Emmanuel P Dollinger, Kai Silkwood, Scott Atwood, Qing Nie, Arthur D Lander
{"title":"单细胞转录组学的统计学原则特征选择。","authors":"Emmanuel P Dollinger, Kai Silkwood, Scott Atwood, Qing Nie, Arthur D Lander","doi":"10.1186/s12859-025-06240-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high dimensionality of data in single cell transcriptomics (scRNAseq) requires investigators to choose subsets of genes (\"feature selection\") for downstream analysis (e.g., unsupervised cell clustering). The evaluation of different approaches to feature selection is hampered by the fact that, as we show here, the difficulty of feature selection can vary greatly, depending on the dataset being analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For routine cell type identification, even randomly chosen features can perform well, but for cell type differences that are subtle, both number of features and selection strategy matter strongly. We present a simple feature selection method grounded in an analytical model that allows for interpretable delineation of how many and which features to choose, facilitating identification of biologically meaningful rare cell types. We compare this method to default methods in scanpy and Seurat, as well as SCTransform, showing how greater accuracy can often be achieved with surprisingly few, well-chosen features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feature selection is a critical step in scRNAseq for downstream analyses. We explore the pitfalls that can arise from incautious feature selection and present a statistical method to facilitate improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8958,"journal":{"name":"BMC Bioinformatics","volume":"26 1","pages":"238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistically principled feature selection for single cell transcriptomics.\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel P Dollinger, Kai Silkwood, Scott Atwood, Qing Nie, Arthur D Lander\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12859-025-06240-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high dimensionality of data in single cell transcriptomics (scRNAseq) requires investigators to choose subsets of genes (\\\"feature selection\\\") for downstream analysis (e.g., unsupervised cell clustering). The evaluation of different approaches to feature selection is hampered by the fact that, as we show here, the difficulty of feature selection can vary greatly, depending on the dataset being analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For routine cell type identification, even randomly chosen features can perform well, but for cell type differences that are subtle, both number of features and selection strategy matter strongly. We present a simple feature selection method grounded in an analytical model that allows for interpretable delineation of how many and which features to choose, facilitating identification of biologically meaningful rare cell types. We compare this method to default methods in scanpy and Seurat, as well as SCTransform, showing how greater accuracy can often be achieved with surprisingly few, well-chosen features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feature selection is a critical step in scRNAseq for downstream analyses. We explore the pitfalls that can arise from incautious feature selection and present a statistical method to facilitate improved outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06240-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06240-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Statistically principled feature selection for single cell transcriptomics.
Background: The high dimensionality of data in single cell transcriptomics (scRNAseq) requires investigators to choose subsets of genes ("feature selection") for downstream analysis (e.g., unsupervised cell clustering). The evaluation of different approaches to feature selection is hampered by the fact that, as we show here, the difficulty of feature selection can vary greatly, depending on the dataset being analyzed.
Results: For routine cell type identification, even randomly chosen features can perform well, but for cell type differences that are subtle, both number of features and selection strategy matter strongly. We present a simple feature selection method grounded in an analytical model that allows for interpretable delineation of how many and which features to choose, facilitating identification of biologically meaningful rare cell types. We compare this method to default methods in scanpy and Seurat, as well as SCTransform, showing how greater accuracy can often be achieved with surprisingly few, well-chosen features.
Conclusions: Feature selection is a critical step in scRNAseq for downstream analyses. We explore the pitfalls that can arise from incautious feature selection and present a statistical method to facilitate improved outcomes.
期刊介绍:
BMC Bioinformatics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the development, testing and novel application of computational and statistical methods for the modeling and analysis of all kinds of biological data, as well as other areas of computational biology.
BMC Bioinformatics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.