优化MPRAGE在颈动脉成像中增强血液抑制和斑块内出血检测。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Seong-Eun Kim, John A Roberts, J Rock Hadley, J Scott McNally, Gerald S Treiman, Yibin Xie, Debiao Li, Kim-Lien Nguyen, Dimitrios Mitsouras, Jonas Schollenberger, David Salone, Arunbalaji Pugazhendhi, Kevin J Johnson, Maria Altbach, Douglas Morris, Kevin DeMarco, Vibhas Deshpande, Pedro Itriago-Leon, Dennis L Parker
{"title":"优化MPRAGE在颈动脉成像中增强血液抑制和斑块内出血检测。","authors":"Seong-Eun Kim, John A Roberts, J Rock Hadley, J Scott McNally, Gerald S Treiman, Yibin Xie, Debiao Li, Kim-Lien Nguyen, Dimitrios Mitsouras, Jonas Schollenberger, David Salone, Arunbalaji Pugazhendhi, Kevin J Johnson, Maria Altbach, Douglas Morris, Kevin DeMarco, Vibhas Deshpande, Pedro Itriago-Leon, Dennis L Parker","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to optimize the Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) technique to improve the accuracy of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) detection in carotid diseases and enhance reliability for clinical use, addressing the challenge of inconsistent blood suppression observed in commonly used clinical protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bloch equation simulations were used to evaluate the effects of inversion time and flip angle on blood suppression and tissue contrast. The optimized parameters were implemented on a clinical 3 T scanner and tested in four subjects. Quantitative measures included blood-muscle contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for lumen-wall and lumen-IPH. Imaging was performed in 21 patients with carotid artery disease, two MPRAGE acquisitions were performed per patient: (1) at the magnet isocenter with the standard IR pulse, and (2) at a 50-mm shifted position toward the heart with the wideband IR pulse. Qualitative image quality was evaluated independently by two neuroradiologists using a predefined 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent) for blood suppression, vessel wall clarity, motion artifacts, and IPH visualization, in addition to quantitative SNR and CNR measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimized MPRAGE sequence demonstrated significantly improved blood suppression, with blood-muscle contrast increasing from 0.42 ± 0.08 to 0.61 ± 0.07 (p = 0.002). Lumen-wall CNR increased from 15.2 ± 3.4 to 22.8 ± 4.1 (p = 0.01), and lumen-IPH CNR increased from 18.7 ± 5.2 to 26.3 ± 6.0 (p = 0.004). These improvements enhanced vessel wall delineation and IPH conspicuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimization of MPRAGE parameters enhances blood suppression and contrast, providing improved visualization of the carotid vessel wall and more reliable detection of IPH. This approach may increase the diagnostic accuracy of carotid plaque imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":" ","pages":"110531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing MPRAGE for enhanced blood suppression and intraplaque hemorrhage detection in carotid artery imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Seong-Eun Kim, John A Roberts, J Rock Hadley, J Scott McNally, Gerald S Treiman, Yibin Xie, Debiao Li, Kim-Lien Nguyen, Dimitrios Mitsouras, Jonas Schollenberger, David Salone, Arunbalaji Pugazhendhi, Kevin J Johnson, Maria Altbach, Douglas Morris, Kevin DeMarco, Vibhas Deshpande, Pedro Itriago-Leon, Dennis L Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to optimize the Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) technique to improve the accuracy of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) detection in carotid diseases and enhance reliability for clinical use, addressing the challenge of inconsistent blood suppression observed in commonly used clinical protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bloch equation simulations were used to evaluate the effects of inversion time and flip angle on blood suppression and tissue contrast. The optimized parameters were implemented on a clinical 3 T scanner and tested in four subjects. Quantitative measures included blood-muscle contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for lumen-wall and lumen-IPH. Imaging was performed in 21 patients with carotid artery disease, two MPRAGE acquisitions were performed per patient: (1) at the magnet isocenter with the standard IR pulse, and (2) at a 50-mm shifted position toward the heart with the wideband IR pulse. Qualitative image quality was evaluated independently by two neuroradiologists using a predefined 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent) for blood suppression, vessel wall clarity, motion artifacts, and IPH visualization, in addition to quantitative SNR and CNR measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimized MPRAGE sequence demonstrated significantly improved blood suppression, with blood-muscle contrast increasing from 0.42 ± 0.08 to 0.61 ± 0.07 (p = 0.002). Lumen-wall CNR increased from 15.2 ± 3.4 to 22.8 ± 4.1 (p = 0.01), and lumen-IPH CNR increased from 18.7 ± 5.2 to 26.3 ± 6.0 (p = 0.004). These improvements enhanced vessel wall delineation and IPH conspicuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimization of MPRAGE parameters enhances blood suppression and contrast, providing improved visualization of the carotid vessel wall and more reliable detection of IPH. This approach may increase the diagnostic accuracy of carotid plaque imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2025.110531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2025.110531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在优化磁化制备快速采集梯度回波(MPRAGE)技术,以提高颈动脉疾病斑块内出血(IPH)检测的准确性,提高临床使用的可靠性,解决常用临床方案中观察到的血液抑制不一致的挑战。方法:采用Bloch方程模拟评价倒置时间和翻转角度对血液抑制和组织造影的影响。优化后的参数在临床3 T扫描仪上实现,并在4名受试者中进行了测试。定量测量包括血肌对比和管壁和管腔iph的噪声对比比(CNR)。对21例颈动脉疾病患者进行影像学检查,每例患者进行两次MPRAGE采集:(1)在磁体等心处进行标准IR脉冲采集,(2)在向心脏方向偏移50 mm处进行宽带IR脉冲采集。定性图像质量由两名神经放射学家使用预定义的4分制(1 = 差,4 = 优)独立评估,包括血压抑制、血管壁清晰度、运动伪影和IPH可视化,以及定量信噪比和CNR测量。结果:优化后的MPRAGE序列明显改善了血液抑制效果,血肌对比从0.42 ± 0.08增加到0.61 ± 0.07 (p = 0.002)。Lumen-wall CNR增加从15.2 ± 3.4到22.8 ± 4.1 (p = 0.01),和lumen-IPH CNR增加从18.7 ± 5.2到26.3 ±6.0 (p = 0.004)。这些改善增强了血管壁的描绘和IPH的显著性。结论:优化MPRAGE参数可增强血液抑制和造影,改善颈动脉血管壁的可视化,更可靠地检测IPH。该方法可提高颈动脉斑块成像的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing MPRAGE for enhanced blood suppression and intraplaque hemorrhage detection in carotid artery imaging.

