低剂量能量积分检测器与光子计数检测器与拟人化幻影胸部CT肺部定量测量的比较。

IF 1.6 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Natally ALArab, Marrissa McIntosh, Junfeng Guo, Abhilash Srikumar Kizhakke Puliyakote, Jarron Atha, Jessica Sieren, Eric A Hoffman, Ehsan Abadi, Sean B Fain
{"title":"低剂量能量积分检测器与光子计数检测器与拟人化幻影胸部CT肺部定量测量的比较。","authors":"Natally ALArab, Marrissa McIntosh, Junfeng Guo, Abhilash Srikumar Kizhakke Puliyakote, Jarron Atha, Jessica Sieren, Eric A Hoffman, Ehsan Abadi, Sean B Fain","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ae0e27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) promises improved resolution and contrast at reduced X-ray dose compared to energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. To determine the parameters that achieve robust accuracy of quantitative measures in chest PCD-CT studies compared to quantitative EID-CT at low CT dose. The Kyoto LUNGMAN chest phantom with preserved lung tissue core and NIST-calibrated foam density standards (4-20 lbs.), and the COPD Lung Phantom II with six airways of various outer and inner diameters, were scanned using PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha) and EID-CT (SOMATOM Force) with a target CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 2.2 mGy to match that specified for ongoing longitudinal quantitative chest CT studies of chronic lung disease. Mean density of foam inserts and mean lumen area (LA) and wall thickness (WT) of COPD Lung Phantom II were automatically segmented, analyzed, and compared using the root mean squared error (RMSE). Contrast-to-noise (CNR) and signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios were also automatically calculated. Large (11.2 mm) and small (5.5 mm) airway LA and WT in the lung tissue core were semi-automatically measured. PCD-CT with the Qr40 kernel yielded superior foam density accuracy (RMSE: 6.1-7.8 HU) compared to EID-CT (RMSE: 9.7 HU). Q+UHR mode with Qr64 and a 1024×1024 matrix achieved the highest airway accuracy (RMSE <1.8 mm² for LA and <0.3 mm for WT). However, these protocols showed increased variability in tracheal air measurements (SD up to 9 HU), indicating a trade-off between higher spatial resolution and measurement repeatability. At equivalent low radiation dose (2.2 mGy CTDIvol), PCD-CT outperforms EID-CT in quantitative accuracy for foam density and airway measurements, with comparable SNR and CNR. These results support the use of PCD-CT for quantitative lung imaging in longitudinal studies, provided reconstruction settings are selected to balance accuracy and repeatability.&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Quantitative Lung Measures in Low Dose Energy-Integrating Detector and Photon-Counting Detector Chest CT with an Anthropomorphic Phantom.\",\"authors\":\"Natally ALArab, Marrissa McIntosh, Junfeng Guo, Abhilash Srikumar Kizhakke Puliyakote, Jarron Atha, Jessica Sieren, Eric A Hoffman, Ehsan Abadi, Sean B Fain\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2057-1976/ae0e27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) promises improved resolution and contrast at reduced X-ray dose compared to energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. To determine the parameters that achieve robust accuracy of quantitative measures in chest PCD-CT studies compared to quantitative EID-CT at low CT dose. The Kyoto LUNGMAN chest phantom with preserved lung tissue core and NIST-calibrated foam density standards (4-20 lbs.), and the COPD Lung Phantom II with six airways of various outer and inner diameters, were scanned using PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha) and EID-CT (SOMATOM Force) with a target CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 2.2 mGy to match that specified for ongoing longitudinal quantitative chest CT studies of chronic lung disease. Mean density of foam inserts and mean lumen area (LA) and wall thickness (WT) of COPD Lung Phantom II were automatically segmented, analyzed, and compared using the root mean squared error (RMSE). Contrast-to-noise (CNR) and signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios were also automatically calculated. Large (11.2 mm) and small (5.5 mm) airway LA and WT in the lung tissue core were semi-automatically measured. PCD-CT with the Qr40 kernel yielded superior foam density accuracy (RMSE: 6.1-7.8 HU) compared to EID-CT (RMSE: 9.7 HU). Q+UHR mode with Qr64 and a 1024×1024 matrix achieved the highest airway accuracy (RMSE <1.8 mm² for LA and <0.3 mm for WT). However, these protocols showed increased variability in tracheal air measurements (SD up to 9 HU), indicating a trade-off between higher spatial resolution and measurement repeatability. At equivalent low radiation dose (2.2 mGy CTDIvol), PCD-CT outperforms EID-CT in quantitative accuracy for foam density and airway measurements, with comparable SNR and CNR. These results support the use of PCD-CT for quantitative lung imaging in longitudinal studies, provided reconstruction settings are selected to balance accuracy and repeatability.&#xD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae0e27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae0e27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与能量积分检测器(EID) CT相比,光子计数检测器(PCD)计算机断层扫描(CT)有望在降低x射线剂量的情况下提高分辨率和对比度。在低CT剂量下,与定量EID-CT相比,确定在胸部PCD-CT研究中实现定量测量可靠准确性的参数。使用PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha)和EID-CT (SOMATOM Force)扫描具有保留肺组织核心和nist校准泡沫密度标准(4-20磅)的Kyoto LUNGMAN胸影,以及具有不同内外直径的六个气道的COPD肺影II,目标CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)为2.2 mGy,以匹配正在进行的慢性肺部疾病纵向定量胸部CT研究指定的剂量。使用均方根误差(RMSE)自动分割、分析和比较COPD肺幻影II的平均泡沫插入密度和平均管腔面积(LA)和壁厚(WT)。同时自动计算噪声比(CNR)和信噪比(SNR)。半自动测量大(11.2 mm)和小(5.5 mm)气道肺组织核心LA和WT。与EID-CT (RMSE: 9.7 HU)相比,带有Qr40内核的PCD-CT产生了更好的泡沫密度精度(RMSE: 6.1-7.8 HU)。Qr64和1024×1024矩阵的Q+UHR模式获得了最高的气道精度(RMSE)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Quantitative Lung Measures in Low Dose Energy-Integrating Detector and Photon-Counting Detector Chest CT with an Anthropomorphic Phantom.

Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) promises improved resolution and contrast at reduced X-ray dose compared to energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. To determine the parameters that achieve robust accuracy of quantitative measures in chest PCD-CT studies compared to quantitative EID-CT at low CT dose. The Kyoto LUNGMAN chest phantom with preserved lung tissue core and NIST-calibrated foam density standards (4-20 lbs.), and the COPD Lung Phantom II with six airways of various outer and inner diameters, were scanned using PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha) and EID-CT (SOMATOM Force) with a target CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 2.2 mGy to match that specified for ongoing longitudinal quantitative chest CT studies of chronic lung disease. Mean density of foam inserts and mean lumen area (LA) and wall thickness (WT) of COPD Lung Phantom II were automatically segmented, analyzed, and compared using the root mean squared error (RMSE). Contrast-to-noise (CNR) and signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios were also automatically calculated. Large (11.2 mm) and small (5.5 mm) airway LA and WT in the lung tissue core were semi-automatically measured. PCD-CT with the Qr40 kernel yielded superior foam density accuracy (RMSE: 6.1-7.8 HU) compared to EID-CT (RMSE: 9.7 HU). Q+UHR mode with Qr64 and a 1024×1024 matrix achieved the highest airway accuracy (RMSE <1.8 mm² for LA and <0.3 mm for WT). However, these protocols showed increased variability in tracheal air measurements (SD up to 9 HU), indicating a trade-off between higher spatial resolution and measurement repeatability. At equivalent low radiation dose (2.2 mGy CTDIvol), PCD-CT outperforms EID-CT in quantitative accuracy for foam density and airway measurements, with comparable SNR and CNR. These results support the use of PCD-CT for quantitative lung imaging in longitudinal studies, provided reconstruction settings are selected to balance accuracy and repeatability. .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信