Karan Parekh, Kim van der Zande, Sarah W S Ng, Cameron Herberts, Edmond M Kwan, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Vincent van der Noort, Milou P H Busard, Aart Beeker, Pieter van den Berg, Jeantine M de Feijter, Vincent Dezentje, Paul Hamberg, Danny Houtsma, Suzan Ras, Metin Tascilar, Rebecca D Tutuhatunewa-Louhanepessy, Yi Jou Ruby Liao, Sofie H Tolmeijer, Gráinne Donnellan, Kim N Chi, Alexander W Wyatt, Wilbert Zwart, Andries M Bergman
{"title":"卡巴他赛与阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗多西他赛后预后不良的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌:一项循环肿瘤DNA分析的2期试验","authors":"Karan Parekh, Kim van der Zande, Sarah W S Ng, Cameron Herberts, Edmond M Kwan, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Vincent van der Noort, Milou P H Busard, Aart Beeker, Pieter van den Berg, Jeantine M de Feijter, Vincent Dezentje, Paul Hamberg, Danny Houtsma, Suzan Ras, Metin Tascilar, Rebecca D Tutuhatunewa-Louhanepessy, Yi Jou Ruby Liao, Sofie H Tolmeijer, Gráinne Donnellan, Kim N Chi, Alexander W Wyatt, Wilbert Zwart, Andries M Bergman","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Whether cabazitaxel or an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) is the optimal treatment option for poor-prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), progressing on docetaxel, remains unclear. There are limited prospective data supporting a preference for one of these treatments and few candidate biomarkers to inform individual patient management. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of cabazitaxel versus ARPIs in patients with poor-prognosis mCRPC who have progressed on docetaxel, and to evaluate the prognostic and predictive utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in this treatment-refractory population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, open-label, phase 2b trial randomized poor-prognosis mCRPC patients to an ARPI (1000 mg abiraterone plus prednisone or 160 mg enzalutamide daily) or cabazitaxel (25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> every 3 wk plus prednisone daily). The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 wk. The secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA50 response. Genomic analyses on plasma utilized targeted cell-free DNA sequencing at baseline, 12 wk, and progression.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>In total, 106 patients were randomized. The CBR at 12 wk was 62.3% (66/106), with no difference between treatments (p = 0.54). Between groups, rPFS and OS (median follow-up of 30.9 mo) were not different. PSA50 was higher in the ARPI arm (47.2%) than in the cabazitaxel arm (26.9%; p = 0.04). Prior ARPI exposure (in 37.7%) predicted inferior outcomes on ARPIs but not on cabazitaxel. Adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent with cabazitaxel (65.4% vs 30.2%). A high baseline ctDNA fraction correlated with reduced rPFS and OS; plasma AR copy number status was not associated with outcomes, but PTEN alterations were linked with shorter OS (hazard ratio: 1.9, multivariable p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>No significant differences in CBR or time-to-event endpoints were observed between cabazitaxel and ARPIs. However, prior ARPI exposure, a higher baseline ctDNA fraction, and PTEN alterations were strongly prognostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Poor-prognosis Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer After Docetaxel: A Phase 2 Trial with a Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Karan Parekh, Kim van der Zande, Sarah W S Ng, Cameron Herberts, Edmond M Kwan, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Vincent van der Noort, Milou P H Busard, Aart Beeker, Pieter van den Berg, Jeantine M de Feijter, Vincent Dezentje, Paul Hamberg, Danny Houtsma, Suzan Ras, Metin Tascilar, Rebecca D Tutuhatunewa-Louhanepessy, Yi Jou Ruby Liao, Sofie H Tolmeijer, Gráinne Donnellan, Kim N Chi, Alexander W Wyatt, Wilbert Zwart, Andries M Bergman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Whether cabazitaxel or an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) is the optimal treatment option for poor-prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), progressing on docetaxel, remains unclear. There are limited prospective data supporting a preference for one of these treatments and few candidate biomarkers to inform individual patient management. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of cabazitaxel versus ARPIs in patients with poor-prognosis mCRPC who have progressed on docetaxel, and to evaluate the prognostic and predictive utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in this treatment-refractory population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, open-label, phase 2b trial randomized poor-prognosis mCRPC patients to an ARPI (1000 mg abiraterone plus prednisone or 160 mg enzalutamide daily) or cabazitaxel (25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> every 3 wk plus prednisone daily). The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 wk. The secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA50 response. Genomic analyses on plasma utilized targeted cell-free DNA sequencing at baseline, 12 wk, and progression.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>In total, 106 patients were randomized. The CBR at 12 wk was 62.3% (66/106), with no difference between treatments (p = 0.54). Between groups, rPFS and OS (median follow-up of 30.9 mo) were not different. PSA50 was higher in the ARPI arm (47.2%) than in the cabazitaxel arm (26.9%; p = 0.04). Prior ARPI exposure (in 37.7%) predicted inferior outcomes on ARPIs but not on cabazitaxel. Adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent with cabazitaxel (65.4% vs 30.2%). A high baseline ctDNA fraction correlated with reduced rPFS and OS; plasma AR copy number status was not associated with outcomes, but PTEN alterations were linked with shorter OS (hazard ratio: 1.9, multivariable p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>No significant differences in CBR or time-to-event endpoints were observed between cabazitaxel and ARPIs. However, prior ARPI exposure, a higher baseline ctDNA fraction, and PTEN alterations were strongly prognostic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.006\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Poor-prognosis Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer After Docetaxel: A Phase 2 Trial with a Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis.
Background and objective: Whether cabazitaxel or an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) is the optimal treatment option for poor-prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), progressing on docetaxel, remains unclear. There are limited prospective data supporting a preference for one of these treatments and few candidate biomarkers to inform individual patient management. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of cabazitaxel versus ARPIs in patients with poor-prognosis mCRPC who have progressed on docetaxel, and to evaluate the prognostic and predictive utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in this treatment-refractory population.
Methods: A multicenter, open-label, phase 2b trial randomized poor-prognosis mCRPC patients to an ARPI (1000 mg abiraterone plus prednisone or 160 mg enzalutamide daily) or cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2 every 3 wk plus prednisone daily). The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 wk. The secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA50 response. Genomic analyses on plasma utilized targeted cell-free DNA sequencing at baseline, 12 wk, and progression.
Key findings and limitations: In total, 106 patients were randomized. The CBR at 12 wk was 62.3% (66/106), with no difference between treatments (p = 0.54). Between groups, rPFS and OS (median follow-up of 30.9 mo) were not different. PSA50 was higher in the ARPI arm (47.2%) than in the cabazitaxel arm (26.9%; p = 0.04). Prior ARPI exposure (in 37.7%) predicted inferior outcomes on ARPIs but not on cabazitaxel. Adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent with cabazitaxel (65.4% vs 30.2%). A high baseline ctDNA fraction correlated with reduced rPFS and OS; plasma AR copy number status was not associated with outcomes, but PTEN alterations were linked with shorter OS (hazard ratio: 1.9, multivariable p = 0.02).
Conclusions and clinical implications: No significant differences in CBR or time-to-event endpoints were observed between cabazitaxel and ARPIs. However, prior ARPI exposure, a higher baseline ctDNA fraction, and PTEN alterations were strongly prognostic.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format