丁丙诺啡替代作为慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物停药的逐渐减少策略:一项非随机和概念证明研究。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Célian Bertin, Nicolas Kerckhove, Florent Ferrer, Bruno Pereira, Christian Duale, Damien Richard, Nicolas Authier, Noémie Delage
{"title":"丁丙诺啡替代作为慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物停药的逐渐减少策略:一项非随机和概念证明研究。","authors":"Célian Bertin, Nicolas Kerckhove, Florent Ferrer, Bruno Pereira, Christian Duale, Damien Richard, Nicolas Authier, Noémie Delage","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00781-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-term use (≥ 3 months) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) shows limited benefit and often leads to dependence, especially when tapered too quickly. Standard opioid discontinuation typically involves gradual dose reduction, yet many patients fail to complete it. Meta-analyses show buprenorphine reduces withdrawal severity, increases treatment retention and completion rates, and facilitates analgesia and smoother transitions in patients with chronic pain, with low adverse effects and high initiation success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, nonrandomized proof-of-concept study assessed the efficacy of an outpatient buprenorphine-based discontinuation strategy in patients with CNCP and opioid dependence who had failed standard tapering. Participants first attempted gradual tapering; those unsuccessful transitioned to buprenorphine: 4-8 mg/day for 1 month, followed by tapering over up to 9 months. Success was defined as complete opioid cessation at 9 months, confirmed by urine analysis (including buprenorphine). The primary outcome was the success rate of the buprenorphine strategy, with ≥ 60% considered effective. A secondary outcome compared success rates between strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 20 patients, six (30.0%) successfully withdrew using standard tapering. Fourteen failed; 11 of them transitioned to buprenorphine. Of these, seven (63.6%) achieved full discontinuation. While not statistically significant, the buprenorphine group showed a higher success rate than standard tapering (p = 0.076; OR = 4.08 [0.90-21.23]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Buprenorphine substitution appears at least as effective as conventional tapering and may benefit patients unable to succeed with tapering alone. These preliminary results support further investigation in larger trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials. gov identifier, NCT03156907.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buprenorphine Substitution as a Tapering Strategy for Opioid Discontinuation in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Nonrandomized and Proof of Concept Study.\",\"authors\":\"Célian Bertin, Nicolas Kerckhove, Florent Ferrer, Bruno Pereira, Christian Duale, Damien Richard, Nicolas Authier, Noémie Delage\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40122-025-00781-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-term use (≥ 3 months) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) shows limited benefit and often leads to dependence, especially when tapered too quickly. Standard opioid discontinuation typically involves gradual dose reduction, yet many patients fail to complete it. Meta-analyses show buprenorphine reduces withdrawal severity, increases treatment retention and completion rates, and facilitates analgesia and smoother transitions in patients with chronic pain, with low adverse effects and high initiation success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, nonrandomized proof-of-concept study assessed the efficacy of an outpatient buprenorphine-based discontinuation strategy in patients with CNCP and opioid dependence who had failed standard tapering. Participants first attempted gradual tapering; those unsuccessful transitioned to buprenorphine: 4-8 mg/day for 1 month, followed by tapering over up to 9 months. Success was defined as complete opioid cessation at 9 months, confirmed by urine analysis (including buprenorphine). The primary outcome was the success rate of the buprenorphine strategy, with ≥ 60% considered effective. A secondary outcome compared success rates between strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 20 patients, six (30.0%) successfully withdrew using standard tapering. Fourteen failed; 11 of them transitioned to buprenorphine. Of these, seven (63.6%) achieved full discontinuation. While not statistically significant, the buprenorphine group showed a higher success rate than standard tapering (p = 0.076; OR = 4.08 [0.90-21.23]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Buprenorphine substitution appears at least as effective as conventional tapering and may benefit patients unable to succeed with tapering alone. These preliminary results support further investigation in larger trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials. gov identifier, NCT03156907.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00781-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00781-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期使用(≥3个月)阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)显示出有限的益处,并经常导致依赖,特别是当减量过快时。标准的阿片类药物停药通常涉及逐渐减少剂量,但许多患者未能完成。荟萃分析显示,丁丙诺啡降低了戒断严重程度,增加了治疗保留率和完成率,促进了慢性疼痛患者的镇痛和平稳过渡,不良反应低,开始成功率高。方法:这项单中心、前瞻性、非随机的概念验证研究评估了门诊丁丙诺啡停药策略对标准减量失败的CNCP和阿片类药物依赖患者的疗效。参与者首先尝试逐步削减;不成功者改用丁丙诺啡:4-8毫克/天,持续1个月,随后逐渐减少至9个月。成功定义为在9个月时完全停止阿片类药物,并通过尿液分析(包括丁丙诺啡)证实。主要终点是丁丙诺啡策略的成功率,有效率≥60%。次要结果比较不同策略的成功率。结果:20例患者中,6例(30.0%)成功退出标准锥形治疗。十四失败;其中11人改用丁丙诺啡。其中,7例(63.6%)实现了完全停药。丁丙诺啡组的成功率高于标准锥形组(p = 0.076; OR = 4.08[0.90-21.23]),但无统计学意义。结论:丁丙诺啡替代至少与常规减量治疗一样有效,并且可能使单纯减量治疗无法成功的患者受益。这些初步结果支持在更大的试验中进一步调查。试验注册:临床试验。gov标识符,NCT03156907。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Buprenorphine Substitution as a Tapering Strategy for Opioid Discontinuation in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Nonrandomized and Proof of Concept Study.

Introduction: Long-term use (≥ 3 months) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) shows limited benefit and often leads to dependence, especially when tapered too quickly. Standard opioid discontinuation typically involves gradual dose reduction, yet many patients fail to complete it. Meta-analyses show buprenorphine reduces withdrawal severity, increases treatment retention and completion rates, and facilitates analgesia and smoother transitions in patients with chronic pain, with low adverse effects and high initiation success.

Methods: This single-center, prospective, nonrandomized proof-of-concept study assessed the efficacy of an outpatient buprenorphine-based discontinuation strategy in patients with CNCP and opioid dependence who had failed standard tapering. Participants first attempted gradual tapering; those unsuccessful transitioned to buprenorphine: 4-8 mg/day for 1 month, followed by tapering over up to 9 months. Success was defined as complete opioid cessation at 9 months, confirmed by urine analysis (including buprenorphine). The primary outcome was the success rate of the buprenorphine strategy, with ≥ 60% considered effective. A secondary outcome compared success rates between strategies.

Results: Of 20 patients, six (30.0%) successfully withdrew using standard tapering. Fourteen failed; 11 of them transitioned to buprenorphine. Of these, seven (63.6%) achieved full discontinuation. While not statistically significant, the buprenorphine group showed a higher success rate than standard tapering (p = 0.076; OR = 4.08 [0.90-21.23]).

Conclusions: Buprenorphine substitution appears at least as effective as conventional tapering and may benefit patients unable to succeed with tapering alone. These preliminary results support further investigation in larger trials.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials. gov identifier, NCT03156907.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信