Bragg-peak FLASH生物优化使眼立体定向体放射治疗的正常组织保留和剂量增加得到增强。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Muhammad Hamza, Balaji Selvaraj, Xingyi Zhao, Chingyun Cheng, Tyler Kaulfers, Grant Lattery, Huifang Zhai, Charles Simone, Christopher Barker, Jenghwa Chang, Haibo Lin, Minglei Kang
{"title":"Bragg-peak FLASH生物优化使眼立体定向体放射治疗的正常组织保留和剂量增加得到增强。","authors":"Muhammad Hamza, Balaji Selvaraj, Xingyi Zhao, Chingyun Cheng, Tyler Kaulfers, Grant Lattery, Huifang Zhai, Charles Simone, Christopher Barker, Jenghwa Chang, Haibo Lin, Minglei Kang","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ae0ef7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate proton Bragg peak FLASH for ocular treatments to enhance normal tissue sparing and enable dose escalation via FLASH biological optimization(FBO).&#xD;Approach: The FLASH-sparing factors for normal tissues were derived from the literature in modeling the phenomenological FLASH normal tissue sparing effect. Using the single-energy BP-FLASH technique(SEBP-FLASH), an in-house treatment planning system was implemented with the FLASH FBO module. Ten consecutive ocular patients who were treated using conventional dose rate intensity-modulated proton therapy(CONV-IMPT) to 50Gy in 5 fractions were replanned using the FLASH technique. The dose metrics for the OARs were compared using the two different techniques. The fraction dose was then intentionally escalated from 10 to 12Gy through FBO to assess whether the plans still met clinical constraints. &#xD;Main results: In the FLASH regimen without FBO(50Gy/5 fractions), all ipsilateral OAR dosimetric metrics met clinical objectives with safe margins. While the clinical CONV-IMPT approach demonstrated slightly better dosimetric performance than SEBP-FLASH plans, the incorporation of FBO improved all OAR dose metrics beyond those of CONV- IMPT, except for the mean dose to the cornea (no difference). When the target dose was increased from 50 to 60Gy using FBO, all OARs remained within clinical limits. The mean and maximum doses to the cornea increased from 11.7 to 15.4Gy and from 22.8 to 23.6Gy, respectively, when transitioning from 50Gy CONV- IMPT to 60Gy FBO. However, in the 60Gy FBO plans, the maximum doses were reduced for the eye (102.0% to 87.0%), optic nerves (98.7% to 74.0%), retina (100.5% to 81.8%), lacrimal gland (84.9% to 73.2%), and conjunctiva (91% to 72.3%).&#xD;Significance: SEBP-FLASH achieves plan quality comparable to CONV-IMPT using 50 Gy/5 fractions and enables dose escalation via FLASH FBO while meeting clinical standards, potentially improving tumor control with acceptable toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bragg-peak FLASH Biological Optimization Enables Enhanced Normal Tissue Sparing and Dose Escalation for Ocular Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Hamza, Balaji Selvaraj, Xingyi Zhao, Chingyun Cheng, Tyler Kaulfers, Grant Lattery, Huifang Zhai, Charles Simone, Christopher Barker, Jenghwa Chang, Haibo Lin, Minglei Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/ae0ef7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate proton Bragg peak FLASH for ocular treatments to enhance normal tissue sparing and enable dose escalation via FLASH biological optimization(FBO).&#xD;Approach: The FLASH-sparing factors for normal tissues were derived from the literature in modeling the phenomenological FLASH normal tissue sparing effect. Using the single-energy BP-FLASH technique(SEBP-FLASH), an in-house treatment planning system was implemented with the FLASH FBO module. Ten consecutive ocular patients who were treated using conventional dose rate intensity-modulated proton therapy(CONV-IMPT) to 50Gy in 5 fractions were replanned using the FLASH technique. The dose metrics for the OARs were compared using the two different techniques. The fraction dose was then intentionally escalated from 10 to 12Gy through FBO to assess whether the plans still met clinical constraints. &#xD;Main results: In the FLASH regimen without FBO(50Gy/5 fractions), all ipsilateral OAR dosimetric metrics met clinical objectives with safe margins. While