医疗补助受益人中腰痛的管理:各州的模式、模式和观点。

IF 2.7
Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-09-08 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf180
Kayla N Tormohlen, Christie Lee Luo, Anam Ahsan, Brian C Coleman, Patience M Dow, William C Becker, Tamara Haegerich, Emma E McGinty
{"title":"医疗补助受益人中腰痛的管理:各州的模式、模式和观点。","authors":"Kayla N Tormohlen, Christie Lee Luo, Anam Ahsan, Brian C Coleman, Patience M Dow, William C Becker, Tamara Haegerich, Emma E McGinty","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide and Medicaid beneficiaries are disproportionally impacted. No studies have comprehensively examined patterns of treatment among Medicaid beneficiaries with low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We quantitatively described modalities of treatment and low-value care received following a low back pain diagnosis among Medicaid beneficiaries across the United States. We then qualitatively explored factors that influence treatment patterns by interviewing chronic pain experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, 39.6% of patients received a prescription opioid in the 12 months following diagnosis and 41.2% received conservative therapies-noninvasive, nonpharmacological methods including physical, manual, or psychological therapies. Prescription nonopioid analgesic medications were the most common modality received first (57.8%) and across the 12 months following diagnosis (74.1%). On average, 8.9% of patients received high-dose, long-term opioid therapy (>120 morphine milligram equivalents/d for ≥90 days) and 31.7% received early imaging; both indicators for low-value care. Chronic pain experts highlighted challenges related to Medicaid coverage for conservative therapies, limited access to pain specialists, and social and economic factors influencing treatment access and utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers, including Medicaid coverage limitations, provider access challenges, and economic factors, likely impact patterns of low back pain treatment among individuals enrolled in Medicaid.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 9","pages":"qxaf180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of low back pain among Medicaid beneficiaries: modalities, patterns, and perspectives across states.\",\"authors\":\"Kayla N Tormohlen, Christie Lee Luo, Anam Ahsan, Brian C Coleman, Patience M Dow, William C Becker, Tamara Haegerich, Emma E McGinty\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxaf180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide and Medicaid beneficiaries are disproportionally impacted. No studies have comprehensively examined patterns of treatment among Medicaid beneficiaries with low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We quantitatively described modalities of treatment and low-value care received following a low back pain diagnosis among Medicaid beneficiaries across the United States. We then qualitatively explored factors that influence treatment patterns by interviewing chronic pain experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, 39.6% of patients received a prescription opioid in the 12 months following diagnosis and 41.2% received conservative therapies-noninvasive, nonpharmacological methods including physical, manual, or psychological therapies. Prescription nonopioid analgesic medications were the most common modality received first (57.8%) and across the 12 months following diagnosis (74.1%). On average, 8.9% of patients received high-dose, long-term opioid therapy (>120 morphine milligram equivalents/d for ≥90 days) and 31.7% received early imaging; both indicators for low-value care. Chronic pain experts highlighted challenges related to Medicaid coverage for conservative therapies, limited access to pain specialists, and social and economic factors influencing treatment access and utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers, including Medicaid coverage limitations, provider access challenges, and economic factors, likely impact patterns of low back pain treatment among individuals enrolled in Medicaid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"3 9\",\"pages\":\"qxaf180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482911/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:腰痛是世界范围内致残的主要原因和医疗补助受益人不成比例的影响。目前还没有研究对医疗补助受益人腰痛的治疗模式进行全面调查。方法:我们定量描述了美国医疗补助受益人中腰痛诊断后接受的治疗方式和低价值护理。然后,我们通过采访慢性疼痛专家,定性地探讨了影响治疗模式的因素。结果:平均而言,39.6%的患者在诊断后的12个月内接受了处方阿片类药物治疗,41.2%的患者接受了保守治疗——非侵入性、非药物治疗,包括物理、手工或心理治疗。处方非阿片类镇痛药物是最常见的治疗方式(57.8%)和诊断后12个月(74.1%)。平均而言,8.9%的患者接受了高剂量长期阿片类药物治疗(>120吗啡毫克当量/天,持续≥90天),31.7%的患者接受了早期影像学检查;两者都是低价值护理的指标。慢性疼痛专家强调了与医疗补助覆盖保守治疗相关的挑战,获得疼痛专家的机会有限,以及影响治疗获取和利用的社会和经济因素。结论:障碍,包括医疗补助覆盖范围的限制、提供者获取的挑战和经济因素,可能影响医疗补助个体腰痛治疗的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Management of low back pain among Medicaid beneficiaries: modalities, patterns, and perspectives across states.

Management of low back pain among Medicaid beneficiaries: modalities, patterns, and perspectives across states.

Management of low back pain among Medicaid beneficiaries: modalities, patterns, and perspectives across states.

Introduction: Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide and Medicaid beneficiaries are disproportionally impacted. No studies have comprehensively examined patterns of treatment among Medicaid beneficiaries with low back pain.

Methods: We quantitatively described modalities of treatment and low-value care received following a low back pain diagnosis among Medicaid beneficiaries across the United States. We then qualitatively explored factors that influence treatment patterns by interviewing chronic pain experts.

Results: On average, 39.6% of patients received a prescription opioid in the 12 months following diagnosis and 41.2% received conservative therapies-noninvasive, nonpharmacological methods including physical, manual, or psychological therapies. Prescription nonopioid analgesic medications were the most common modality received first (57.8%) and across the 12 months following diagnosis (74.1%). On average, 8.9% of patients received high-dose, long-term opioid therapy (>120 morphine milligram equivalents/d for ≥90 days) and 31.7% received early imaging; both indicators for low-value care. Chronic pain experts highlighted challenges related to Medicaid coverage for conservative therapies, limited access to pain specialists, and social and economic factors influencing treatment access and utilization.

Conclusion: Barriers, including Medicaid coverage limitations, provider access challenges, and economic factors, likely impact patterns of low back pain treatment among individuals enrolled in Medicaid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信