策略的影响,以提高流量和降低住院的腰痛在急诊科:中断时间序列分析。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Simon R E Davidson, Steven Kamper, Robin Haskins, Dragan Petkovic, Nicole Feenan, Damien Smith, Michael O'Flynn, Jeremy D Pallas, Bruce Donald, John Paul Smiles, Gustavo Machado, Christopher Oldmeadow, Christopher M Williams
{"title":"策略的影响,以提高流量和降低住院的腰痛在急诊科:中断时间序列分析。","authors":"Simon R E Davidson, Steven Kamper, Robin Haskins, Dragan Petkovic, Nicole Feenan, Damien Smith, Michael O'Flynn, Jeremy D Pallas, Bruce Donald, John Paul Smiles, Gustavo Machado, Christopher Oldmeadow, Christopher M Williams","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a common, disabling condition that often results in presentation to the emergency department (ED). There is currently a paucity of research examining how to optimise care for this patient group and concurrently improve service efficiency. We assessed the impact of a suite of co-designed strategies to improve the flow and reduce admission rate of people with LBP presenting to the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental implementation science study in a 30-bed ED at an Australian tertiary referral hospital. We implemented four improvement strategies: (1) co-design and development of a local ED guideline, (2) patient handout, (3) clinician education programme and (4) rapid-access physiotherapy follow-up clinic. We included all ED presentations from patients ≥16 years old, with a final diagnosis of LBP. Using an interrupted time series analysis, we compared a pre-implementation phase (July 2014-December 2019), a transition phase (July 2020-February 2021) and a post implementation phase (March 2021-November 2021). Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients admitted to hospital, in each phase. Secondary outcomes included ED length of stay (LOS), ED presentation cost, re-presentations within five days, admission LOS and outcome measures for those patients who attended the rapid-access physiotherapy clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 5301 LBP presentations pre-implementation, 752 during transition and 732 post implementation. The mean age of patients was 50.3 (20.1) years, 53% were female and 6.5% identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. We observed a small reduction (2%) in the proportion of admissions per month (post implementation vs pre-implementation slope difference 0.98 ((95% CI 0.928 to 1.035), p=0.467) and a monthly decrease of 1.5 min in the average ED LOS for these patients (post implementation vs pre-implementation slope difference -1.5 ((95% CI -8.1 to 5.1), p=0.653) which was not statistically significant. 121 patients were referred to the follow-up physiotherapy clinic, and 41% attended an appointment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improvement strategies did not significantly reduce admissions or LOS for people with LBP presenting to the ED, and based on the CIs, we cannot exclude that these increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of strategies to improve flow and lower hospital admissions for low back pain in the emergency department: an interrupted time-series analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Simon R E Davidson, Steven Kamper, Robin Haskins, Dragan Petkovic, Nicole Feenan, Damien Smith, Michael O'Flynn, Jeremy D Pallas, Bruce Donald, John Paul Smiles, Gustavo Machado, Christopher Oldmeadow, Christopher M Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2024-214082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a common, disabling condition that often results in presentation to the emergency department (ED). There is currently a paucity of research examining how to optimise care for this patient group and concurrently improve service efficiency. We assessed the impact of a suite of co-designed strategies to improve the flow and reduce admission rate of people with LBP presenting to the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental implementation science study in a 30-bed ED at an Australian tertiary referral hospital. We implemented four improvement strategies: (1) co-design and development of a local ED guideline, (2) patient handout, (3) clinician education programme and (4) rapid-access physiotherapy follow-up clinic. We included all ED presentations from patients ≥16 years old, with a final diagnosis of LBP. Using an interrupted time series analysis, we compared a pre-implementation phase (July 2014-December 2019), a transition phase (July 2020-February 2021) and a post implementation phase (March 2021-November 2021). Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients admitted to hospital, in each phase. Secondary outcomes included ED length of stay (LOS), ED presentation cost, re-presentations within five days, admission LOS and outcome measures for those patients who attended the rapid-access physiotherapy clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 5301 LBP presentations pre-implementation, 752 during transition and 732 post implementation. The mean age of patients was 50.3 (20.1) years, 53% were female and 6.5% identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. We observed a small reduction (2%) in the proportion of admissions per month (post implementation vs pre-implementation slope difference 0.98 ((95% CI 0.928 to 1.035), p=0.467) and a monthly decrease of 1.5 min in the average ED LOS for these patients (post implementation vs pre-implementation slope difference -1.5 ((95% CI -8.1 to 5.1), p=0.653) which was not statistically significant. 121 patients were referred to the follow-up physiotherapy clinic, and 41% attended an appointment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improvement strategies did not significantly reduce admissions or LOS for people with LBP presenting to the ED, and based on the CIs, we cannot exclude that these increased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰痛(LBP)是一种常见的致残疾病,经常导致急诊科(ED)的出现。目前缺乏关于如何优化对这一患者群体的护理并同时提高服务效率的研究。我们评估了一套共同设计的策略对改善LBP患者到ED就诊的流量和降低入院率的影响。方法:在澳大利亚一家三级转诊医院的30张床位的ED进行准实验实施科学研究。我们实施了四项改进策略:(1)共同设计和制定当地ED指南,(2)患者讲义,(3)临床医生教育计划和(4)快速获得物理治疗随访诊所。我们纳入了所有年龄≥16岁、最终诊断为腰痛的ED患者。使用中断时间序列分析,我们比较了实施前阶段(2014年7月至2019年12月)、过渡阶段(2020年7月至2021年2月)和实施后阶段(2021年3月至2021年11月)。我们的主要结局是每个阶段住院患者的比例。次要结局包括急诊科住院时间(LOS)、急诊科就诊费用、5天内再次就诊时间、入院时间(LOS)和在快速通道物理治疗诊所就诊的患者的结局指标。结果:LBP实施前5301例,过渡期752例,实施后732例。患者平均年龄为50.3(20.1)岁,53%为女性,6.5%为原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民。我们观察到每月入院比例小幅下降(2%)(实施后与实施前斜率差0.98 (95% CI 0.928至1.035),p=0.467),这些患者的平均ED LOS每月下降1.5分钟(实施后与实施前斜率差-1.5 (95% CI -8.1至5.1),p=0.653),无统计学意义。121名患者被转介到随访理疗诊所,41%的患者参加了预约。结论:改善策略并没有显著降低就诊于急诊科的LBP患者的入院率或LOS,基于ci,我们不能排除这些患者的入院率或LOS有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of strategies to improve flow and lower hospital admissions for low back pain in the emergency department: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common, disabling condition that often results in presentation to the emergency department (ED). There is currently a paucity of research examining how to optimise care for this patient group and concurrently improve service efficiency. We assessed the impact of a suite of co-designed strategies to improve the flow and reduce admission rate of people with LBP presenting to the ED.