the clinical CONV-IMPT approach demonstrated slightly better dosimetric performance than SEBP-FLASH plans, the incorporation of FBO improved all OAR dose metrics beyond those of CONV- IMPT, except for the mean dose to the cornea (no difference). When the target dose was increased from 50 to 60Gy using FBO, all OARs remained within clinical limits. The mean and maximum doses to the cornea increased from 11.7 to 15.4Gy and from 22.8 to 23.6Gy, respectively, when transitioning from 50Gy CONV- IMPT to 60Gy FBO. However, in the 60Gy FBO plans, the maximum doses were reduced for the eye (102.0% to 87.0%), optic nerves (98.7% to 74.0%), retina (100.5% to 81.8%), lacrimal gland (84.9% to 73.2%), and conjunctiva (91% to 72.3%).&#xD;Significance: SEBP-FLASH achieves plan quality comparable to CONV-IMPT using 50 Gy/5 fractions and enables dose escalation via FLASH FBO while meeting clinical standards, potentially improving tumor control with acceptable toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae0ef7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae0ef7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过FLASH生物优化(FBO)方法,评价质子Bragg峰FLASH在眼部治疗中增强正常组织保留和剂量递增的作用。方法:根据文献对正常组织的FLASH保留效应进行建模,得出正常组织的FLASH保留因子。采用单能量BP-FLASH技术(SEBP-FLASH),利用FLASH FBO模块实现了内部处理计划系统。连续10例使用常规剂量率调强质子治疗(convt - impt)治疗的眼部患者,分5次接受50Gy剂量调强质子治疗。使用两种不同的技术比较了桨的剂量指标。然后通过FBO有意地将部分剂量从10 gy增加到12Gy,以评估该计划是否仍符合临床限制。主要结果:在无FBO的FLASH方案中(50Gy/5分数),所有同侧OAR剂量学指标均符合临床目标,具有安全边际。虽然临床的convt -IMPT方法比SEBP-FLASH计划显示出稍好的剂量学性能,但除了角膜的平均剂量(无差异)外,FBO的结合比CONV-IMPT方法改善了所有的OAR剂量指标。当使用FBO将靶剂量从50 gy增加到60Gy时,所有OARs均保持在临床限制范围内。从50Gy CONV- IMPT过渡到60Gy FBO时,角膜的平均剂量和最大剂量分别从11.7 gy增加到15.4Gy和22.8 gy增加到23.6Gy。然而,在60Gy FBO计划中,眼睛(102.0%至87.0%)、视神经(98.7%至74.0%)、视网膜(100.5%至81.8%)、泪腺(84.9%至73.2%)和结膜(91%至72.3%)的最大剂量降低。意义:SEBP-FLASH达到了与使用50 Gy/5分数的convt - impt相当的计划质量,并且可以通过FLASH FBO增加剂量,同时满足临床标准,潜在地改善肿瘤控制和可接受的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bragg-peak FLASH Biological Optimization Enables Enhanced Normal Tissue Sparing and Dose Escalation for Ocular Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Objective: To evaluate proton Bragg peak FLASH for ocular treatments to enhance normal tissue sparing and enable dose escalation via FLASH biological optimization(FBO). Approach: The FLASH-sparing factors for normal tissues were derived from the literature in modeling the phenomenological FLASH normal tissue sparing effect. Using the single-energy BP-FLASH technique(SEBP-FLASH), an in-house treatment planning system was implemented with the FLASH FBO module. Ten consecutive ocular patients who were treated using conventional dose rate intensity-modulated proton therapy(CONV-IMPT) to 50Gy in 5 fractions were replanned using the FLASH technique. The dose metrics for the OARs were compared using the two different techniques. The fraction dose was then intentionally escalated from 10 to 12Gy through FBO to assess whether the plans still met clinical constraints. Main results: In the FLASH regimen without FBO(50Gy/5 fractions), all ipsilateral OAR dosimetric metrics met clinical objectives with safe margins. While the clinical CONV-IMPT approach demonstrated slightly better dosimetric performance than SEBP-FLASH plans, the incorporation of FBO improved all OAR dose metrics beyond those of CONV- IMPT, except for the mean dose to the cornea (no difference). When the target dose was increased from 50 to 60Gy using FBO, all OARs remained within clinical limits. The mean and maximum doses to the cornea increased from 11.7 to 15.4Gy and from 22.8 to 23.6Gy, respectively, when transitioning from 50Gy CONV- IMPT to 60Gy FBO. However, in the 60Gy FBO plans, the maximum doses were reduced for the eye (102.0% to 87.0%), optic nerves (98.7% to 74.0%), retina (100.5% to 81.8%), lacrimal gland (84.9% to 73.2%), and conjunctiva (91% to 72.3%). Significance: SEBP-FLASH achieves plan quality comparable to CONV-IMPT using 50 Gy/5 fractions and enables dose escalation via FLASH FBO while meeting clinical standards, potentially improving tumor control with acceptable toxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信