日本和美国抗癌药物批准滞后的趋势和决定因素:多地区试验和同时批准的作用。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Hitoshi Kanno, Kotone Matsuyama
{"title":"日本和美国抗癌药物批准滞后的趋势和决定因素:多地区试验和同时批准的作用。","authors":"Hitoshi Kanno,&nbsp;Kotone Matsuyama","doi":"10.1111/cts.70336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Timely access to treatment for cancer patients requires the accelerated approval of new anticancer therapies. However, the lengthy pharmaceutical approval process in Japan has contributed to what is known as “drug lag.” Although recent efforts to promote international multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) involving Japan and to advance strategies for concurrent approval in Japan and the United States have helped shorten time to approval, the individual effects of these approaches have not been fully quantified. This study analyzed trends in the timing of drug application, review, and approval for anticancer agents approved in Japan and the United States, and evaluated the influence of MRCT participation, concurrent approval, company origin, cancer type, and regulatory programs through multivariate analysis. We examined 142 anticancer agents approved between October 2004 and March 2025 by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The median approval lag was 774 days (interquartile range: 217–1370), but decreased markedly to about 100 days by the 2020s. Approval lag was significantly shorter for drugs developed through MRCTs and those approved concurrently in both countries (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), whereas company origin, cancer type, and regulatory program use were not significantly associated (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MRCTs and concurrent approval were independently associated with shorter approval lag. These findings support early international development and synchronized submission timing to further reduce approval lag. They provide updated evidence based on recent data and offer novel insights by quantifying the effects of MRCT implementation and concurrent approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70336","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in and Determinants of Approval Lag for Anticancer Drugs in Japan and the US: Role of Multi-Regional Trials and Concurrent Approvals\",\"authors\":\"Hitoshi Kanno,&nbsp;Kotone Matsuyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Timely access to treatment for cancer patients requires the accelerated approval of new anticancer therapies. However, the lengthy pharmaceutical approval process in Japan has contributed to what is known as “drug lag.” Although recent efforts to promote international multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) involving Japan and to advance strategies for concurrent approval in Japan and the United States have helped shorten time to approval, the individual effects of these approaches have not been fully quantified. This study analyzed trends in the timing of drug application, review, and approval for anticancer agents approved in Japan and the United States, and evaluated the influence of MRCT participation, concurrent approval, company origin, cancer type, and regulatory programs through multivariate analysis. We examined 142 anticancer agents approved between October 2004 and March 2025 by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The median approval lag was 774 days (interquartile range: 217–1370), but decreased markedly to about 100 days by the 2020s. Approval lag was significantly shorter for drugs developed through MRCTs and those approved concurrently in both countries (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), whereas company origin, cancer type, and regulatory program use were not significantly associated (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MRCTs and concurrent approval were independently associated with shorter approval lag. These findings support early international development and synchronized submission timing to further reduce approval lag. They provide updated evidence based on recent data and offer novel insights by quantifying the effects of MRCT implementation and concurrent approval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70336\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70336\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症患者及时获得治疗需要加快批准新的抗癌疗法。然而,日本冗长的药品审批程序导致了所谓的“药物滞后”。尽管最近推动包括日本在内的国际多区域临床试验(mrct)的努力,以及推进在日本和美国同时批准的策略,有助于缩短批准时间,但这些方法的个体效应尚未完全量化。本研究分析了在日本和美国批准的抗癌药物的药物申请、审查和批准时间的趋势,并通过多变量分析评估了MRCT参与、同时批准、公司来源、癌症类型和监管项目的影响。我们研究了2004年10月至2025年3月期间日本药品和医疗器械管理局和美国食品和药物管理局批准的142种抗癌药物。批准延迟的中位数为774天(四分位数范围:217-1370),但到本世纪20年代显著减少至约100天。通过mrct开发的药物和在两国同时获得批准的药物的批准滞后时间显著缩短(p均0.05)。多变量分析证实,mrct和并发审批与较短的审批滞后独立相关。这些发现支持早期国际开发和同步提交时间,以进一步减少审批滞后。他们提供了基于最新数据的最新证据,并通过量化MRCT实施和同时批准的效果提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trends in and Determinants of Approval Lag for Anticancer Drugs in Japan and the US: Role of Multi-Regional Trials and Concurrent Approvals

Trends in and Determinants of Approval Lag for Anticancer Drugs in Japan and the US: Role of Multi-Regional Trials and Concurrent Approvals

Timely access to treatment for cancer patients requires the accelerated approval of new anticancer therapies. However, the lengthy pharmaceutical approval process in Japan has contributed to what is known as “drug lag.” Although recent efforts to promote international multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) involving Japan and to advance strategies for concurrent approval in Japan and the United States have helped shorten time to approval, the individual effects of these approaches have not been fully quantified. This study analyzed trends in the timing of drug application, review, and approval for anticancer agents approved in Japan and the United States, and evaluated the influence of MRCT participation, concurrent approval, company origin, cancer type, and regulatory programs through multivariate analysis. We examined 142 anticancer agents approved between October 2004 and March 2025 by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The median approval lag was 774 days (interquartile range: 217–1370), but decreased markedly to about 100 days by the 2020s. Approval lag was significantly shorter for drugs developed through MRCTs and those approved concurrently in both countries (both p < 0.001), whereas company origin, cancer type, and regulatory program use were not significantly associated (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MRCTs and concurrent approval were independently associated with shorter approval lag. These findings support early international development and synchronized submission timing to further reduce approval lag. They provide updated evidence based on recent data and offer novel insights by quantifying the effects of MRCT implementation and concurrent approval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信