相对掌骨缩短作为第四和第五掌骨骨折脱位的x线测量。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Lilah Fones, Daniel Nemirov, Meysam Fathi Choghadeh, Pedro K Beredjiklian
{"title":"相对掌骨缩短作为第四和第五掌骨骨折脱位的x线测量。","authors":"Lilah Fones, Daniel Nemirov, Meysam Fathi Choghadeh, Pedro K Beredjiklian","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations may be missed on plain x-ray. The purpose of this study was to describe a radiographic measurement, the relative metacarpal shortening (RMS), to evaluate for fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations on posteroanterior radiographs. We hypothesize that the RMS will increase in patients with fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations relative to controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review identified posteroanterior hand radiographs of skeletally mature patients with fourth and/or fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations. Comparisons were made of normal radiographs identified from patients presenting to the outpatient orthopedic hand clinic for complaints other than fracture or dislocation. Three independent reviewers performed measurements, with two of these reviewers measuring the RMS for each patient radiograph. The fourth and fifth RMS were calculated by dividing the length from the fourth/fifth distal metacarpal head to a tangential line to the third metacarpal head by the third metacarpal length. Measures were compared between the two cohorts. Agreement was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients between reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 42 controls and 41 fractures were included. The fracture group included 18 patients (43.9%) with isolated fifth metacarpal involvement and 23 patients (56.1%) with both fourth and fifth metacarpal involvement. Fractures were more commonly right-sided, younger, and men relative to controls. The fourth and fifth RMS were higher for fractures (0.16 and 0.31) than for controls (0.12 and 0.26), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient agreement test was almost perfect for all measurements (range: 0.82-0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RMS is a radiographic measurement with almost perfect agreement between reviewers and is increased in fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations. Fourth RMS >0.13 and fifth RMS >0.28 should increase the index of suspicion for carpometacarpal fracture dislocation in a patient with corresponding ulnar hand pain.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative Metacarpal Shortening as a Radiographic Measure of Fourth and Fifth Carpometacarpal Fracture Dislocation.\",\"authors\":\"Lilah Fones, Daniel Nemirov, Meysam Fathi Choghadeh, Pedro K Beredjiklian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.08.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations may be missed on plain x-ray. The purpose of this study was to describe a radiographic measurement, the relative metacarpal shortening (RMS), to evaluate for fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations on posteroanterior radiographs. We hypothesize that the RMS will increase in patients with fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations relative to controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review identified posteroanterior hand radiographs of skeletally mature patients with fourth and/or fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations. Comparisons were made of normal radiographs identified from patients presenting to the outpatient orthopedic hand clinic for complaints other than fracture or dislocation. Three independent reviewers performed measurements, with two of these reviewers measuring the RMS for each patient radiograph. The fourth and fifth RMS were calculated by dividing the length from the fourth/fifth distal metacarpal head to a tangential line to the third metacarpal head by the third metacarpal length. Measures were compared between the two cohorts. Agreement was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients between reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 42 controls and 41 fractures were included. The fracture group included 18 patients (43.9%) with isolated fifth metacarpal involvement and 23 patients (56.1%) with both fourth and fifth metacarpal involvement. Fractures were more commonly right-sided, younger, and men relative to controls. The fourth and fifth RMS were higher for fractures (0.16 and 0.31) than for controls (0.12 and 0.26), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient agreement test was almost perfect for all measurements (range: 0.82-0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RMS is a radiographic measurement with almost perfect agreement between reviewers and is increased in fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations. Fourth RMS >0.13 and fifth RMS >0.28 should increase the index of suspicion for carpometacarpal fracture dislocation in a patient with corresponding ulnar hand pain.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.08.011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.08.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:第四和第五掌骨骨折脱位可能在x线平片上被遗漏。本研究的目的是描述一种x线测量方法,相对掌骨缩短(RMS),以评估后前方x线片上第四和第五掌骨骨折脱位。我们假设相对于对照组,第四和第五腕掌骨骨折脱位患者的RMS会增加。方法:回顾性回顾确定了第四和/或第五掌骨骨折脱位的骨骼成熟患者的手后前位x线片。比较了正常的x线片从患者提出的门诊矫形手诊所的投诉,除骨折或脱位。三位独立的审稿人进行了测量,其中两位审稿人测量了每位患者x线片的RMS。通过将第四/第五远端掌骨头与第三掌骨头相切线的长度除以第三掌骨长度来计算第四和第五RMS。比较两个队列的测量值。通过评价者之间的类内相关系数来评估一致性。结果:对照组42例,骨折41例。骨折组包括18例(43.9%)孤立的第五掌骨受累,23例(56.1%)同时受累第四和第五掌骨。与对照组相比,骨折更常见于右侧、年轻和男性。骨折组的第4和第5 RMS(0.16和0.31)分别高于对照组(0.12和0.26)。类内相关系数一致性检验对所有测量值几乎是完美的(范围:0.82-0.94)。结论:RMS是一种影像学测量方法,与评论者几乎完全一致,在第四和第五掌骨骨折脱位时RMS增加。第四RMS >0.13和第五RMS >0.28应增加怀疑腕掌骨折脱位患者相应尺手疼痛的指数。研究类型/证据水平:诊断IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative Metacarpal Shortening as a Radiographic Measure of Fourth and Fifth Carpometacarpal Fracture Dislocation.

Purpose: Fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations may be missed on plain x-ray. The purpose of this study was to describe a radiographic measurement, the relative metacarpal shortening (RMS), to evaluate for fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations on posteroanterior radiographs. We hypothesize that the RMS will increase in patients with fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations relative to controls.

Methods: A retrospective review identified posteroanterior hand radiographs of skeletally mature patients with fourth and/or fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations. Comparisons were made of normal radiographs identified from patients presenting to the outpatient orthopedic hand clinic for complaints other than fracture or dislocation. Three independent reviewers performed measurements, with two of these reviewers measuring the RMS for each patient radiograph. The fourth and fifth RMS were calculated by dividing the length from the fourth/fifth distal metacarpal head to a tangential line to the third metacarpal head by the third metacarpal length. Measures were compared between the two cohorts. Agreement was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients between reviewers.

Results: In total, 42 controls and 41 fractures were included. The fracture group included 18 patients (43.9%) with isolated fifth metacarpal involvement and 23 patients (56.1%) with both fourth and fifth metacarpal involvement. Fractures were more commonly right-sided, younger, and men relative to controls. The fourth and fifth RMS were higher for fractures (0.16 and 0.31) than for controls (0.12 and 0.26), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient agreement test was almost perfect for all measurements (range: 0.82-0.94).

Conclusions: The RMS is a radiographic measurement with almost perfect agreement between reviewers and is increased in fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations. Fourth RMS >0.13 and fifth RMS >0.28 should increase the index of suspicion for carpometacarpal fracture dislocation in a patient with corresponding ulnar hand pain.

Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信