体外重建人皮肤与THP-1共培养在化妆品皮肤增敏中的应用。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Bo Wang , Hongyu Ma , Yuying Cheng , Dangdang Cheng , Feifei Wang
{"title":"体外重建人皮肤与THP-1共培养在化妆品皮肤增敏中的应用。","authors":"Bo Wang ,&nbsp;Hongyu Ma ,&nbsp;Yuying Cheng ,&nbsp;Dangdang Cheng ,&nbsp;Feifei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.111738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sensitivity testing for cosmetic formulations mainly involves human patch tests. Cell models, including KeratinoSens<sup>TM</sup>, ARE-Nrf2 luciferase LuSens and h-CLAT, can predict chemical sensitization according to the OECD 442E standard.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to identify a potential approach for the assessment of the sensitization potential of cosmetics using skin models cocultured with THP-1 cells.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified the surface markers CD54 and CD86 in THP-1 cells using flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs); detected the relative secretion of IL-18, MTT and 7AAD; and evaluated tissue and cell viability. Adverse reactions were analysed using the human patch test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The relative level of IL-18 secretion after exposure to cinnamyl aldehyde, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene, propyl gallate and coumarin was less than 0.79. The relative fluorescence intensity of CD54 was greater than 150, and that for CD86 was greater than 200. Using RFI CD54 ≥ 150, RFI CD86 ≥ 200 or RS IL-18 ≤ 0.79 as the potential sensitization standard, an 18-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization. Moreover, a 23-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization in the human patch test. The sensitivity to the products in the in vitro test reached 56.52 %, compared with 75 % for the cleaning products.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>RFI CD54/CD86 and IL-18 may serve as a new approach to evaluate potential sensitization to cosmetics. In vitro SkinEthic and THP-1 cell coculture combined with the human patch test may better predict potential sensitization to cosmetics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23206,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology letters","volume":"413 ","pages":"Article 111738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of an in vitro reconstructed human skin coculture with THP-1 on cosmetics in skin sensitization\",\"authors\":\"Bo Wang ,&nbsp;Hongyu Ma ,&nbsp;Yuying Cheng ,&nbsp;Dangdang Cheng ,&nbsp;Feifei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.111738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sensitivity testing for cosmetic formulations mainly involves human patch tests. Cell models, including KeratinoSens<sup>TM</sup>, ARE-Nrf2 luciferase LuSens and h-CLAT, can predict chemical sensitization according to the OECD 442E standard.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to identify a potential approach for the assessment of the sensitization potential of cosmetics using skin models cocultured with THP-1 cells.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified the surface markers CD54 and CD86 in THP-1 cells using flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs); detected the relative secretion of IL-18, MTT and 7AAD; and evaluated tissue and cell viability. Adverse reactions were analysed using the human patch test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The relative level of IL-18 secretion after exposure to cinnamyl aldehyde, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene, propyl gallate and coumarin was less than 0.79. The relative fluorescence intensity of CD54 was greater than 150, and that for CD86 was greater than 200. Using RFI CD54 ≥ 150, RFI CD86 ≥ 200 or RS IL-18 ≤ 0.79 as the potential sensitization standard, an 18-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization. Moreover, a 23-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization in the human patch test. The sensitivity to the products in the in vitro test reached 56.52 %, compared with 75 % for the cleaning products.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>RFI CD54/CD86 and IL-18 may serve as a new approach to evaluate potential sensitization to cosmetics. In vitro SkinEthic and THP-1 cell coculture combined with the human patch test may better predict potential sensitization to cosmetics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology letters\",\"volume\":\"413 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427425026840\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427425026840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:化妆品配方的敏感性测试主要涉及人体斑贴试验。细胞模型,包括KeratinoSensTM, ARE-Nrf2荧光素酶LuSens和h-CLAT,可以根据OECD 442E标准预测化学致敏。目的:本研究的目的是利用皮肤模型与THP-1细胞共培养,确定一种评估化妆品致敏潜力的潜在方法。方法:采用流式细胞术和酶联免疫吸附法(elisa)鉴定THP-1细胞表面标志物CD54和CD86;检测IL-18、MTT、7AAD的相对分泌;并评估组织和细胞的活力。用人斑贴试验分析不良反应。结果:暴露于肉桂醛、2,4-二硝基氯苯、没食子酸丙酯和香豆素后IL-18的相对分泌水平均小于0.79。CD54的相对荧光强度大于150,CD86的相对荧光强度大于200。以RFI CD54≥150、RFI CD86≥200或RS IL-18≤0.79作为潜在致敏标准,18项化妆品配方引起致敏。此外,在人体贴片试验中,一种含有23种成分的化妆品配方引起了致敏。体外试验对该产品的敏感性为56.52%,对清洁产品的敏感性为75%。结论:RFI CD54/CD86和IL-18可作为评价化妆品潜在致敏性的新方法。体外皮肤细胞和THP-1细胞共培养结合人斑贴试验可以更好地预测潜在的化妆品致敏性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of an in vitro reconstructed human skin coculture with THP-1 on cosmetics in skin sensitization

Background

Sensitivity testing for cosmetic formulations mainly involves human patch tests. Cell models, including KeratinoSensTM, ARE-Nrf2 luciferase LuSens and h-CLAT, can predict chemical sensitization according to the OECD 442E standard.

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify a potential approach for the assessment of the sensitization potential of cosmetics using skin models cocultured with THP-1 cells.

Methods

We identified the surface markers CD54 and CD86 in THP-1 cells using flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs); detected the relative secretion of IL-18, MTT and 7AAD; and evaluated tissue and cell viability. Adverse reactions were analysed using the human patch test.

Results

The relative level of IL-18 secretion after exposure to cinnamyl aldehyde, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene, propyl gallate and coumarin was less than 0.79. The relative fluorescence intensity of CD54 was greater than 150, and that for CD86 was greater than 200. Using RFI CD54 ≥ 150, RFI CD86 ≥ 200 or RS IL-18 ≤ 0.79 as the potential sensitization standard, an 18-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization. Moreover, a 23-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization in the human patch test. The sensitivity to the products in the in vitro test reached 56.52 %, compared with 75 % for the cleaning products.

Conclusion

RFI CD54/CD86 and IL-18 may serve as a new approach to evaluate potential sensitization to cosmetics. In vitro SkinEthic and THP-1 cell coculture combined with the human patch test may better predict potential sensitization to cosmetics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicology letters
Toxicology letters 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
897
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: An international journal for the rapid publication of novel reports on a range of aspects of toxicology, especially mechanisms of toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信