欧盟获得基因治疗的不平等:伦理和监管挑战。

IF 2.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Pub Date : 2025-09-30 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/jlb/lsaf018
Margaux Reckelbus, Riya Mohan, Phaedra Locquet, Eva Van Steijvoort, Isabelle Huys, Pascal Borry
{"title":"欧盟获得基因治疗的不平等:伦理和监管挑战。","authors":"Margaux Reckelbus, Riya Mohan, Phaedra Locquet, Eva Van Steijvoort, Isabelle Huys, Pascal Borry","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gene therapies represent a significant advancement in modern medicine, offering potential cures for untreatable genetic disorders. However, equitable access to these innovative therapies remains a critical ethical challenge within the European Union (EU). This paper examines the adequacy of the EU's centralized market authorization framework, supplemented by alternative pathways such as the Hospital Exemption and Compassionate Use Program, in addressing access disparities. While the centralized framework ensures high standards of safety, quality, and efficacy, its implementation reveals significant barriers related to affordability, geographical disparities, and fragmented national healthcare systems. High costs create financial obstacles for both healthcare systems and individuals, disproportionately affecting low-income countries and regions. Geographic disparities are further exacerbated by fragmented regulations and uneven healthcare infrastructures across member states, limiting patient access in rural areas. Alternative pathways, while designed to improve access, suffer from inconsistent national-level implementation. This paper argues that as the EU navigates the complexities of gene therapy regulation, it must focus on creating a more cohesive and inclusive framework. By doing so, it can ensure that the potential of gene therapies is realized in a manner that benefits all EU citizens, irrespective of their geographic or economic circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":56266,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","volume":"12 2","pages":"lsaf018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in access to gene therapy in the European Union: ethical and regulatory challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Margaux Reckelbus, Riya Mohan, Phaedra Locquet, Eva Van Steijvoort, Isabelle Huys, Pascal Borry\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jlb/lsaf018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gene therapies represent a significant advancement in modern medicine, offering potential cures for untreatable genetic disorders. However, equitable access to these innovative therapies remains a critical ethical challenge within the European Union (EU). This paper examines the adequacy of the EU's centralized market authorization framework, supplemented by alternative pathways such as the Hospital Exemption and Compassionate Use Program, in addressing access disparities. While the centralized framework ensures high standards of safety, quality, and efficacy, its implementation reveals significant barriers related to affordability, geographical disparities, and fragmented national healthcare systems. High costs create financial obstacles for both healthcare systems and individuals, disproportionately affecting low-income countries and regions. Geographic disparities are further exacerbated by fragmented regulations and uneven healthcare infrastructures across member states, limiting patient access in rural areas. Alternative pathways, while designed to improve access, suffer from inconsistent national-level implementation. This paper argues that as the EU navigates the complexities of gene therapy regulation, it must focus on creating a more cohesive and inclusive framework. By doing so, it can ensure that the potential of gene therapies is realized in a manner that benefits all EU citizens, irrespective of their geographic or economic circumstances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and the Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"lsaf018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and the Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaf018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaf018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因疗法代表了现代医学的重大进步,为无法治愈的遗传疾病提供了潜在的治疗方法。然而,公平获得这些创新疗法仍然是欧盟(EU)内部一个关键的伦理挑战。本文考察了欧盟集中市场授权框架的充分性,并辅以医院豁免和同情使用计划等替代途径,以解决获取差异。虽然集中式框架确保了高标准的安全性、质量和有效性,但其实施暴露出与可负担性、地理差异和分散的国家医疗保健系统相关的重大障碍。高昂的费用给卫生保健系统和个人造成了财政障碍,对低收入国家和地区的影响尤为严重。各成员国法规不统一和医疗基础设施不平衡进一步加剧了地域差异,限制了农村地区的患者就诊。其他途径虽然旨在改善可及性,但在国家层面的执行不一致。本文认为,在欧盟应对基因治疗监管的复杂性时,它必须专注于创建一个更具凝聚力和包容性的框架。通过这样做,它可以确保基因治疗的潜力以一种有利于所有欧盟公民的方式实现,而不管他们的地理或经济环境如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in access to gene therapy in the European Union: ethical and regulatory challenges.

Gene therapies represent a significant advancement in modern medicine, offering potential cures for untreatable genetic disorders. However, equitable access to these innovative therapies remains a critical ethical challenge within the European Union (EU). This paper examines the adequacy of the EU's centralized market authorization framework, supplemented by alternative pathways such as the Hospital Exemption and Compassionate Use Program, in addressing access disparities. While the centralized framework ensures high standards of safety, quality, and efficacy, its implementation reveals significant barriers related to affordability, geographical disparities, and fragmented national healthcare systems. High costs create financial obstacles for both healthcare systems and individuals, disproportionately affecting low-income countries and regions. Geographic disparities are further exacerbated by fragmented regulations and uneven healthcare infrastructures across member states, limiting patient access in rural areas. Alternative pathways, while designed to improve access, suffer from inconsistent national-level implementation. This paper argues that as the EU navigates the complexities of gene therapy regulation, it must focus on creating a more cohesive and inclusive framework. By doing so, it can ensure that the potential of gene therapies is realized in a manner that benefits all EU citizens, irrespective of their geographic or economic circumstances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law and the Biosciences (JLB) is the first fully Open Access peer-reviewed legal journal focused on the advances at the intersection of law and the biosciences. A co-venture between Duke University, Harvard University Law School, and Stanford University, and published by Oxford University Press, this open access, online, and interdisciplinary academic journal publishes cutting-edge scholarship in this important new field. The Journal contains original and response articles, essays, and commentaries on a wide range of topics, including bioethics, neuroethics, genetics, reproductive technologies, stem cells, enhancement, patent law, and food and drug regulation. JLB is published as one volume with three issues per year with new articles posted online on an ongoing basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信