奥氮平加三联止吐治疗预防卡铂引起的恶心:两项临床试验的汇总分析

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Suguru Kojima, Naoki Inui, Takahito Suzuki, Kazuki Tanaka, Masato Karayama, Yusuke Inoue, Hideki Yasui, Hironao Hozumi, Yuzo Suzuki, Kazuki Furuhashi, Tomoyuki Fujisawa, Noriyuki Enomoto, Koji Nishimoto, Shun Matsuura, Dai Hashimoto, Takashi Matsui, Kazuhiro Asada, Takafumi Suda
{"title":"奥氮平加三联止吐治疗预防卡铂引起的恶心:两项临床试验的汇总分析","authors":"Suguru Kojima, Naoki Inui, Takahito Suzuki, Kazuki Tanaka, Masato Karayama, Yusuke Inoue, Hideki Yasui, Hironao Hozumi, Yuzo Suzuki, Kazuki Furuhashi, Tomoyuki Fujisawa, Noriyuki Enomoto, Koji Nishimoto, Shun Matsuura, Dai Hashimoto, Takashi Matsui, Kazuhiro Asada, Takafumi Suda","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14985-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a common adverse event of cancer treatments. Despite prophylactic antiemetic treatment, nausea remains a particular problem. We aimed to identify risk factors and clarify the usefulness of olanzapine for the control of carboplatin-induced nausea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pooled analysis of data from a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial and a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. We combined data from two trials with similar inclusion and exclusion criteria and treatment schedules. Chemotherapy-naïve patients aged ≥ 20 years with solid cancers who were scheduled to receive a first course of carboplatin-containing chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups received olanzapine 5 mg or placebo, respectively, in combination with the neurokinin-1 (NK<sub>1</sub>) receptor antagonist aprepitant, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT<sub>3</sub>) receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone. Olanzapine was administered on days 1-4 after the evening meal. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without nausea in the overall phase (0-120 h). Intergroup differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in each phase and population. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors associated with nausea, appetite loss, and complete response (no vomiting and no rescue medication use) rate. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% CIs, and p-values for each background factor were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 388 patients were evaluated (79.4% male, median age 72 years), including 208 patients in the olanzapine group. Overall, 87.5% in the olanzapine group and 75.0% in the placebo group were free of nausea (intergroup difference 12.5%, 95% CI, 4.7-20.3, p = 0.002), and the difference in proportion of patients reporting no appetite loss was 20.6% (95% CI, 11.5-29.6, p < 0.001). The overall complete response rates were 88.0% in the olanzapine group and 80.6% in the placebo group (p = 0.049). Multivariable analysis only identified no olanzapine use as significantly associated with a decreased risk of nausea (adjusted OR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.26-0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis revealed that adding olanzapine to triple antiemetic therapy was associated with improved control of carboplatin-induced nausea.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN) 000026739, registered on 1 April 2017 and 000037749, registered on 1 September 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Olanzapine plus triple antiemetic therapy for prevention of carboplatin-induced nausea: a pooled analysis of two clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Suguru Kojima, Naoki Inui, Takahito Suzuki, Kazuki Tanaka, Masato Karayama, Yusuke Inoue, Hideki Yasui, Hironao Hozumi, Yuzo Suzuki, Kazuki Furuhashi, Tomoyuki Fujisawa, Noriyuki Enomoto, Koji Nishimoto, Shun Matsuura, Dai Hashimoto, Takashi Matsui, Kazuhiro Asada, Takafumi Suda\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-025-14985-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a common adverse event of cancer treatments. Despite prophylactic antiemetic treatment, nausea remains a particular problem. We aimed to identify risk factors and clarify the usefulness of olanzapine for the control of carboplatin-induced nausea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pooled analysis of data from a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial and a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. We combined data from two trials with similar inclusion and exclusion criteria and treatment schedules. Chemotherapy-naïve patients aged ≥ 20 years with solid cancers who were scheduled to receive a first course of carboplatin-containing chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups received olanzapine 5 mg or placebo, respectively, in combination with the neurokinin-1 (NK<sub>1</sub>) receptor antagonist aprepitant, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT<sub>3</sub>) receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone. Olanzapine was administered on days 1-4 after the evening meal. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without nausea in the overall phase (0-120 h). Intergroup differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in each phase and population. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors associated with nausea, appetite loss, and complete response (no vomiting and no rescue medication use) rate. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% CIs, and p-values for each background factor were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 388 patients were evaluated (79.4% male, median age 72 years), including 208 patients in the olanzapine group. Overall, 87.5% in the olanzapine group and 75.0% in the placebo group were free of nausea (intergroup difference 12.5%, 95% CI, 4.7-20.3, p = 0.002), and the difference in proportion of patients reporting no appetite loss was 20.6% (95% CI, 11.5-29.6, p < 0.001). The overall complete response rates were 88.0% in the olanzapine group and 80.6% in the placebo group (p = 0.049). Multivariable analysis only identified no olanzapine use as significantly associated with a decreased risk of nausea (adjusted OR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.26-0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis revealed that adding olanzapine to triple antiemetic therapy was associated with improved control of carboplatin-induced nausea.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN) 000026739, registered on 1 April 2017 and 000037749, registered on 1 September 2019.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486796/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14985-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14985-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:化疗引起的恶心和呕吐是癌症治疗中常见的不良事件。尽管预防性止吐治疗,恶心仍然是一个特殊的问题。我们的目的是确定危险因素,并阐明奥氮平对控制卡铂诱导的恶心的有效性。方法:这是一项来自单臂、开放标签、II期试验和一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的III期试验的数据汇总分析。我们合并了两项具有相似纳入和排除标准和治疗方案的试验的数据。Chemotherapy-naïve年龄≥20岁的实体癌患者计划接受第一疗程含卡铂化疗。奥氮平组和安慰剂组患者分别接受奥氮平5mg或安慰剂,联合神经激肽-1 (NK1)受体拮抗剂阿瑞匹坦、5-羟色胺-3 (5- ht3)受体拮抗剂和地塞米松。奥氮平于第1-4天晚餐后给药。主要终点是在整个阶段(0-120小时)无恶心的患者比例。估计各组间差异及其95%置信区间(ci)。进行单变量和多变量logistic回归分析,以确定与恶心、食欲减退和完全缓解(无呕吐和无抢救用药)率相关的危险因素。计算每个背景因素的优势比(ORs)、95% ci和p值。结果:共评估388例患者(男性79.4%,中位年龄72岁),其中奥氮平组208例。总体而言,87.5%的奥氮平组和75.0%的安慰剂组无恶心症状(组间差异12.5%,95% CI, 4.7-20.3, p = 0.002),报告无食欲下降的患者比例差异为20.6% (95% CI, 11.5-29.6, p)。结论:该分析显示,在三次止吐治疗中加入奥氮平与卡铂诱导的恶心控制改善有关。试验注册:该试验在大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册中心(UMIN) 000026739注册于2017年4月1日,000037749注册于2019年9月1日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Olanzapine plus triple antiemetic therapy for prevention of carboplatin-induced nausea: a pooled analysis of two clinical trials.

