非裔美国成人2型糖尿病技术强化糖尿病教育研究(TIDES):一项随机对照试验

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Leonard E Egede, Joni S Williams, Rebecca G Knapp, Rebekah J Walker
{"title":"非裔美国成人2型糖尿病技术强化糖尿病教育研究(TIDES):一项随机对照试验","authors":"Leonard E Egede, Joni S Williams, Rebecca G Knapp, Rebekah J Walker","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09883-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the efficacy of a technology-intensified diabetes education and skills training (TIDES) intervention on improving glycemic control among African American (AA) adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 200 AAs ≥ 21 years of age with T2DM (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 8%) from the southeastern U.S. were randomized to TIDES or usual care. Participants in TIDES received a home telemonitoring device for daily uploads of blood glucose readings and 12 weeks of telephone-delivered diabetes education and skills training. The primary outcome was HbA1c at 12-months in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Participants were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Baseline adjusted random intercept models evaluated the reduction in HbA1c for TIDES compared to usual care. Per protocol samples and baseline adjusted marginal models were used as sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 66.5% of the sample was women; 88.5% were < 70 years of age; and 85.3% had an annual household income < $50,000. The study maintained a 90% retention rate at 12-months. HbA1c at 3 months was marginally statistically significantly lower compared to usual care (p = 0.06); however, at 12-months, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.668). Per protocol samples and marginal models showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results found a more immediate drop in HbA1c during the intervention period compared to usual care, but no significant difference at 12-months. Possible co-interventions occurring in the primary care clinic at the time of the study and low intensity booster sessions may explain results and have implications for future diabetes multicomponent trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology-Intensified Diabetes Education Study (TIDES) for African American Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Leonard E Egede, Joni S Williams, Rebecca G Knapp, Rebekah J Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09883-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the efficacy of a technology-intensified diabetes education and skills training (TIDES) intervention on improving glycemic control among African American (AA) adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 200 AAs ≥ 21 years of age with T2DM (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 8%) from the southeastern U.S. were randomized to TIDES or usual care. Participants in TIDES received a home telemonitoring device for daily uploads of blood glucose readings and 12 weeks of telephone-delivered diabetes education and skills training. The primary outcome was HbA1c at 12-months in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Participants were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Baseline adjusted random intercept models evaluated the reduction in HbA1c for TIDES compared to usual care. Per protocol samples and baseline adjusted marginal models were used as sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 66.5% of the sample was women; 88.5% were < 70 years of age; and 85.3% had an annual household income < $50,000. The study maintained a 90% retention rate at 12-months. HbA1c at 3 months was marginally statistically significantly lower compared to usual care (p = 0.06); however, at 12-months, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.668). Per protocol samples and marginal models showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results found a more immediate drop in HbA1c during the intervention period compared to usual care, but no significant difference at 12-months. Possible co-interventions occurring in the primary care clinic at the time of the study and low intensity booster sessions may explain results and have implications for future diabetes multicomponent trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09883-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09883-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估技术强化糖尿病教育和技能培训(TIDES)干预对改善非裔美国人(AA) 2型糖尿病(T2DM)控制不良的成年人血糖控制的效果。方法:来自美国东南部的200名≥21岁的T2DM患者(血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)≥8%)的数据被随机分配到TIDES或常规护理组。TIDES的参与者收到了一个家庭远程监控设备,用于每天上传血糖读数,并接受了12周的电话糖尿病教育和技能培训。主要终点是意向治疗(ITT)人群12个月时的HbA1c。在基线、3、6、9和12个月对参与者进行评估。基线调整随机截距模型评估了与常规治疗相比,TIDES治疗的HbA1c降低。每个方案样本和基线调整的边际模型被用作敏感性分析。结果:大约66.5%的样本是女性;结论:结果发现干预期间与常规护理相比,HbA1c下降更直接,但在12个月时无显著差异。在研究进行时,初级保健诊所中可能出现的联合干预措施和低强度的强化治疗可能解释了结果,并对未来的糖尿病多组分试验具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology-Intensified Diabetes Education Study (TIDES) for African American Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: Assess the efficacy of a technology-intensified diabetes education and skills training (TIDES) intervention on improving glycemic control among African American (AA) adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods: Data from 200 AAs ≥ 21 years of age with T2DM (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 8%) from the southeastern U.S. were randomized to TIDES or usual care. Participants in TIDES received a home telemonitoring device for daily uploads of blood glucose readings and 12 weeks of telephone-delivered diabetes education and skills training. The primary outcome was HbA1c at 12-months in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Participants were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Baseline adjusted random intercept models evaluated the reduction in HbA1c for TIDES compared to usual care. Per protocol samples and baseline adjusted marginal models were used as sensitivity analyses.

Results: Approximately 66.5% of the sample was women; 88.5% were < 70 years of age; and 85.3% had an annual household income < $50,000. The study maintained a 90% retention rate at 12-months. HbA1c at 3 months was marginally statistically significantly lower compared to usual care (p = 0.06); however, at 12-months, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.668). Per protocol samples and marginal models showed similar results.

Conclusions: Results found a more immediate drop in HbA1c during the intervention period compared to usual care, but no significant difference at 12-months. Possible co-interventions occurring in the primary care clinic at the time of the study and low intensity booster sessions may explain results and have implications for future diabetes multicomponent trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信