多组学数据驱动的基因组预测。

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Frontiers in Genetics Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgene.2025.1636438
Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Brandon Alejandro Mosqueda-González, Iván Delgado-Enciso, Moises Chavira-Flores, José Crossa, Susanne Dreisigacker, Jin Sun, Rodomiro Ortiz
{"title":"多组学数据驱动的基因组预测。","authors":"Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Brandon Alejandro Mosqueda-González, Iván Delgado-Enciso, Moises Chavira-Flores, José Crossa, Susanne Dreisigacker, Jin Sun, Rodomiro Ortiz","doi":"10.3389/fgene.2025.1636438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomic selection (GS) has transformed plant breeding by enabling early and accurate prediction of complex traits. However, its predictive performance is often constrained by the limited information captured through genomic markers alone, especially for traits influenced by intricate biological pathways. To address this, the integration of complementary omics layers-such as transcriptomics and metabolomics-has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance prediction accuracy by providing a more comprehensive view of the molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic variation. We used three datasets, each collected under a single-environment condition, which allowed us to isolate the effects of omics integration without the confounding influence of genotype-by-environment interaction. We assessed 24 integration strategies combining three omics layers: genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics. These strategies encompassed both early data fusion (concatenation) and model-based integration techniques capable of capturing non-additive, nonlinear, and hierarchical interactions across omics layers. The evaluation was conducted using three real-world datasets from maize and rice, which varied in population size, trait complexity, and omics dimensionality. Our results indicate that specific integration methods-particularly those leveraging model-based fusion-consistently improve predictive accuracy over genomic-only models, especially for complex traits. Conversely, several commonly used concatenation approaches did not yield consistent benefits and, in some cases, underperformed. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate integration strategies and suggest that more sophisticated modeling frameworks are necessary to fully exploit the potential of multi-omics data. Overall, this work highlights both the value and limitations of multi-omics integration for genomic prediction and offers practical insights into the design of omics-informed selection strategies for accelerating genetic gain in plant breeding programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12750,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Genetics","volume":"16 ","pages":"1636438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic prediction powered by multi-omics data.\",\"authors\":\"Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Brandon Alejandro Mosqueda-González, Iván Delgado-Enciso, Moises Chavira-Flores, José Crossa, Susanne Dreisigacker, Jin Sun, Rodomiro Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgene.2025.1636438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genomic selection (GS) has transformed plant breeding by enabling early and accurate prediction of complex traits. However, its predictive performance is often constrained by the limited information captured through genomic markers alone, especially for traits influenced by intricate biological pathways. To address this, the integration of complementary omics layers-such as transcriptomics and metabolomics-has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance prediction accuracy by providing a more comprehensive view of the molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic variation. We used three datasets, each collected under a single-environment condition, which allowed us to isolate the effects of omics integration without the confounding influence of genotype-by-environment interaction. We assessed 24 integration strategies combining three omics layers: genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics. These strategies encompassed both early data fusion (concatenation) and model-based integration techniques capable of capturing non-additive, nonlinear, and hierarchical interactions across omics layers. The evaluation was conducted using three real-world datasets from maize and rice, which varied in population size, trait complexity, and omics dimensionality. Our results indicate that specific integration methods-particularly those leveraging model-based fusion-consistently improve predictive accuracy over genomic-only models, especially for complex traits. Conversely, several commonly used concatenation approaches did not yield consistent benefits and, in some cases, underperformed. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate integration strategies and suggest that more sophisticated modeling frameworks are necessary to fully exploit the potential of multi-omics data. Overall, this work highlights both the value and limitations of multi-omics integration for genomic prediction and offers practical insights into the design of omics-informed selection strategies for accelerating genetic gain in plant breeding programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Genetics\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1636438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1636438\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1636438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因组选择(GS)通过能够对复杂性状进行早期和准确的预测,已经改变了植物育种。然而,其预测性能往往受到仅通过基因组标记捕获的有限信息的限制,特别是对于受复杂生物学途径影响的性状。为了解决这个问题,整合互补组学层(如转录组学和代谢组学)已经成为一种有希望的策略,通过提供更全面的表型变异的分子机制来提高预测准确性。我们使用了三个数据集,每个数据集都是在单一环境条件下收集的,这使我们能够分离组学整合的影响,而不受基因型-环境相互作用的混杂影响。我们评估了24种整合策略,结合三个组学层:基因组学、转录组学和代谢组学。这些策略包括早期的数据融合(连接)和基于模型的集成技术,这些技术能够捕获跨组学层的非加性、非线性和分层交互。该评估使用了来自玉米和水稻的三个真实数据集进行,这些数据集在群体规模、性状复杂性和组学维度上各不相同。我们的研究结果表明,特定的整合方法——特别是那些利用基于模型的融合的方法——始终比仅基因组模型提高预测准确性,特别是对于复杂性状。相反,几种常用的串联方法并没有产生一致的好处,在某些情况下,表现不佳。这些发现强调了选择合适的整合策略的重要性,并表明需要更复杂的建模框架来充分利用多组学数据的潜力。总的来说,这项工作强调了多组学整合基因组预测的价值和局限性,并为加速植物育种计划中遗传增益的组学信息选择策略的设计提供了实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Genomic prediction powered by multi-omics data.

Genomic prediction powered by multi-omics data.

Genomic prediction powered by multi-omics data.

Genomic prediction powered by multi-omics data.

Genomic selection (GS) has transformed plant breeding by enabling early and accurate prediction of complex traits. However, its predictive performance is often constrained by the limited information captured through genomic markers alone, especially for traits influenced by intricate biological pathways. To address this, the integration of complementary omics layers-such as transcriptomics and metabolomics-has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance prediction accuracy by providing a more comprehensive view of the molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic variation. We used three datasets, each collected under a single-environment condition, which allowed us to isolate the effects of omics integration without the confounding influence of genotype-by-environment interaction. We assessed 24 integration strategies combining three omics layers: genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics. These strategies encompassed both early data fusion (concatenation) and model-based integration techniques capable of capturing non-additive, nonlinear, and hierarchical interactions across omics layers. The evaluation was conducted using three real-world datasets from maize and rice, which varied in population size, trait complexity, and omics dimensionality. Our results indicate that specific integration methods-particularly those leveraging model-based fusion-consistently improve predictive accuracy over genomic-only models, especially for complex traits. Conversely, several commonly used concatenation approaches did not yield consistent benefits and, in some cases, underperformed. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate integration strategies and suggest that more sophisticated modeling frameworks are necessary to fully exploit the potential of multi-omics data. Overall, this work highlights both the value and limitations of multi-omics integration for genomic prediction and offers practical insights into the design of omics-informed selection strategies for accelerating genetic gain in plant breeding programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Genetics
Frontiers in Genetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
3491
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Genetics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on genes and genomes relating to all the domains of life, from humans to plants to livestock and other model organisms. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of the world’s leading experts, this multidisciplinary, open-access journal is at the forefront of communicating cutting-edge research to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public. The study of inheritance and the impact of the genome on various biological processes is well documented. However, the majority of discoveries are still to come. A new era is seeing major developments in the function and variability of the genome, the use of genetic and genomic tools and the analysis of the genetic basis of various biological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信