艾氯胺酮与芬太尼作为辅助治疗肝门神经阻滞的门诊经皮肝肿瘤消融关注呼吸安全:一项随机对照试验方案。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1644029
Xiao Wang, Lijuan Yan, Jiaying Cai, Jianfei Wei, Zuobing Zhang, Bin Yang
{"title":"艾氯胺酮与芬太尼作为辅助治疗肝门神经阻滞的门诊经皮肝肿瘤消融关注呼吸安全:一项随机对照试验方案。","authors":"Xiao Wang, Lijuan Yan, Jiaying Cai, Jianfei Wei, Zuobing Zhang, Bin Yang","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1644029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) is a critical safety concern during ambulatory percutaneous liver tumor thermal ablation. Esketamine has been shown to offer a promising opioid-sparing alternative with the potential to provide respiratory stability benefits. We hypothesize that hepatic hilar nerve block (HHNB) combined with esketamine will reduce the incidence of respiratory depression when compared to HHNB in conjunction with fentanyl in this particular context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) will enroll patients undergoing ambulatory ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver thermal ablation. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either intravenous esketamine 0.37 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> (Intervention group) or intravenous fentanyl 1 μg·kg<sup>-</sup> (Control group). All subjects will receive a standardized premedication consisting of midazolam 0.03 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IV, followed by ultrasound-guided HHNB.</p><p><strong>Results and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome is the incidence of respiratory depression, defined as SpO<sub>2</sub> <90% or EtCO<sub>2</sub> >55 mmHg. Secondary outcomes include the rate of anesthesia success, postoperative pain scores, and the consumption of remedial analgesia at 2, 6, and 24 h post-surgery. Additionally, satisfaction scores from both the sonographer and the patient are considered, along with any adverse events that may occur. The statistical analysis will utilize appropriate parametric/non-parametric tests for continuous data and chi-square/Fisher's exact tests for categorical data (significance p < 0.05), using SPSS (v20.0) and R (v4.4.3; R Foundation) within the RStudio environment (v2024.12.1 + 563).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and discussion: </strong>This trial aims to provide Level I evidence comparing the respiratory depression risk between esketamine-based and fentanyl-based analgesia during HHNB-guided liver ablation. Should esketamine prove to be demonstrably superior in terms of respiratory safety, HHNB-esketamine has the potential to be a viable treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1644029"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esketamine versus fentanyl as adjuncts to hepatic hilar nerve block for ambulatory percutaneous liver tumor ablation focusing on respiratory safety: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Wang, Lijuan Yan, Jiaying Cai, Jianfei Wei, Zuobing Zhang, Bin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphar.2025.1644029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) is a critical safety concern during ambulatory percutaneous liver tumor thermal ablation. Esketamine has been shown to offer a promising opioid-sparing alternative with the potential to provide respiratory stability benefits. We hypothesize that hepatic hilar nerve block (HHNB) combined with esketamine will reduce the incidence of respiratory depression when compared to HHNB in conjunction with fentanyl in this particular context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) will enroll patients undergoing ambulatory ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver thermal ablation. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either intravenous esketamine 0.37 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> (Intervention group) or intravenous fentanyl 1 μg·kg<sup>-</sup> (Control group). All subjects will receive a standardized premedication consisting of midazolam 0.03 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IV, followed by ultrasound-guided HHNB.</p><p><strong>Results and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome is the incidence of respiratory depression, defined as SpO<sub>2</sub> <90% or EtCO<sub>2</sub> >55 mmHg. Secondary outcomes include the rate of anesthesia success, postoperative pain scores, and the consumption of remedial analgesia at 2, 6, and 24 h post-surgery. Additionally, satisfaction scores from both the sonographer and the patient are considered, along with any adverse events that may occur. The statistical analysis will utilize appropriate parametric/non-parametric tests for continuous data and chi-square/Fisher's exact tests for categorical data (significance p < 0.05), using SPSS (v20.0) and R (v4.4.3; R Foundation) within the RStudio environment (v2024.12.1 + 563).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and discussion: </strong>This trial aims to provide Level I evidence comparing the respiratory depression risk between esketamine-based and fentanyl-based analgesia during HHNB-guided liver ablation. Should esketamine prove to be demonstrably superior in terms of respiratory safety, HHNB-esketamine has the potential to be a viable treatment option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1644029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1644029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1644029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物诱导的呼吸抑制(OIRD)是动态经皮肝肿瘤热消融过程中一个关键的安全问题。艾氯胺酮已被证明是一种有希望的阿片类药物节约替代品,具有提供呼吸稳定益处的潜力。我们假设,在这种特殊情况下,与HHNB联合芬太尼相比,肝门神经阻滞(HHNB)联合艾氯胺酮可以减少呼吸抑制的发生率。方法:这项单中心、前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验(RCT)将招募接受超声引导下经皮肝热消融的患者。患者随机分为静脉注射艾氯胺酮0.37 mg kg-1(干预组)和静脉注射芬太尼1 μg·kg-(对照组)两组。所有受试者接受标准的药物前治疗,包括咪达唑仑0.03 mg kg-1 IV,随后进行超声引导HHNB。结果和分析:主要终点是呼吸抑制的发生率,定义为SpO2 2 bb0 55 mmHg。次要结局包括麻醉成功率、术后疼痛评分以及术后2、6和24小时的镇痛用量。此外,还要考虑超声医师和患者的满意度评分,以及可能发生的任何不良事件。统计分析将在RStudio环境(v2024.12.1 + 563)中使用SPSS (v20.0)和R (v4.4.3; R Foundation),对连续数据使用适当的参数/非参数检验,对分类数据使用卡方/Fisher精确检验(显著性p < 0.05)。结论与讨论:本试验旨在提供一级证据,比较艾氯胺酮和芬太尼在hhnb引导下肝消融时的呼吸抑制风险。如果艾氯胺酮在呼吸安全方面被证明具有明显的优势,hhnb艾氯胺酮有可能成为一种可行的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Esketamine versus fentanyl as adjuncts to hepatic hilar nerve block for ambulatory percutaneous liver tumor ablation focusing on respiratory safety: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) is a critical safety concern during ambulatory percutaneous liver tumor thermal ablation. Esketamine has been shown to offer a promising opioid-sparing alternative with the potential to provide respiratory stability benefits. We hypothesize that hepatic hilar nerve block (HHNB) combined with esketamine will reduce the incidence of respiratory depression when compared to HHNB in conjunction with fentanyl in this particular context.

