卡巴他赛与阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗多西他赛后预后不良的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌:一项循环肿瘤DNA分析的2期试验

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Karan Parekh, Kim van der Zande, Sarah W S Ng, Cameron Herberts, Edmond M Kwan, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Vincent van der Noort, Milou P H Busard, Aart Beeker, Pieter van den Berg, Jeantine M de Feijter, Vincent Dezentje, Paul Hamberg, Danny Houtsma, Suzan Ras, Metin Tascilar, Rebecca D Tutuhatunewa-Louhanepessy, Yi Jou Ruby Liao, Sofie H Tolmeijer, Gráinne Donnellan, Kim N Chi, Alexander W Wyatt, Wilbert Zwart, Andries M Bergman
{"title":"卡巴他赛与阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗多西他赛后预后不良的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌:一项循环肿瘤DNA分析的2期试验","authors":"Karan Parekh, Kim van der Zande, Sarah W S Ng, Cameron Herberts, Edmond M Kwan, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Vincent van der Noort, Milou P H Busard, Aart Beeker, Pieter van den Berg, Jeantine M de Feijter, Vincent Dezentje, Paul Hamberg, Danny Houtsma, Suzan Ras, Metin Tascilar, Rebecca D Tutuhatunewa-Louhanepessy, Yi Jou Ruby Liao, Sofie H Tolmeijer, Gráinne Donnellan, Kim N Chi, Alexander W Wyatt, Wilbert Zwart, Andries M Bergman","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Whether cabazitaxel or an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) is the optimal treatment option for poor-prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), progressing on docetaxel, remains unclear. There are limited prospective data supporting a preference for one of these treatments and few candidate biomarkers to inform individual patient management. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of cabazitaxel versus ARPIs in patients with poor-prognosis mCRPC who have progressed on docetaxel, and to evaluate the prognostic and predictive utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in this treatment-refractory population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, open-label, phase 2b trial randomized poor-prognosis mCRPC patients to an ARPI (1000 mg abiraterone plus prednisone or 160 mg enzalutamide daily) or cabazitaxel (25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> every 3 wk plus prednisone daily). The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 wk. The secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA50 response. Genomic analyses on plasma utilized targeted cell-free DNA sequencing at baseline, 12 wk, and progression.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>In total, 106 patients were randomized. The CBR at 12 wk was 62.3% (66/106), with no difference between treatments (p = 0.54). Between groups, rPFS and OS (median follow-up of 30.9 mo) were not different. PSA50 was higher in the ARPI arm (47.2%) than in the cabazitaxel arm (26.9%; p = 0.04). Prior ARPI exposure (in 37.7%) predicted inferior outcomes on ARPIs but not on cabazitaxel. Adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent with cabazitaxel (65.4% vs 30.2%). A high baseline ctDNA fraction correlated with reduced rPFS and OS; plasma AR copy number status was not associated with outcomes, but PTEN alterations were linked with shorter OS (hazard ratio: 1.9, multivariable p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>No significant differences in CBR or time-to-event endpoints were observed between cabazitaxel and ARPIs. However, prior ARPI exposure, a higher baseline ctDNA fraction, and PTEN alterations were strongly prognostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Poor-prognosis Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer After Docetaxel: A Phase 2 Trial with a Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Karan Parekh, Kim van der Zande, Sarah W S Ng, Cameron Herberts, Edmond M Kwan, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Vincent van der Noort, Milou P H Busard, Aart Beeker, Pieter van den Berg, Jeantine M de Feijter, Vincent Dezentje, Paul Hamberg, Danny Houtsma, Suzan Ras, Metin Tascilar, Rebecca D Tutuhatunewa-Louhanepessy, Yi Jou Ruby Liao, Sofie H Tolmeijer, Gráinne Donnellan, Kim N Chi, Alexander W Wyatt, Wilbert Zwart, Andries M Bergman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Whether cabazitaxel or an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) is the optimal treatment option for poor-prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), progressing on docetaxel, remains unclear. There are limited prospective data supporting a preference for one of these treatments and few candidate biomarkers to inform individual patient management. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of cabazitaxel versus ARPIs in patients with poor-prognosis mCRPC who have progressed on docetaxel, and to evaluate the prognostic and predictive utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in this treatment-refractory population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, open-label, phase 2b trial randomized poor-prognosis mCRPC patients to an ARPI (1000 mg abiraterone plus prednisone or 160 mg enzalutamide daily) or cabazitaxel (25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> every 3 wk plus prednisone daily). The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 wk. The secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA50 response. Genomic analyses on plasma utilized targeted cell-free DNA sequencing at baseline, 12 wk, and progression.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>In total, 106 patients were randomized. The CBR at 12 wk was 62.3% (66/106), with no difference between treatments (p = 0.54). Between groups, rPFS and OS (median follow-up of 30.9 mo) were not different. PSA50 was higher in the ARPI arm (47.2%) than in the cabazitaxel arm (26.9%; p = 0.04). Prior ARPI exposure (in 37.7%) predicted inferior outcomes on ARPIs but not on cabazitaxel. Adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent with cabazitaxel (65.4% vs 30.2%). A high baseline ctDNA fraction correlated with reduced rPFS and OS; plasma AR copy number status was not associated with outcomes, but PTEN alterations were linked with shorter OS (hazard ratio: 1.9, multivariable p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>No significant differences in CBR or time-to-event endpoints were observed between cabazitaxel and ARPIs. However, prior ARPI exposure, a higher baseline ctDNA fraction, and PTEN alterations were strongly prognostic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.006\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:卡巴他赛还是雄激素受体途径抑制剂(ARPI)是治疗预后不良的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的最佳选择,多西他赛的进展尚不清楚。有限的前瞻性数据支持对其中一种治疗的偏好,并且很少有候选生物标志物可以告知个体患者管理。本研究旨在比较卡巴他赛与arpi在多西他赛进展的不良预后mCRPC患者中的临床疗效,并评估循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)在这一治疗难治性人群中的预后和预测效用。方法:一项多中心、开放标签、2b期试验将预后不良的mCRPC患者随机分配到ARPI(每日1000mg阿比特龙加强的松或160mg恩杂鲁胺)或卡巴他赛(25mg /m2每3周加强的松)。主要终点是12周时的临床获益率(CBR)。次要终点包括放射学无进展生存期(rPFS)、总生存期(OS)和PSA50反应。血浆基因组分析在基线、12周和进展时使用靶向无细胞DNA测序。主要发现和局限性:共有106例患者被随机分组。12周时CBR为62.3%(66/106),两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.54)。两组间rPFS和OS(中位随访30.9个月)无差异。ARPI组PSA50(47.2%)高于卡巴他赛组(26.9%,p = 0.04)。先前ARPI暴露(37.7%)预测ARPI的不良结果,但卡巴他赛没有。卡巴他赛≥3级不良事件发生率更高(65.4% vs 30.2%)。基线ctDNA分数高与rPFS和OS降低相关;血浆AR拷贝数状态与预后无关,但PTEN改变与较短的OS相关(风险比:1.9,多变量p = 0.02)。结论和临床意义:卡巴他赛和arpi在CBR或事件发生时间终点方面没有显著差异。然而,先前的ARPI暴露,较高的基线ctDNA分数和PTEN改变是强烈的预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Poor-prognosis Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer After Docetaxel: A Phase 2 Trial with a Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis.

