两种适应性听觉认知训练范式对竞争性说话者听力的影响。

Q2 Health Professions
Seminars in Hearing Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1811532
Charlie Fisher, Michael A Johns, Lien P Decruy, Regina C Calloway, Jason L Dunlap, Jonathan Z Simon, Samira Anderson, Stefanie E Kuchinsky
{"title":"两种适应性听觉认知训练范式对竞争性说话者听力的影响。","authors":"Charlie Fisher, Michael A Johns, Lien P Decruy, Regina C Calloway, Jason L Dunlap, Jonathan Z Simon, Samira Anderson, Stefanie E Kuchinsky","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1811532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Speech intelligibility among competing talkers becomes more difficult with age, even for older adults with clinically normal hearing. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the implementation of auditory-cognitive training to improve speech-in-noise recognition performance, particularly for older adults. In this study, we implemented two levels of cognitive demand in an adaptive auditory-cognitive training program that used a competing-speaker paradigm. Older adults with normal to near-normal hearing thresholds were assessed on training performance (at the individual and group level), self-reported training strategies, and far-transfer learning in a speech-perception-in-noise task. Training performance analysis revealed that some older adults, particularly those in the more demanding training, performed poorly during the auditory-cognitive training itself. Some participants in this group reported disengagement, potentially due to the low level of those individuals' self-reported satisfaction with engaging in challenging tasks in daily life. Despite these challenges, however, both groups generally improved in the far-transfer learning assessment, though there was variation among participants. Our results suggest that too-high levels of cognitive demand within the auditory-cognitive training may limit some aspects of training outcomes for speech perception in noise; however, higher cognitive demand may be beneficial for those who enjoy challenging tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":53691,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Hearing","volume":"46 2","pages":"141-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impacts of Two Adaptive Auditory-Cognitive Training Paradigms on Listening to Competing Talkers.\",\"authors\":\"Charlie Fisher, Michael A Johns, Lien P Decruy, Regina C Calloway, Jason L Dunlap, Jonathan Z Simon, Samira Anderson, Stefanie E Kuchinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1811532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Speech intelligibility among competing talkers becomes more difficult with age, even for older adults with clinically normal hearing. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the implementation of auditory-cognitive training to improve speech-in-noise recognition performance, particularly for older adults. In this study, we implemented two levels of cognitive demand in an adaptive auditory-cognitive training program that used a competing-speaker paradigm. Older adults with normal to near-normal hearing thresholds were assessed on training performance (at the individual and group level), self-reported training strategies, and far-transfer learning in a speech-perception-in-noise task. Training performance analysis revealed that some older adults, particularly those in the more demanding training, performed poorly during the auditory-cognitive training itself. Some participants in this group reported disengagement, potentially due to the low level of those individuals' self-reported satisfaction with engaging in challenging tasks in daily life. Despite these challenges, however, both groups generally improved in the far-transfer learning assessment, though there was variation among participants. Our results suggest that too-high levels of cognitive demand within the auditory-cognitive training may limit some aspects of training outcomes for speech perception in noise; however, higher cognitive demand may be beneficial for those who enjoy challenging tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Hearing\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"141-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483581/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1811532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1811532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着年龄的增长,说话者之间的言语清晰度变得越来越困难,即使是临床上听力正常的老年人也是如此。最近,人们对听觉认知训练的实施越来越感兴趣,以提高语音在噪音中的识别性能,特别是对老年人。在这项研究中,我们在一个适应性听觉认知训练项目中实施了两个层次的认知需求,该项目使用了竞争说话者范式。听力阈值正常至接近正常的老年人在训练表现(在个人和群体水平上)、自我报告的训练策略和语音感知噪声任务中的远迁移学习方面进行评估。训练表现分析显示,一些老年人,特别是那些在更高要求的训练中,在听觉认知训练本身表现不佳。这一组中的一些参与者报告说,他们脱离了工作,这可能是由于这些人对日常生活中具有挑战性的任务的自我报告满意度较低。然而,尽管存在这些挑战,两组在远程迁移学习评估中总体上都有所改善,尽管参与者之间存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,在听觉-认知训练中,过高的认知需求水平可能会限制噪音语音感知训练结果的某些方面;然而,更高的认知需求可能对那些喜欢挑战性任务的人有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impacts of Two Adaptive Auditory-Cognitive Training Paradigms on Listening to Competing Talkers.

Speech intelligibility among competing talkers becomes more difficult with age, even for older adults with clinically normal hearing. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the implementation of auditory-cognitive training to improve speech-in-noise recognition performance, particularly for older adults. In this study, we implemented two levels of cognitive demand in an adaptive auditory-cognitive training program that used a competing-speaker paradigm. Older adults with normal to near-normal hearing thresholds were assessed on training performance (at the individual and group level), self-reported training strategies, and far-transfer learning in a speech-perception-in-noise task. Training performance analysis revealed that some older adults, particularly those in the more demanding training, performed poorly during the auditory-cognitive training itself. Some participants in this group reported disengagement, potentially due to the low level of those individuals' self-reported satisfaction with engaging in challenging tasks in daily life. Despite these challenges, however, both groups generally improved in the far-transfer learning assessment, though there was variation among participants. Our results suggest that too-high levels of cognitive demand within the auditory-cognitive training may limit some aspects of training outcomes for speech perception in noise; however, higher cognitive demand may be beneficial for those who enjoy challenging tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Hearing
Seminars in Hearing Health Professions-Speech and Hearing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Seminars in Hearing is a quarterly review journal that publishes topic-specific issues in the field of audiology including areas such as hearing loss, auditory disorders and psychoacoustics. The journal presents the latest clinical data, new screening and assessment techniques, along with suggestions for improving patient care in a concise and readable forum. Technological advances with regards to new auditory devices are also featured. The journal"s content is an ideal reference for both the practicing audiologist as well as an excellent educational tool for students who require the latest information on emerging techniques and areas of interest in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信