Methods: This single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) will enroll patients undergoing ambulatory ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver thermal ablation. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either intravenous esketamine 0.37 mg kg-1 (Intervention group) or intravenous fentanyl 1 μg·kg- (Control group). All subjects will receive a standardized premedication consisting of midazolam 0.03 mg kg-1 IV, followed by ultrasound-guided HHNB.

Results and analysis: The primary outcome is the incidence of respiratory depression, defined as SpO2 <90% or EtCO2 >55 mmHg. Secondary outcomes include the rate of anesthesia success, postoperative pain scores, and the consumption of remedial analgesia at 2, 6, and 24 h post-surgery. Additionally, satisfaction scores from both the sonographer and the patient are considered, along with any adverse events that may occur. The statistical analysis will utilize appropriate parametric/non-parametric tests for continuous data and chi-square/Fisher's exact tests for categorical data (significance p < 0.05), using SPSS (v20.0) and R (v4.4.3; R Foundation) within the RStudio environment (v2024.12.1 + 563).

Conclusion and discussion: This trial aims to provide Level I evidence comparing the respiratory depression risk between esketamine-based and fentanyl-based analgesia during HHNB-guided liver ablation. Should esketamine prove to be demonstrably superior in terms of respiratory safety, HHNB-esketamine has the potential to be a viable treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信