D. Kawahara , H. Masuda , T. Wada , M. Kishi , T. Katsuta , N. Imano , Y. Murakami
{"title":"利用虚拟四维体积调制弧线治疗系统优化肺癌立体定向放射治疗中呼吸运动的边缘适应。","authors":"D. Kawahara , H. Masuda , T. Wada , M. Kishi , T. Katsuta , N. Imano , Y. Murakami","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2025.103934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study applies a previously developed four-dimensional (4D) dose calculation method using virtual four-dimensional computed tomography (v4DCT) to evaluate and optimise the use of an optimal margin (OM) in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Specifically, we assess the clinical feasibility of an OM derived from different prescription isodose levels and its impact on target coverage and normal tissue sparing.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created using a whole-body phantom with a virtual lung tumour. Treatment planning ensured that 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) was covered by the prescription isodose lines for 70%, 75%, and 80%. v4DCT images were generated assuming free breathing. The four-dimensional radiotherapy (v4DRT) dose represented the accumulated dose across all respiratory phases. The dosimetric internal margin (DIM) was defined as the maximum amplitude ensuring D<sub>100%</sub> and D<sub>99%</sub> coverage of the gross tumour volume (GTV). The OM was determined based on the average dose to the GTV and the dose to organs at risk (OARs) for the 70% to 80% isodose plans.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DIM was determined to be 2.0 to 2.6 times larger than the conventional margin accounting for respiratory motion. Implementation of the optimised margin resulted in a significant reduction of the V<sub>20Gy</sub> for normal lung tissue under respiratory motion conditions. Additionally, the maximum dose at distances of 0.5 to 2.0 cm from the PTV showed a reduction with larger amplitudes. The OM with 70% and 75% isodose plan achieved a 55% to 62% reduction compared to the conventional PTV margin with 80% isodose plan.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study proposes an OM for lung SBRT with marginal prescription. This approach reduced the respiratory motion margin by 55% to 62% while maintaining target dose coverage and lowering OAR exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 103934"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimisation of Margin Adaptation for Respiratory Motion in Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Virtual Four-dimensional Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy System Radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"D. Kawahara , H. Masuda , T. Wada , M. Kishi , T. Katsuta , N. Imano , Y. Murakami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clon.2025.103934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study applies a previously developed four-dimensional (4D) dose calculation method using virtual four-dimensional computed tomography (v4DCT) to evaluate and optimise the use of an optimal margin (OM) in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Specifically, we assess the clinical feasibility of an OM derived from different prescription isodose levels and its impact on target coverage and normal tissue sparing.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created using a whole-body phantom with a virtual lung tumour. Treatment planning ensured that 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) was covered by the prescription isodose lines for 70%, 75%, and 80%. v4DCT images were generated assuming free breathing. The four-dimensional radiotherapy (v4DRT) dose represented the accumulated dose across all respiratory phases. The dosimetric internal margin (DIM) was defined as the maximum amplitude ensuring D<sub>100%</sub> and D<sub>99%</sub> coverage of the gross tumour volume (GTV). The OM was determined based on the average dose to the GTV and the dose to organs at risk (OARs) for the 70% to 80% isodose plans.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DIM was determined to be 2.0 to 2.6 times larger than the conventional margin accounting for respiratory motion. Implementation of the optimised margin resulted in a significant reduction of the V<sub>20Gy</sub> for normal lung tissue under respiratory motion conditions. Additionally, the maximum dose at distances of 0.5 to 2.0 cm from the PTV showed a reduction with larger amplitudes. The OM with 70% and 75% isodose plan achieved a 55% to 62% reduction compared to the conventional PTV margin with 80% isodose plan.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study proposes an OM for lung SBRT with marginal prescription. This approach reduced the respiratory motion margin by 55% to 62% while maintaining target dose coverage and lowering OAR exposure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S093665552500189X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S093665552500189X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimisation of Margin Adaptation for Respiratory Motion in Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Virtual Four-dimensional Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy System Radiotherapy
Aim
This study applies a previously developed four-dimensional (4D) dose calculation method using virtual four-dimensional computed tomography (v4DCT) to evaluate and optimise the use of an optimal margin (OM) in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Specifically, we assess the clinical feasibility of an OM derived from different prescription isodose levels and its impact on target coverage and normal tissue sparing.
Materials and Methods
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created using a whole-body phantom with a virtual lung tumour. Treatment planning ensured that 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) was covered by the prescription isodose lines for 70%, 75%, and 80%. v4DCT images were generated assuming free breathing. The four-dimensional radiotherapy (v4DRT) dose represented the accumulated dose across all respiratory phases. The dosimetric internal margin (DIM) was defined as the maximum amplitude ensuring D100% and D99% coverage of the gross tumour volume (GTV). The OM was determined based on the average dose to the GTV and the dose to organs at risk (OARs) for the 70% to 80% isodose plans.
Results
The DIM was determined to be 2.0 to 2.6 times larger than the conventional margin accounting for respiratory motion. Implementation of the optimised margin resulted in a significant reduction of the V20Gy for normal lung tissue under respiratory motion conditions. Additionally, the maximum dose at distances of 0.5 to 2.0 cm from the PTV showed a reduction with larger amplitudes. The OM with 70% and 75% isodose plan achieved a 55% to 62% reduction compared to the conventional PTV margin with 80% isodose plan.
Conclusion
This study proposes an OM for lung SBRT with marginal prescription. This approach reduced the respiratory motion margin by 55% to 62% while maintaining target dose coverage and lowering OAR exposure.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.