Methods: A quasi-experimental implementation science study in a 30-bed ED at an Australian tertiary referral hospital. We implemented four improvement strategies: (1) co-design and development of a local ED guideline, (2) patient handout, (3) clinician education programme and (4) rapid-access physiotherapy follow-up clinic. We included all ED presentations from patients ≥16 years old, with a final diagnosis of LBP. Using an interrupted time series analysis, we compared a pre-implementation phase (July 2014-December 2019), a transition phase (July 2020-February 2021) and a post implementation phase (March 2021-November 2021). Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients admitted to hospital, in each phase. Secondary outcomes included ED length of stay (LOS), ED presentation cost, re-presentations within five days, admission LOS and outcome measures for those patients who attended the rapid-access physiotherapy clinic.

Results: There were 5301 LBP presentations pre-implementation, 752 during transition and 732 post implementation. The mean age of patients was 50.3 (20.1) years, 53% were female and 6.5% identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. We observed a small reduction (2%) in the proportion of admissions per month (post implementation vs pre-implementation slope difference 0.98 ((95% CI 0.928 to 1.035), p=0.467) and a monthly decrease of 1.5 min in the average ED LOS for these patients (post implementation vs pre-implementation slope difference -1.5 ((95% CI -8.1 to 5.1), p=0.653) which was not statistically significant. 121 patients were referred to the follow-up physiotherapy clinic, and 41% attended an appointment.

Conclusion: The improvement strategies did not significantly reduce admissions or LOS for people with LBP presenting to the ED, and based on the CIs, we cannot exclude that these increased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信