Umut Çakır, Noujoud Gabed, Yunus Emre Köroğlu, Selen Kaya, Senjuti Sinharoy, Vagner A Benedito, Marie Brunet, Xavier Roucou, Igor S Kryvoruchko
{"title":"在真核蛋白质组中发现多种嵌合肽,为嵌合翻译假说的实验验证奠定了基础。","authors":"Umut Çakır, Noujoud Gabed, Yunus Emre Köroğlu, Selen Kaya, Senjuti Sinharoy, Vagner A Benedito, Marie Brunet, Xavier Roucou, Igor S Kryvoruchko","doi":"10.1016/j.csbj.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high complexity of eukaryotic organisms enabled their evolutionary success, driven by the diversification of their proteomes. Various mechanisms contributed to this process. Alternative splicing had the largest known impact among these mechanisms. Earlier, we hypothesized that along with alternative splicing, a different but conceptually similar mechanism creates novel versions of existing proteins in all eukaryotes. However, this mechanism operates at the level of translation, where amino acid sequence novelty arises through multiple programmed ribosomal frameshifting events occurring within the same transcript. This mechanism, which is termed mosaic translation, is very difficult to demonstrate even with the most up-to-date molecular tools. Thus, it remained unnoticed so far. Using a subset of mass spectrometry proteomic data from various organs of the model plant <i>Medicago truncatula</i>, we took the first step toward experimental validation of this hypothesis. Our original <i>in silico</i> approach resulted in the discovery of two candidates for mosaic proteins (homologs of EF1α and RuBisCo) and 154 candidates for chimeric peptides. Chimeric peptides and polypeptides are produced in the course of one ribosomal frameshifting event and may correspond to parts of mosaic proteins. In addition, our analysis reveals the possibility of translation of chimeric peptides from five ribosomal RNA transcripts, ten long non-coding RNA transcripts, and one transfer RNA transcript. These findings are novel and will form the basis for future experimental validation. We also present multiple lines of indirect evidence supporting the validity of our <i>in silico</i> data.</p>","PeriodicalId":10715,"journal":{"name":"Computational and structural biotechnology journal","volume":"27 ","pages":"4048-4064"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discovery of diverse chimeric peptides in a eukaryotic proteome sets the stage for experimental validation of the mosaic translation hypothesis.\",\"authors\":\"Umut Çakır, Noujoud Gabed, Yunus Emre Köroğlu, Selen Kaya, Senjuti Sinharoy, Vagner A Benedito, Marie Brunet, Xavier Roucou, Igor S Kryvoruchko\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csbj.2025.09.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The high complexity of eukaryotic organisms enabled their evolutionary success, driven by the diversification of their proteomes. Various mechanisms contributed to this process. Alternative splicing had the largest known impact among these mechanisms. Earlier, we hypothesized that along with alternative splicing, a different but conceptually similar mechanism creates novel versions of existing proteins in all eukaryotes. However, this mechanism operates at the level of translation, where amino acid sequence novelty arises through multiple programmed ribosomal frameshifting events occurring within the same transcript. This mechanism, which is termed mosaic translation, is very difficult to demonstrate even with the most up-to-date molecular tools. Thus, it remained unnoticed so far. Using a subset of mass spectrometry proteomic data from various organs of the model plant <i>Medicago truncatula</i>, we took the first step toward experimental validation of this hypothesis. Our original <i>in silico</i> approach resulted in the discovery of two candidates for mosaic proteins (homologs of EF1α and RuBisCo) and 154 candidates for chimeric peptides. Chimeric peptides and polypeptides are produced in the course of one ribosomal frameshifting event and may correspond to parts of mosaic proteins. In addition, our analysis reveals the possibility of translation of chimeric peptides from five ribosomal RNA transcripts, ten long non-coding RNA transcripts, and one transfer RNA transcript. These findings are novel and will form the basis for future experimental validation. We also present multiple lines of indirect evidence supporting the validity of our <i>in silico</i> data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational and structural biotechnology journal\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"4048-4064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481079/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational and structural biotechnology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2025.09.019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational and structural biotechnology journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2025.09.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discovery of diverse chimeric peptides in a eukaryotic proteome sets the stage for experimental validation of the mosaic translation hypothesis.
The high complexity of eukaryotic organisms enabled their evolutionary success, driven by the diversification of their proteomes. Various mechanisms contributed to this process. Alternative splicing had the largest known impact among these mechanisms. Earlier, we hypothesized that along with alternative splicing, a different but conceptually similar mechanism creates novel versions of existing proteins in all eukaryotes. However, this mechanism operates at the level of translation, where amino acid sequence novelty arises through multiple programmed ribosomal frameshifting events occurring within the same transcript. This mechanism, which is termed mosaic translation, is very difficult to demonstrate even with the most up-to-date molecular tools. Thus, it remained unnoticed so far. Using a subset of mass spectrometry proteomic data from various organs of the model plant Medicago truncatula, we took the first step toward experimental validation of this hypothesis. Our original in silico approach resulted in the discovery of two candidates for mosaic proteins (homologs of EF1α and RuBisCo) and 154 candidates for chimeric peptides. Chimeric peptides and polypeptides are produced in the course of one ribosomal frameshifting event and may correspond to parts of mosaic proteins. In addition, our analysis reveals the possibility of translation of chimeric peptides from five ribosomal RNA transcripts, ten long non-coding RNA transcripts, and one transfer RNA transcript. These findings are novel and will form the basis for future experimental validation. We also present multiple lines of indirect evidence supporting the validity of our in silico data.
期刊介绍:
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (CSBJ) is an online gold open access journal publishing research articles and reviews after full peer review. All articles are published, without barriers to access, immediately upon acceptance. The journal places a strong emphasis on functional and mechanistic understanding of how molecular components in a biological process work together through the application of computational methods. Structural data may provide such insights, but they are not a pre-requisite for publication in the journal. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
Structure and function of proteins, nucleic acids and other macromolecules
Structure and function of multi-component complexes
Protein folding, processing and degradation
Enzymology
Computational and structural studies of plant systems
Microbial Informatics
Genomics
Proteomics
Metabolomics
Algorithms and Hypothesis in Bioinformatics
Mathematical and Theoretical Biology
Computational Chemistry and Drug Discovery
Microscopy and Molecular Imaging
Nanotechnology
Systems and Synthetic Biology