工作场所与创伤知情支持服务合作的好处:一项定性研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jacinta Evans, Katherine Piech, Samantha Stark
{"title":"工作场所与创伤知情支持服务合作的好处:一项定性研究。","authors":"Jacinta Evans, Katherine Piech, Samantha Stark","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13398-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma-informed services can benefit people involved in a healthcare or legal process by supporting them to engage with systems and minimise risk of retraumatisation. Research also suggests that the integration of trauma-informed services can benefit staff members who work with these services. This study sought to explore outcomes for staff members following the introduction of a trauma-informed navigation and support service for victim-survivors involved in sexual boundary violation complaints lodged with the Australian health practitioner regulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers conducted a series of semi-structured interviews (n = 13) with regulatory staff members who had engaged with the support service. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to qualify participant experiences and detail outcomes of working with the service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes related to outcomes of collaborating with the support service were identified: (1) additional support for engagement work, (2) changes to interactions with victim-survivors (notifiers), (3) personal benefits of collaboration, and (4) improved perception of workload. These themes showed that staff identified positive collaboration with the service and benefits resulting from that collaboration. However, a negative case analysis identified perspectives that did not fit with the main interpretation of the data, where participants did not see a clear need for the service. This demonstrates some of the challenges implicit to integrating a new service within an organisation, including how perception of benefits can be limited due to conflicting personal or professional ideologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Staff within a national regulator identified personal and professional benefits resulting from workplace collaboration with a trauma-informed service introduced to support victim-survivors. With the introduction of any new service, challenges can arise, and thoughtful planning is required prior and during implementation to understand individual and environmental factors that may impact integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of workplace collaboration with a trauma-informed support service: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Jacinta Evans, Katherine Piech, Samantha Stark\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-13398-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma-informed services can benefit people involved in a healthcare or legal process by supporting them to engage with systems and minimise risk of retraumatisation. Research also suggests that the integration of trauma-informed services can benefit staff members who work with these services. This study sought to explore outcomes for staff members following the introduction of a trauma-informed navigation and support service for victim-survivors involved in sexual boundary violation complaints lodged with the Australian health practitioner regulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers conducted a series of semi-structured interviews (n = 13) with regulatory staff members who had engaged with the support service. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to qualify participant experiences and detail outcomes of working with the service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes related to outcomes of collaborating with the support service were identified: (1) additional support for engagement work, (2) changes to interactions with victim-survivors (notifiers), (3) personal benefits of collaboration, and (4) improved perception of workload. These themes showed that staff identified positive collaboration with the service and benefits resulting from that collaboration. However, a negative case analysis identified perspectives that did not fit with the main interpretation of the data, where participants did not see a clear need for the service. This demonstrates some of the challenges implicit to integrating a new service within an organisation, including how perception of benefits can be limited due to conflicting personal or professional ideologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Staff within a national regulator identified personal and professional benefits resulting from workplace collaboration with a trauma-informed service introduced to support victim-survivors. With the introduction of any new service, challenges can arise, and thoughtful planning is required prior and during implementation to understand individual and environmental factors that may impact integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13398-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13398-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤知情服务可以使参与医疗保健或法律程序的人受益,支持他们参与系统并最大限度地减少再创伤的风险。研究还表明,创伤知情服务的整合可以使从事这些服务的工作人员受益。本研究旨在探讨工作人员在向澳大利亚卫生从业人员监管机构提出性边界侵犯投诉的受害者-幸存者引入创伤知情导航和支持服务后的结果。方法:研究人员对参与支持服务的监管工作人员进行了一系列半结构化访谈(n = 13)。使用反身性专题分析来分析访谈记录,以确定参与者的经验和与服务合作的详细结果。结果:确定了与支持服务合作的结果相关的四个主要主题:(1)对参与工作的额外支持,(2)与受害者-幸存者(通知者)互动的变化,(3)合作的个人利益,以及(4)工作量感知的改善。这些主题表明,工作人员确定了与该处的积极合作以及这种合作所产生的利益。然而,负面案例分析确定了与数据的主要解释不相符的观点,其中参与者没有看到对该服务的明确需求。这表明了在组织中集成新服务所隐含的一些挑战,包括由于个人或职业意识形态的冲突,如何限制对利益的感知。结论:国家监管机构的工作人员确定了工作场所与创伤知情服务合作所带来的个人和专业利益,该服务旨在支持受害者-幸存者。随着任何新服务的引入,都会出现挑战,需要在实施之前和实施过程中进行周密的规划,以了解可能影响集成的个人和环境因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits of workplace collaboration with a trauma-informed support service: a qualitative study.

Background: Trauma-informed services can benefit people involved in a healthcare or legal process by supporting them to engage with systems and minimise risk of retraumatisation. Research also suggests that the integration of trauma-informed services can benefit staff members who work with these services. This study sought to explore outcomes for staff members following the introduction of a trauma-informed navigation and support service for victim-survivors involved in sexual boundary violation complaints lodged with the Australian health practitioner regulator.

Methods: Researchers conducted a series of semi-structured interviews (n = 13) with regulatory staff members who had engaged with the support service. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to qualify participant experiences and detail outcomes of working with the service.

Results: Four main themes related to outcomes of collaborating with the support service were identified: (1) additional support for engagement work, (2) changes to interactions with victim-survivors (notifiers), (3) personal benefits of collaboration, and (4) improved perception of workload. These themes showed that staff identified positive collaboration with the service and benefits resulting from that collaboration. However, a negative case analysis identified perspectives that did not fit with the main interpretation of the data, where participants did not see a clear need for the service. This demonstrates some of the challenges implicit to integrating a new service within an organisation, including how perception of benefits can be limited due to conflicting personal or professional ideologies.

Conclusions: Staff within a national regulator identified personal and professional benefits resulting from workplace collaboration with a trauma-informed service introduced to support victim-survivors. With the introduction of any new service, challenges can arise, and thoughtful planning is required prior and during implementation to understand individual and environmental factors that may impact integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信