Ella Zomer, Jedidiah I Morton, Lei Chen, Stella Talic, Sybil A McAuley, Elizabeth A Davis, Timothy W Jones, Kate E Lomax, Dianna J Magliano, Jonathan E Shaw, Sophia Zoungas
{"title":"1型糖尿病患者用药与社会经济劣势的关系:国家关联数据集分析","authors":"Ella Zomer, Jedidiah I Morton, Lei Chen, Stella Talic, Sybil A McAuley, Elizabeth A Davis, Timothy W Jones, Kate E Lomax, Dianna J Magliano, Jonathan E Shaw, Sophia Zoungas","doi":"10.1177/15209156251383516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To explore trends in the receipt of commonly prescribed medications (beyond insulin) in people with type 1 diabetes in Australia, including polypharmacy, and to investigate socioeconomic disparities across these trends. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of 68,287 people with type 1 diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Services Scheme between 2013 and 2019, and linked to the Australian pharmaceutical claims database to capture medication use. The proportion of people with type 1 diabetes dispensed a medication class was assessed in each year, and by levels of Index of Relative Social Disadvantage. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study population comprised 37,055 (54.3%) males and 31,232 (45.7%) females captured between 2013 and 2019, with an overall median age of 38.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 26.1-53.3) years and median diabetes duration of 17.0 (IQR: 7.9-25.7) years. The median number of medications used in the study population was five (IQR: 3-8). Trends in receipt of commonly prescribed medications remained relatively stable between 2013 and 2019, except for the use of noninsulin (adjuvant) glucose-lowering agents, which increased. In 2019, compared with people in the least disadvantaged areas, those in the most disadvantaged areas were more likely to be receiving adjuvant glucose-lowering therapy (crude rates 21.5% vs. 11.6%), antihypertensive therapies (36.1% vs. 28.8%), lipid-lowering therapies (35.7% vs. 29.7%), antithrombotic medication (8.9% vs. 5.6%), proton pump inhibitors (25.2% vs. 17.1%), medications for asthma (13.2% vs. 8.4%), and medications for mental health (27.5% vs. 21.5%). Polypharmacy (defined as ≥5 medications) was more likely in those in the most disadvantaged areas compared with those in the least disadvantaged areas (58.8% vs. 48.5%). Even after adjustment for patient factors, differences in medication use and polypharmacy across socioeconomic strata persisted. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Receipt of commonly prescribed medications in type 1 diabetes and polypharmacy were associated with increased socioeconomic disadvantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication Use in Type 1 Diabetes and the Association with Socioeconomic Disadvantage: Analysis of a National Linked Dataset.\",\"authors\":\"Ella Zomer, Jedidiah I Morton, Lei Chen, Stella Talic, Sybil A McAuley, Elizabeth A Davis, Timothy W Jones, Kate E Lomax, Dianna J Magliano, Jonathan E Shaw, Sophia Zoungas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15209156251383516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To explore trends in the receipt of commonly prescribed medications (beyond insulin) in people with type 1 diabetes in Australia, including polypharmacy, and to investigate socioeconomic disparities across these trends. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of 68,287 people with type 1 diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Services Scheme between 2013 and 2019, and linked to the Australian pharmaceutical claims database to capture medication use. The proportion of people with type 1 diabetes dispensed a medication class was assessed in each year, and by levels of Index of Relative Social Disadvantage. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study population comprised 37,055 (54.3%) males and 31,232 (45.7%) females captured between 2013 and 2019, with an overall median age of 38.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 26.1-53.3) years and median diabetes duration of 17.0 (IQR: 7.9-25.7) years. The median number of medications used in the study population was five (IQR: 3-8). Trends in receipt of commonly prescribed medications remained relatively stable between 2013 and 2019, except for the use of noninsulin (adjuvant) glucose-lowering agents, which increased. In 2019, compared with people in the least disadvantaged areas, those in the most disadvantaged areas were more likely to be receiving adjuvant glucose-lowering therapy (crude rates 21.5% vs. 11.6%), antihypertensive therapies (36.1% vs. 28.8%), lipid-lowering therapies (35.7% vs. 29.7%), antithrombotic medication (8.9% vs. 5.6%), proton pump inhibitors (25.2% vs. 17.1%), medications for asthma (13.2% vs. 8.4%), and medications for mental health (27.5% vs. 21.5%). Polypharmacy (defined as ≥5 medications) was more likely in those in the most disadvantaged areas compared with those in the least disadvantaged areas (58.8% vs. 48.5%). Even after adjustment for patient factors, differences in medication use and polypharmacy across socioeconomic strata persisted. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Receipt of commonly prescribed medications in type 1 diabetes and polypharmacy were associated with increased socioeconomic disadvantage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251383516\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251383516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Medication Use in Type 1 Diabetes and the Association with Socioeconomic Disadvantage: Analysis of a National Linked Dataset.
Objectives: To explore trends in the receipt of commonly prescribed medications (beyond insulin) in people with type 1 diabetes in Australia, including polypharmacy, and to investigate socioeconomic disparities across these trends. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 68,287 people with type 1 diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Services Scheme between 2013 and 2019, and linked to the Australian pharmaceutical claims database to capture medication use. The proportion of people with type 1 diabetes dispensed a medication class was assessed in each year, and by levels of Index of Relative Social Disadvantage. Results: The study population comprised 37,055 (54.3%) males and 31,232 (45.7%) females captured between 2013 and 2019, with an overall median age of 38.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 26.1-53.3) years and median diabetes duration of 17.0 (IQR: 7.9-25.7) years. The median number of medications used in the study population was five (IQR: 3-8). Trends in receipt of commonly prescribed medications remained relatively stable between 2013 and 2019, except for the use of noninsulin (adjuvant) glucose-lowering agents, which increased. In 2019, compared with people in the least disadvantaged areas, those in the most disadvantaged areas were more likely to be receiving adjuvant glucose-lowering therapy (crude rates 21.5% vs. 11.6%), antihypertensive therapies (36.1% vs. 28.8%), lipid-lowering therapies (35.7% vs. 29.7%), antithrombotic medication (8.9% vs. 5.6%), proton pump inhibitors (25.2% vs. 17.1%), medications for asthma (13.2% vs. 8.4%), and medications for mental health (27.5% vs. 21.5%). Polypharmacy (defined as ≥5 medications) was more likely in those in the most disadvantaged areas compared with those in the least disadvantaged areas (58.8% vs. 48.5%). Even after adjustment for patient factors, differences in medication use and polypharmacy across socioeconomic strata persisted. Conclusions: Receipt of commonly prescribed medications in type 1 diabetes and polypharmacy were associated with increased socioeconomic disadvantage.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.