基于自身抗体的无创检测afp阴性肝细胞癌nomogram:一项多中心研究。

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Keyan Wang, Wenzhuo Xiong, Xuehui Duan, Qing Li, Pengfei Ren, Hua Ye, Jingjing Liu, Renle Du, Jianxiang Shi, Peng Wang, Liping Dai
{"title":"基于自身抗体的无创检测afp阴性肝细胞癌nomogram:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Keyan Wang, Wenzhuo Xiong, Xuehui Duan, Qing Li, Pengfei Ren, Hua Ye, Jingjing Liu, Renle Du, Jianxiang Shi, Peng Wang, Liping Dai","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03215-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging. Autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens have been extensively investigated as serum biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed serological proteome analysis and protein microarray to identify potential autoantibodies for HCC, followed by a two-center and two-independent-phase validation and evaluation using ELISA in patients with AFP-negative HCC (ANHCC). LASSO regression addressed multicollinearity among biomarkers. Four machine-learning methods developed diagnostic models for ANHCC. ROC analysis and various evaluation indicators were applied to assess the performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight autoantibodies out of sixteen candidates, including Survivin, NPM1, GNAS, SRSF2, GNA11, PTCH1, GAPDH, and HSP90, were validated as superior biomarkers. The Logistic regression model was optimal for ANHCC, achieving an area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.883 in the training dataset and an AUC of 0.840 in the validation dataset. When tested on the entire HCC patient cohort, which included both ANHCC and AFP-positive patients (APHCC), with ANHCC accounting for 37.5%, the AUC reached 0.825, with a sensitivity of 66.4%, and a specificity of 84.2%. Combining this model with AFP improved efficacy, yielding an AUC of 0.945, an IDI of 23.1%, and an NRI of 21.1% compared to using AFP alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Logistic regression model demonstrates superior diagnostic performance for ANHCC. Integrating this model with AFP enhances the entire HCC diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nomogram based on autoantibodies for noninvasive detection of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Keyan Wang, Wenzhuo Xiong, Xuehui Duan, Qing Li, Pengfei Ren, Hua Ye, Jingjing Liu, Renle Du, Jianxiang Shi, Peng Wang, Liping Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41416-025-03215-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging. Autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens have been extensively investigated as serum biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed serological proteome analysis and protein microarray to identify potential autoantibodies for HCC, followed by a two-center and two-independent-phase validation and evaluation using ELISA in patients with AFP-negative HCC (ANHCC). LASSO regression addressed multicollinearity among biomarkers. Four machine-learning methods developed diagnostic models for ANHCC. ROC analysis and various evaluation indicators were applied to assess the performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight autoantibodies out of sixteen candidates, including Survivin, NPM1, GNAS, SRSF2, GNA11, PTCH1, GAPDH, and HSP90, were validated as superior biomarkers. The Logistic regression model was optimal for ANHCC, achieving an area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.883 in the training dataset and an AUC of 0.840 in the validation dataset. When tested on the entire HCC patient cohort, which included both ANHCC and AFP-positive patients (APHCC), with ANHCC accounting for 37.5%, the AUC reached 0.825, with a sensitivity of 66.4%, and a specificity of 84.2%. Combining this model with AFP improved efficacy, yielding an AUC of 0.945, an IDI of 23.1%, and an NRI of 21.1% compared to using AFP alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Logistic regression model demonstrates superior diagnostic performance for ANHCC. Integrating this model with AFP enhances the entire HCC diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03215-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03215-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:afp阴性肝细胞癌(HCC)的诊断具有挑战性。针对肿瘤相关抗原的自身抗体作为血清生物标志物已被广泛研究。方法:采用血清学蛋白质组学分析和蛋白质微阵列技术鉴定潜在的HCC自身抗体,随后采用ELISA对afp阴性HCC (ANHCC)患者进行双中心、两独立期验证和评估。LASSO回归解决了生物标志物之间的多重共线性。四种机器学习方法建立了ANHCC的诊断模型。运用ROC分析及各种评价指标对绩效进行评价。结果:在16种候选抗体中,有8种自身抗体(包括Survivin、NPM1、GNAS、SRSF2、GNA11、PTCH1、GAPDH和HSP90)被证实为优越的生物标志物。Logistic回归模型对ANHCC最优,训练数据集的ROC下面积(AUC)为0.883,验证数据集的AUC为0.840。在包括ANHCC和afp阳性患者(APHCC)在内的整个HCC患者队列中,ANHCC占37.5%,AUC达到0.825,敏感性为66.4%,特异性为84.2%。与单独使用AFP相比,将该模型与AFP联合使用可提高疗效,AUC为0.945,IDI为23.1%,NRI为21.1%。结论:Logistic回归模型对ANHCC具有较好的诊断效果。将该模型与AFP结合可提高HCC的整体诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A nomogram based on autoantibodies for noninvasive detection of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.

Background: Diagnosing AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging. Autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens have been extensively investigated as serum biomarkers.

Methods: We employed serological proteome analysis and protein microarray to identify potential autoantibodies for HCC, followed by a two-center and two-independent-phase validation and evaluation using ELISA in patients with AFP-negative HCC (ANHCC). LASSO regression addressed multicollinearity among biomarkers. Four machine-learning methods developed diagnostic models for ANHCC. ROC analysis and various evaluation indicators were applied to assess the performance.

Results: Eight autoantibodies out of sixteen candidates, including Survivin, NPM1, GNAS, SRSF2, GNA11, PTCH1, GAPDH, and HSP90, were validated as superior biomarkers. The Logistic regression model was optimal for ANHCC, achieving an area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.883 in the training dataset and an AUC of 0.840 in the validation dataset. When tested on the entire HCC patient cohort, which included both ANHCC and AFP-positive patients (APHCC), with ANHCC accounting for 37.5%, the AUC reached 0.825, with a sensitivity of 66.4%, and a specificity of 84.2%. Combining this model with AFP improved efficacy, yielding an AUC of 0.945, an IDI of 23.1%, and an NRI of 21.1% compared to using AFP alone.

Conclusion: The Logistic regression model demonstrates superior diagnostic performance for ANHCC. Integrating this model with AFP enhances the entire HCC diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信