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a common adverse event of cancer treatments. Despite prophylactic antiemetic treatment, nausea remains a particular problem. We aimed to identify risk factors and clarify the usefulness of olanzapine for the control of carboplatin-induced nausea.

Methods: This was a pooled analysis of data from a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial and a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. We combined data from two trials with similar inclusion and exclusion criteria and treatment schedules. Chemotherapy-naïve patients aged ≥ 20 years with solid cancers who were scheduled to receive a first course of carboplatin-containing chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups received olanzapine 5 mg or placebo, respectively, in combination with the neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist aprepitant, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone. Olanzapine was administered on days 1-4 after the evening meal. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without nausea in the overall phase (0-120 h). Intergroup differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in each phase and population. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors associated with nausea, appetite loss, and complete response (no vomiting and no rescue medication use) rate. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% CIs, and p-values for each background factor were calculated.

Results: A total of 388 patients were evaluated (79.4% male, median age 72 years), including 208 patients in the olanzapine group. Overall, 87.5% in the olanzapine group and 75.0% in the placebo group were free of nausea (intergroup difference 12.5%, 95% CI, 4.7-20.3, p = 0.002), and the difference in proportion of patients reporting no appetite loss was 20.6% (95% CI, 11.5-29.6, p < 0.001). The overall complete response rates were 88.0% in the olanzapine group and 80.6% in the placebo group (p = 0.049). Multivariable analysis only identified no olanzapine use as significantly associated with a decreased risk of nausea (adjusted OR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.26-0.76).

Conclusions: This analysis revealed that adding olanzapine to triple antiemetic therapy was associated with improved control of carboplatin-induced nausea.

Trial registration: The trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN) 000026739, registered on 1 April 2017 and 000037749, registered on 1 September 2019.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信