{"title":"生物瓣膜大小对主动脉瓣狭窄手术置换术长期预后的影响。","authors":"Rieko Kutsuzawa, Satoshi Kainuma, Naonori Kawamoto, Kota Suzuki, Takashi Kakuta, Ayumi Ikuta, Kohei Tonai, Masaya Hirayama, Hironobu Sakurai, Shinichi Kurashima, Yuki Irie, Takahiro Sakamoto, Kenji Moriuchi, Masashi Amano, Atsushi Okada, Kensuke Takagi, Makoto Amaki, Hideaki Kanzaki, Takeshi Kitai, Chisato Izumi, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Takashi Daimon, Satsuki Fukushima","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We clarified associations between biological valve sizes selected during primary surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and its long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 754 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent primary biological SAVR were classified into three groups based on valve size: 19-mm (n=246), 21-mm (n=262), and ≥23-mm (n=246). Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was defined as measured indexed effective orifice area ≤0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> if body mass index (BMI) is <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and ≤0.55 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> if BMI is ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The mean observation period was 6.6±4.0 years (4996 patient-years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with 19-mm valve were older (19-mm: 74±7.8 years vs. 21-mm: 72±8.0 years vs. ≥23-mm: 69±10 years), predominantly female (91% vs. 55% vs. 13%), and had smaller body surface area (BSA) (1.39±0.12 m<sup>2</sup> vs. 1.53±0.15 m<sup>2</sup> vs. 1.67±0.16 m<sup>2</sup>). The incidence of post-SAVR severe PPM was 15%, 5.8%, and 5.0%, respectively (p< 0.001 for all). However, a mixed-effects model demonstrated that left ventricular (LV) mass index regressed equivalently (interaction effect=0.189). During follow-up, 142 (19%) mortalities and 41 (5.4%) aortic valve reinterventions (31 redo-SAVR and 10 valve-in-valve) were observed, without difference in 10-year all-cause mortality rate (21% vs. 33% vs. 27%, p=0.438). Fine-Gray regression model identified age at surgery (adjusted hazard ratio 0.4 per 10-year, p<0.001) and use of 19-mm valve (adjusted hazard ratio 4.0, p<0.001) as independent associates with aortic valve reinterventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a higher incidence of severe PPM and aortic reintervention after primary SAVR, use of a 19-mm biological valve can be justified for elderly patients with small BSA, as evidenced by equivalent long-term survival and LV mass regression to those with larger valves.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic impacts of biological valve size on long-term outcomes of primary surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Rieko Kutsuzawa, Satoshi Kainuma, Naonori Kawamoto, Kota Suzuki, Takashi Kakuta, Ayumi Ikuta, Kohei Tonai, Masaya Hirayama, Hironobu Sakurai, Shinichi Kurashima, Yuki Irie, Takahiro Sakamoto, Kenji Moriuchi, Masashi Amano, Atsushi Okada, Kensuke Takagi, Makoto Amaki, Hideaki Kanzaki, Takeshi Kitai, Chisato Izumi, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Takashi Daimon, Satsuki Fukushima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We clarified associations between biological valve sizes selected during primary surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and its long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 754 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent primary biological SAVR were classified into three groups based on valve size: 19-mm (n=246), 21-mm (n=262), and ≥23-mm (n=246). Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was defined as measured indexed effective orifice area ≤0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> if body mass index (BMI) is <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and ≤0.55 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> if BMI is ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The mean observation period was 6.6±4.0 years (4996 patient-years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with 19-mm valve were older (19-mm: 74±7.8 years vs. 21-mm: 72±8.0 years vs. ≥23-mm: 69±10 years), predominantly female (91% vs. 55% vs. 13%), and had smaller body surface area (BSA) (1.39±0.12 m<sup>2</sup> vs. 1.53±0.15 m<sup>2</sup> vs. 1.67±0.16 m<sup>2</sup>). The incidence of post-SAVR severe PPM was 15%, 5.8%, and 5.0%, respectively (p< 0.001 for all). However, a mixed-effects model demonstrated that left ventricular (LV) mass index regressed equivalently (interaction effect=0.189). During follow-up, 142 (19%) mortalities and 41 (5.4%) aortic valve reinterventions (31 redo-SAVR and 10 valve-in-valve) were observed, without difference in 10-year all-cause mortality rate (21% vs. 33% vs. 27%, p=0.438). Fine-Gray regression model identified age at surgery (adjusted hazard ratio 0.4 per 10-year, p<0.001) and use of 19-mm valve (adjusted hazard ratio 4.0, p<0.001) as independent associates with aortic valve reinterventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a higher incidence of severe PPM and aortic reintervention after primary SAVR, use of a 19-mm biological valve can be justified for elderly patients with small BSA, as evidenced by equivalent long-term survival and LV mass regression to those with larger valves.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们阐明了原发性主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)中选择的生物瓣膜大小与其长期预后之间的关系。方法:共有754例连续主动脉瓣狭窄患者行原发性生物SAVR,根据瓣膜大小分为3组:19mm (n=246)、21mm (n=262)和≥23mm (n=246)。严重假体-患者失配(PPM)定义为:如果体重指数(BMI)为2,测量的指标性有效孔面积≤0.65 cm2/m2,如果BMI≥30 kg/m2,测量的指标性有效孔面积≤0.55 cm2/m2。平均观察时间6.6±4.0年(4996患者年)。结果:19 mm瓣膜患者年龄较大(19 mm: 74±7.8岁vs. 21 mm: 72±8.0岁vs.≥23 mm: 69±10岁),以女性为主(91% vs. 55% vs. 13%),体表面积(BSA)较小(1.39±0.12 m2 vs. 1.53±0.15 m2 vs. 1.67±0.16 m2)。savr后严重PPM的发生率分别为15%、5.8%和5.0%(均p< 0.001)。然而,混合效应模型显示左室(LV)质量指数等效回归(交互效应=0.189)。在随访期间,观察到142例(19%)死亡和41例(5.4%)主动脉瓣再介入(31例复位savr和10例瓣内介入),10年全因死亡率无差异(21% vs. 33% vs. 27%, p=0.438)。细灰色回归模型确定手术年龄(校正风险比0.4 / 10年)。结论:尽管原发性SAVR后严重PPM和主动脉再介入的发生率较高,但对于BSA较小的老年患者,使用19mm生物瓣膜是合理的,其长期生存率和左室质量回归与瓣膜较大的患者相当。
Prognostic impacts of biological valve size on long-term outcomes of primary surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
Objectives: We clarified associations between biological valve sizes selected during primary surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and its long-term outcomes.
Methods: In total, 754 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent primary biological SAVR were classified into three groups based on valve size: 19-mm (n=246), 21-mm (n=262), and ≥23-mm (n=246). Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was defined as measured indexed effective orifice area ≤0.65 cm2/m2 if body mass index (BMI) is <30 kg/m2 and ≤0.55 cm2/m2 if BMI is ≥30 kg/m2. The mean observation period was 6.6±4.0 years (4996 patient-years).
Results: Patients with 19-mm valve were older (19-mm: 74±7.8 years vs. 21-mm: 72±8.0 years vs. ≥23-mm: 69±10 years), predominantly female (91% vs. 55% vs. 13%), and had smaller body surface area (BSA) (1.39±0.12 m2 vs. 1.53±0.15 m2 vs. 1.67±0.16 m2). The incidence of post-SAVR severe PPM was 15%, 5.8%, and 5.0%, respectively (p< 0.001 for all). However, a mixed-effects model demonstrated that left ventricular (LV) mass index regressed equivalently (interaction effect=0.189). During follow-up, 142 (19%) mortalities and 41 (5.4%) aortic valve reinterventions (31 redo-SAVR and 10 valve-in-valve) were observed, without difference in 10-year all-cause mortality rate (21% vs. 33% vs. 27%, p=0.438). Fine-Gray regression model identified age at surgery (adjusted hazard ratio 0.4 per 10-year, p<0.001) and use of 19-mm valve (adjusted hazard ratio 4.0, p<0.001) as independent associates with aortic valve reinterventions.
Conclusions: Despite a higher incidence of severe PPM and aortic reintervention after primary SAVR, use of a 19-mm biological valve can be justified for elderly patients with small BSA, as evidenced by equivalent long-term survival and LV mass regression to those with larger valves.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.