Bo Wang , Hongyu Ma , Yuying Cheng , Dangdang Cheng , Feifei Wang
{"title":"体外重建人皮肤与THP-1共培养在化妆品皮肤增敏中的应用。","authors":"Bo Wang , Hongyu Ma , Yuying Cheng , Dangdang Cheng , Feifei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.111738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sensitivity testing for cosmetic formulations mainly involves human patch tests. Cell models, including KeratinoSens<sup>TM</sup>, ARE-Nrf2 luciferase LuSens and h-CLAT, can predict chemical sensitization according to the OECD 442E standard.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to identify a potential approach for the assessment of the sensitization potential of cosmetics using skin models cocultured with THP-1 cells.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified the surface markers CD54 and CD86 in THP-1 cells using flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs); detected the relative secretion of IL-18, MTT and 7AAD; and evaluated tissue and cell viability. Adverse reactions were analysed using the human patch test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The relative level of IL-18 secretion after exposure to cinnamyl aldehyde, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene, propyl gallate and coumarin was less than 0.79. The relative fluorescence intensity of CD54 was greater than 150, and that for CD86 was greater than 200. Using RFI CD54 ≥ 150, RFI CD86 ≥ 200 or RS IL-18 ≤ 0.79 as the potential sensitization standard, an 18-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization. Moreover, a 23-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization in the human patch test. The sensitivity to the products in the in vitro test reached 56.52 %, compared with 75 % for the cleaning products.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>RFI CD54/CD86 and IL-18 may serve as a new approach to evaluate potential sensitization to cosmetics. In vitro SkinEthic and THP-1 cell coculture combined with the human patch test may better predict potential sensitization to cosmetics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23206,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology letters","volume":"413 ","pages":"Article 111738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of an in vitro reconstructed human skin coculture with THP-1 on cosmetics in skin sensitization\",\"authors\":\"Bo Wang , Hongyu Ma , Yuying Cheng , Dangdang Cheng , Feifei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.111738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sensitivity testing for cosmetic formulations mainly involves human patch tests. Cell models, including KeratinoSens<sup>TM</sup>, ARE-Nrf2 luciferase LuSens and h-CLAT, can predict chemical sensitization according to the OECD 442E standard.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to identify a potential approach for the assessment of the sensitization potential of cosmetics using skin models cocultured with THP-1 cells.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified the surface markers CD54 and CD86 in THP-1 cells using flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs); detected the relative secretion of IL-18, MTT and 7AAD; and evaluated tissue and cell viability. Adverse reactions were analysed using the human patch test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The relative level of IL-18 secretion after exposure to cinnamyl aldehyde, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene, propyl gallate and coumarin was less than 0.79. The relative fluorescence intensity of CD54 was greater than 150, and that for CD86 was greater than 200. Using RFI CD54 ≥ 150, RFI CD86 ≥ 200 or RS IL-18 ≤ 0.79 as the potential sensitization standard, an 18-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization. Moreover, a 23-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization in the human patch test. The sensitivity to the products in the in vitro test reached 56.52 %, compared with 75 % for the cleaning products.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>RFI CD54/CD86 and IL-18 may serve as a new approach to evaluate potential sensitization to cosmetics. In vitro SkinEthic and THP-1 cell coculture combined with the human patch test may better predict potential sensitization to cosmetics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology letters\",\"volume\":\"413 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427425026840\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427425026840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of an in vitro reconstructed human skin coculture with THP-1 on cosmetics in skin sensitization
Background
Sensitivity testing for cosmetic formulations mainly involves human patch tests. Cell models, including KeratinoSensTM, ARE-Nrf2 luciferase LuSens and h-CLAT, can predict chemical sensitization according to the OECD 442E standard.
Objective
The aim of this study was to identify a potential approach for the assessment of the sensitization potential of cosmetics using skin models cocultured with THP-1 cells.
Methods
We identified the surface markers CD54 and CD86 in THP-1 cells using flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs); detected the relative secretion of IL-18, MTT and 7AAD; and evaluated tissue and cell viability. Adverse reactions were analysed using the human patch test.
Results
The relative level of IL-18 secretion after exposure to cinnamyl aldehyde, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene, propyl gallate and coumarin was less than 0.79. The relative fluorescence intensity of CD54 was greater than 150, and that for CD86 was greater than 200. Using RFI CD54 ≥ 150, RFI CD86 ≥ 200 or RS IL-18 ≤ 0.79 as the potential sensitization standard, an 18-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization. Moreover, a 23-item cosmetic formulation caused sensitization in the human patch test. The sensitivity to the products in the in vitro test reached 56.52 %, compared with 75 % for the cleaning products.
Conclusion
RFI CD54/CD86 and IL-18 may serve as a new approach to evaluate potential sensitization to cosmetics. In vitro SkinEthic and THP-1 cell coculture combined with the human patch test may better predict potential sensitization to cosmetics.