Purpose: This study aims to optimize the Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) technique to improve the accuracy of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) detection in carotid diseases and enhance reliability for clinical use, addressing the challenge of inconsistent blood suppression observed in commonly used clinical protocols.

Methods: Bloch equation simulations were used to evaluate the effects of inversion time and flip angle on blood suppression and tissue contrast. The optimized parameters were implemented on a clinical 3 T scanner and tested in four subjects. Quantitative measures included blood-muscle contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for lumen-wall and lumen-IPH. Imaging was performed in 21 patients with carotid artery disease, two MPRAGE acquisitions were performed per patient: (1) at the magnet isocenter with the standard IR pulse, and (2) at a 50-mm shifted position toward the heart with the wideband IR pulse. Qualitative image quality was evaluated independently by two neuroradiologists using a predefined 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent) for blood suppression, vessel wall clarity, motion artifacts, and IPH visualization, in addition to quantitative SNR and CNR measurements.

Results: The optimized MPRAGE sequence demonstrated significantly improved blood suppression, with blood-muscle contrast increasing from 0.42 ± 0.08 to 0.61 ± 0.07 (p = 0.002). Lumen-wall CNR increased from 15.2 ± 3.4 to 22.8 ± 4.1 (p = 0.01), and lumen-IPH CNR increased from 18.7 ± 5.2 to 26.3 ± 6.0 (p = 0.004). These improvements enhanced vessel wall delineation and IPH conspicuity.

Conclusion: Optimization of MPRAGE parameters enhances blood suppression and contrast, providing improved visualization of the carotid vessel wall and more reliable detection of IPH. This approach may increase the diagnostic accuracy of carotid plaque imaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信