过氧化物酶肽反应性测定(PPRA)的适用领域:化学结构分析和肽耗尽模式分组。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Gang Yan, Petra S Kern, Kim Ellingson, Mengying Zhang, G Frank Gerberick, Isabelle Lee, Cindy Ryan, Isabella Schember
{"title":"过氧化物酶肽反应性测定(PPRA)的适用领域:化学结构分析和肽耗尽模式分组。","authors":"Gang Yan, Petra S Kern, Kim Ellingson, Mengying Zhang, G Frank Gerberick, Isabelle Lee, Cindy Ryan, Isabella Schember","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin sensitization is a critical endpoint in human safety risk assessment of chemicals. Risk assessment approaches have evolved, and the field has seen a shift toward adopting new approach methods (NAMs) instead of relying solely on animal or human data. While the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is considered one of the NAMs of key event (KE) 1 within the OECD guideline 497 in combination with other NAMs for predicting skin sensitization hazard or potency, the assay is limited by the lack of activation features for pre-/pro-haptens. To address this, the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay (PPRA) was developed, utilizing horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to facilitate the oxidation and activation of test substances. However, limited information is available on the chemical substrate scope and applicability domain of the PPRA. In this study, we investigated the substrate scope of HRP to gain insights into the mechanism of the PPRA. Based on our analysis, the substrates of HRP include substituted phenols (or aromatic alcohols) and aniline (or aromatic amines) as well as their O- or N-alkyl derivatives. By considering the substrate scope of HRP, depletion patterns and mechanisms in the DPRA/PPRA, and the underlying chemistry of the assays, we categorized chemicals into five distinct chemical groups with unique structural features and depletion patterns in the DPRA/PPRA. This study elucidates the relationship between chemical structures, assay results of the DPRA and PPRA, and their applicability for predicting the skin sensitization potential. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the predictive capabilities of the PPRA and provide valuable insights for incorporating PPRA into next-generation risk assessments (NGRAs).</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability Domain of Peroxidase Peptide Reactivity Assay (PPRA): Chemical Structure Analysis and Grouping of Peptide Depletion Patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Gang Yan, Petra S Kern, Kim Ellingson, Mengying Zhang, G Frank Gerberick, Isabelle Lee, Cindy Ryan, Isabella Schember\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Skin sensitization is a critical endpoint in human safety risk assessment of chemicals. Risk assessment approaches have evolved, and the field has seen a shift toward adopting new approach methods (NAMs) instead of relying solely on animal or human data. While the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is considered one of the NAMs of key event (KE) 1 within the OECD guideline 497 in combination with other NAMs for predicting skin sensitization hazard or potency, the assay is limited by the lack of activation features for pre-/pro-haptens. To address this, the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay (PPRA) was developed, utilizing horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to facilitate the oxidation and activation of test substances. However, limited information is available on the chemical substrate scope and applicability domain of the PPRA. In this study, we investigated the substrate scope of HRP to gain insights into the mechanism of the PPRA. Based on our analysis, the substrates of HRP include substituted phenols (or aromatic alcohols) and aniline (or aromatic amines) as well as their O- or N-alkyl derivatives. By considering the substrate scope of HRP, depletion patterns and mechanisms in the DPRA/PPRA, and the underlying chemistry of the assays, we categorized chemicals into five distinct chemical groups with unique structural features and depletion patterns in the DPRA/PPRA. This study elucidates the relationship between chemical structures, assay results of the DPRA and PPRA, and their applicability for predicting the skin sensitization potential. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the predictive capabilities of the PPRA and provide valuable insights for incorporating PPRA into next-generation risk assessments (NGRAs).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00321\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

皮肤致敏是化学品人体安全风险评估的一个重要终点。风险评估方法已经发展,该领域已经转向采用新的方法方法(NAMs),而不是仅仅依靠动物或人类数据。虽然直接肽反应性测定法(DPRA)被认为是OECD指南497中关键事件(KE) 1的NAMs之一,与其他NAMs结合用于预测皮肤致敏危害或效力,但该测定法由于缺乏前半抗原/前半抗原的激活特征而受到限制。为了解决这个问题,开发了过氧化物酶肽反应性测定(PPRA),利用辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)和H2O2促进被试物质的氧化和活化。然而,关于PPRA的化学基质范围和适用领域的信息有限。在这项研究中,我们研究了HRP的底物范围,以深入了解PPRA的机制。根据我们的分析,HRP的底物包括取代酚(或芳香醇)和苯胺(或芳香胺)以及它们的O-或n -烷基衍生物。考虑到HRP的底物范围、DPRA/PPRA中的耗竭模式和机制,以及检测的基础化学成分,我们将化学物质分为5个不同的化学基团,它们在DPRA/PPRA中具有独特的结构特征和耗竭模式。本研究阐明了DPRA和PPRA的化学结构、测定结果之间的关系,以及它们在预测皮肤致敏电位方面的适用性。这些发现有助于更好地理解PPRA的预测能力,并为将PPRA纳入下一代风险评估(NGRAs)提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability Domain of Peroxidase Peptide Reactivity Assay (PPRA): Chemical Structure Analysis and Grouping of Peptide Depletion Patterns.

Skin sensitization is a critical endpoint in human safety risk assessment of chemicals. Risk assessment approaches have evolved, and the field has seen a shift toward adopting new approach methods (NAMs) instead of relying solely on animal or human data. While the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is considered one of the NAMs of key event (KE) 1 within the OECD guideline 497 in combination with other NAMs for predicting skin sensitization hazard or potency, the assay is limited by the lack of activation features for pre-/pro-haptens. To address this, the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay (PPRA) was developed, utilizing horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and H2O2 to facilitate the oxidation and activation of test substances. However, limited information is available on the chemical substrate scope and applicability domain of the PPRA. In this study, we investigated the substrate scope of HRP to gain insights into the mechanism of the PPRA. Based on our analysis, the substrates of HRP include substituted phenols (or aromatic alcohols) and aniline (or aromatic amines) as well as their O- or N-alkyl derivatives. By considering the substrate scope of HRP, depletion patterns and mechanisms in the DPRA/PPRA, and the underlying chemistry of the assays, we categorized chemicals into five distinct chemical groups with unique structural features and depletion patterns in the DPRA/PPRA. This study elucidates the relationship between chemical structures, assay results of the DPRA and PPRA, and their applicability for predicting the skin sensitization potential. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the predictive capabilities of the PPRA and provide valuable insights for incorporating PPRA into next-generation risk assessments (NGRAs).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信