿癫痫副反应问卷评估行为和非行为副反应。结果:在基线时,服用LEV的成年人比服用BRV的成年人表现出更高的行为不良事件(BAEs)发生率。在随访期间,两个治疗组(LEV和BRV)报告的最常见的行为不良事件是抑郁。服用BRV的患者最常见的非行为副作用是嗜睡。由于精神副作用而从LEV转为BRV的患者显示BRV阳性结果(n = 5)。结论:综上所述,本研究发现BRV是一种安全的替代方案,与LEV相比,BRV的副作用更少、更轻。虽然LEV的疗效略高,嗜睡的可能性较低,但BRV被证明对经历LEV诱导的副作用的患者更耐受。从LEV到BRV的转换减少了精神方面的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and safety of brivaracetam in comparison with levetiracetam in seizures.

Background: There are increasing incidence of psychiatric side effects associated with the use of anti-epileptics. Prospective observational studies on the effectiveness and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) and brivaracetam (BRV), along with the haematological abnormalities of both treatments, in seizure patients in an Indian population are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of LEV and BRV in seizure patients and evaluated behavioural and non-behavioural side effects, as well as outcomes when switching between LEV and BRV.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in newly diagnosed as well as previously diagnosed patients (n = 115) with epilepsy aged ≥ 5 years of age receiving LEV (n = 66) or BRV (n = 49). Baseline data were collected during the initiation of the study and were compared to the data obtained at the end of the study. A seizure severity questionnaire was used to assess the severity of seizures, and a brief psychiatric rating scale, Hamilton anxiety rating scale, and pediatric epilepsy side effects questionnaire were used to assess the behavioural and non-behavioural side effects.

Results: At baseline, adults taking LEV showed higher rates of behavioral adverse events (BAEs) compared to those on BRV. During follow-up, the most common behavioural adverse event reported in both treatment groups (LEV and BRV) was depression. The most frequently reported non-behavioural side effect in patients taking BRV was drowsiness. Patients who switched from LEV to BRV due to psychiatric side effects showed positive results with BRV (n = 5).

Conclusions: In summary, the study found that BRV is a safe alternative, with fewer and less severe side effects compared to LEV. While LEV showed slightly higher efficacy and a lower probability of drowsiness, BRV proved more tolerable for patients experiencing LEV-induced side effects. Switching from LEV to BRV decreased the psychiatric side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Epileptologica
Acta Epileptologica Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信