Background and objective: Whether cabazitaxel or an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) is the optimal treatment option for poor-prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), progressing on docetaxel, remains unclear. There are limited prospective data supporting a preference for one of these treatments and few candidate biomarkers to inform individual patient management. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of cabazitaxel versus ARPIs in patients with poor-prognosis mCRPC who have progressed on docetaxel, and to evaluate the prognostic and predictive utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in this treatment-refractory population.

Methods: A multicenter, open-label, phase 2b trial randomized poor-prognosis mCRPC patients to an ARPI (1000 mg abiraterone plus prednisone or 160 mg enzalutamide daily) or cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2 every 3 wk plus prednisone daily). The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 wk. The secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA50 response. Genomic analyses on plasma utilized targeted cell-free DNA sequencing at baseline, 12 wk, and progression.

Key findings and limitations: In total, 106 patients were randomized. The CBR at 12 wk was 62.3% (66/106), with no difference between treatments (p = 0.54). Between groups, rPFS and OS (median follow-up of 30.9 mo) were not different. PSA50 was higher in the ARPI arm (47.2%) than in the cabazitaxel arm (26.9%; p = 0.04). Prior ARPI exposure (in 37.7%) predicted inferior outcomes on ARPIs but not on cabazitaxel. Adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent with cabazitaxel (65.4% vs 30.2%). A high baseline ctDNA fraction correlated with reduced rPFS and OS; plasma AR copy number status was not associated with outcomes, but PTEN alterations were linked with shorter OS (hazard ratio: 1.9, multivariable p = 0.02).

Conclusions and clinical implications: No significant differences in CBR or time-to-event endpoints were observed between cabazitaxel and ARPIs. However, prior ARPI exposure, a higher baseline ctDNA fraction, and PTEN alterations were strongly prognostic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信