基于gwas的数据整合和非编码CRISPRi筛选阐明了骨矿物质密度的遗传病因

IF 10.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Mitchell Conery, James A. Pippin, Yadav Wagley, Khanh Trang, Matthew C. Pahl, David A. Villani, Lacey J. Favazzo, Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell, Michael J. Zuscik, Eugene Katsevich, Andrew D. Wells, Babette S. Zemel, Benjamin F. Voight, Kurt D. Hankenson, Alessandra Chesi, Struan F. A. Grant
{"title":"基于gwas的数据整合和非编码CRISPRi筛选阐明了骨矿物质密度的遗传病因","authors":"Mitchell Conery, James A. Pippin, Yadav Wagley, Khanh Trang, Matthew C. Pahl, David A. Villani, Lacey J. Favazzo, Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell, Michael J. Zuscik, Eugene Katsevich, Andrew D. Wells, Babette S. Zemel, Benjamin F. Voight, Kurt D. Hankenson, Alessandra Chesi, Struan F. A. Grant","doi":"10.1186/s13059-025-03802-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over 1100 independent signals have been identified with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for bone mineral density (BMD), a key risk factor for mortality-increasing fragility fractures; however, the effector gene(s) for most remain unknown. We execute a CRISPRi screen in human fetal osteoblasts (hFOBs) with single-cell RNA-seq read-out for 89 non-coding elements predicted to regulate osteoblast gene expression at BMD GWAS loci. The BMD relevance of hFOBs is supported by heritability enrichment from stratified LD-score regression involving 98 cell types grouped into 15 tissues. Twenty-three genes show perturbation in the screen, with four (ARID5B, CC2D1B, EIF4G2, and NCOA3) exhibiting consistent effects upon siRNA knockdown on three measures of osteoblast maturation and mineralization. Lastly, additional heritability enrichments, genetic correlations, and multi-trait fine-mapping unexpectedly reveal that many BMD GWAS signals are pleiotropic and likely mediate their effects via non-bone tissues. Our results provide a roadmap for how single-cell CRISPRi screens may be applied to the challenging task of resolving effector gene identities at all BMD GWAS loci. Extending our CRISPRi screening approach to other tissues could play a key role in fully elucidating the etiology of BMD.","PeriodicalId":12611,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":"220 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GWAS-informed data integration and non-coding CRISPRi screen illuminate genetic etiology of bone mineral density\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell Conery, James A. Pippin, Yadav Wagley, Khanh Trang, Matthew C. Pahl, David A. Villani, Lacey J. Favazzo, Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell, Michael J. Zuscik, Eugene Katsevich, Andrew D. Wells, Babette S. Zemel, Benjamin F. Voight, Kurt D. Hankenson, Alessandra Chesi, Struan F. A. Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13059-025-03802-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over 1100 independent signals have been identified with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for bone mineral density (BMD), a key risk factor for mortality-increasing fragility fractures; however, the effector gene(s) for most remain unknown. We execute a CRISPRi screen in human fetal osteoblasts (hFOBs) with single-cell RNA-seq read-out for 89 non-coding elements predicted to regulate osteoblast gene expression at BMD GWAS loci. The BMD relevance of hFOBs is supported by heritability enrichment from stratified LD-score regression involving 98 cell types grouped into 15 tissues. Twenty-three genes show perturbation in the screen, with four (ARID5B, CC2D1B, EIF4G2, and NCOA3) exhibiting consistent effects upon siRNA knockdown on three measures of osteoblast maturation and mineralization. Lastly, additional heritability enrichments, genetic correlations, and multi-trait fine-mapping unexpectedly reveal that many BMD GWAS signals are pleiotropic and likely mediate their effects via non-bone tissues. Our results provide a roadmap for how single-cell CRISPRi screens may be applied to the challenging task of resolving effector gene identities at all BMD GWAS loci. Extending our CRISPRi screening approach to other tissues could play a key role in fully elucidating the etiology of BMD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome Biology\",\"volume\":\"220 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03802-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03802-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨矿物质密度(BMD)是导致死亡率增加的脆性骨折的一个关键危险因素,通过全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已鉴定出1100多个独立信号;然而,大多数的影响基因仍然未知。我们在人胎儿成骨细胞(hfob)中进行了CRISPRi筛选,通过单细胞RNA-seq读出89个非编码元件,预测这些元件可调节BMD GWAS位点的成骨细胞基因表达。hfob的骨密度相关性得到了分层ld评分回归的遗传力富集的支持,该回归涉及15个组织中的98种细胞类型。筛选结果显示23个基因受到干扰,其中4个基因(ARID5B、CC2D1B、EIF4G2和NCOA3)对siRNA敲低在成骨细胞成熟和矿化的3个指标上表现出一致的影响。最后,额外的遗传力富集、遗传相关性和多性状精细定位意外地揭示了许多BMD GWAS信号是多效性的,并且可能通过非骨组织介导其作用。我们的研究结果为单细胞CRISPRi筛选如何应用于解决所有BMD GWAS位点的效应基因身份这一具有挑战性的任务提供了路线图。将我们的CRISPRi筛选方法扩展到其他组织可能在充分阐明BMD病因学方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GWAS-informed data integration and non-coding CRISPRi screen illuminate genetic etiology of bone mineral density
Over 1100 independent signals have been identified with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for bone mineral density (BMD), a key risk factor for mortality-increasing fragility fractures; however, the effector gene(s) for most remain unknown. We execute a CRISPRi screen in human fetal osteoblasts (hFOBs) with single-cell RNA-seq read-out for 89 non-coding elements predicted to regulate osteoblast gene expression at BMD GWAS loci. The BMD relevance of hFOBs is supported by heritability enrichment from stratified LD-score regression involving 98 cell types grouped into 15 tissues. Twenty-three genes show perturbation in the screen, with four (ARID5B, CC2D1B, EIF4G2, and NCOA3) exhibiting consistent effects upon siRNA knockdown on three measures of osteoblast maturation and mineralization. Lastly, additional heritability enrichments, genetic correlations, and multi-trait fine-mapping unexpectedly reveal that many BMD GWAS signals are pleiotropic and likely mediate their effects via non-bone tissues. Our results provide a roadmap for how single-cell CRISPRi screens may be applied to the challenging task of resolving effector gene identities at all BMD GWAS loci. Extending our CRISPRi screening approach to other tissues could play a key role in fully elucidating the etiology of BMD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Biology
Genome Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
241
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Genome Biology stands as a premier platform for exceptional research across all domains of biology and biomedicine, explored through a genomic and post-genomic lens. With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022),* the journal secures its position as the 3rd-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category and the 2nd-ranked research journal in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category by Thomson Reuters. Notably, Genome Biology holds the distinction of being the highest-ranked open-access journal in this category. Our dedicated team of highly trained in-house Editors collaborates closely with our esteemed Editorial Board of international experts, ensuring the journal remains on the forefront of scientific advances and community standards. Regular engagement with researchers at conferences and institute visits underscores our commitment to staying abreast of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信