标准化治疗中的种族差异和(非)依从性:通过公平视角的影响。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nina Halberg, Mari Holen, Trine Schifter Larsen
{"title":"标准化治疗中的种族差异和(非)依从性:通过公平视角的影响。","authors":"Nina Halberg, Mari Holen, Trine Schifter Larsen","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13477-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to achieve optimal outcomes for patients, standardized treatment has gained traction in recent years. By unifying care based on the best available evidence, standardized treatment has been described as a means to mitigate health disparities. Despite this aim, ethnic and racial disparities are well-described. Standardized treatment depends on adherence from patients. However, how staff position patients' health behavior and assess, adapt, and intervene to improve adherence is underexplored. In this article, we aim to investigate how ethnically minoritized patients' health behavior is positioned under a gaze of (non)adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an ethnographic study based on nine months of fieldwork in two orthopedic departments in Denmark. The work of both departments is based on the standardized concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). The participants include patients (n = 13), relatives (n = 6), and hospital staff (n = 79). The data were analyzed using abductive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis shows that when ethnically minoritized patients were positioned as nonadherent, the staff drew on essentialist and stereotypical problematizations of ethnicity to accommodate perceived differences. In this manner, ethnicity was connected to ideas of cultural food habits, collectivist family structures and un-stoic and exaggerated pain behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper advances knowledge on how inequitable care and treatment manifests in clinical practice, illustrating how dominant understandings and conceptualizations at the intersections of health, ethnicity, and (non)adherence produce marginalization in standardized pathways. Ultimately, perceived non-adherence has important consequences for minoritized patients, as we find that it causes potential inaccessibility to standardized pathways due to ideas of ineligibility, undertreatment of pain, as well as underrepresentation of minorities in patient seminars and even same-day surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnic disparities and (non)adherence in standardized treatment: implications through an equity lens.\",\"authors\":\"Nina Halberg, Mari Holen, Trine Schifter Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-13477-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to achieve optimal outcomes for patients, standardized treatment has gained traction in recent years. By unifying care based on the best available evidence, standardized treatment has been described as a means to mitigate health disparities. Despite this aim, ethnic and racial disparities are well-described. Standardized treatment depends on adherence from patients. However, how staff position patients' health behavior and assess, adapt, and intervene to improve adherence is underexplored. In this article, we aim to investigate how ethnically minoritized patients' health behavior is positioned under a gaze of (non)adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an ethnographic study based on nine months of fieldwork in two orthopedic departments in Denmark. The work of both departments is based on the standardized concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). The participants include patients (n = 13), relatives (n = 6), and hospital staff (n = 79). The data were analyzed using abductive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis shows that when ethnically minoritized patients were positioned as nonadherent, the staff drew on essentialist and stereotypical problematizations of ethnicity to accommodate perceived differences. In this manner, ethnicity was connected to ideas of cultural food habits, collectivist family structures and un-stoic and exaggerated pain behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper advances knowledge on how inequitable care and treatment manifests in clinical practice, illustrating how dominant understandings and conceptualizations at the intersections of health, ethnicity, and (non)adherence produce marginalization in standardized pathways. Ultimately, perceived non-adherence has important consequences for minoritized patients, as we find that it causes potential inaccessibility to standardized pathways due to ideas of ineligibility, undertreatment of pain, as well as underrepresentation of minorities in patient seminars and even same-day surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487202/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13477-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13477-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了使患者获得最佳的治疗效果,标准化治疗近年来得到了广泛的关注。标准化治疗已被描述为一种减轻健康差距的手段,通过基于现有最佳证据的统一护理。尽管有这样的目标,民族和种族差异还是被很好地描述了。标准化治疗取决于患者的坚持。然而,工作人员如何定位患者的健康行为和评估,适应和干预,以提高依从性尚未得到充分探讨。在这篇文章中,我们的目的是调查少数民族患者的健康行为是如何定位在凝视(非)依从。方法:这是一项民族志研究,基于在丹麦两个骨科9个月的实地调查。这两个部门的工作都是基于标准化的术后恢复(ERAS)概念。参与者包括患者(n = 13)、亲属(n = 6)和医院工作人员(n = 79)。采用溯因分析法对数据进行分析。结果:分析表明,当少数民族患者被定位为非依从性时,工作人员利用本质主义和刻板的种族问题化来适应感知到的差异。通过这种方式,种族与文化饮食习惯、集体主义家庭结构以及非禁欲和夸大痛苦行为的观念联系在一起。结论:本文推进了关于不公平护理和治疗如何在临床实践中表现出来的知识,说明了在健康、种族和(非)依从性的交叉点上的主流理解和概念化如何在标准化途径中产生边缘化。最终,感知到的不依从性对少数群体患者有重要的影响,因为我们发现,由于不合格的想法,疼痛治疗不足,以及少数群体在患者研讨会甚至当天手术中的代表性不足,它会导致潜在的标准化途径无法获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnic disparities and (non)adherence in standardized treatment: implications through an equity lens.

Background: In order to achieve optimal outcomes for patients, standardized treatment has gained traction in recent years. By unifying care based on the best available evidence, standardized treatment has been described as a means to mitigate health disparities. Despite this aim, ethnic and racial disparities are well-described. Standardized treatment depends on adherence from patients. However, how staff position patients' health behavior and assess, adapt, and intervene to improve adherence is underexplored. In this article, we aim to investigate how ethnically minoritized patients' health behavior is positioned under a gaze of (non)adherence.

Methods: This is an ethnographic study based on nine months of fieldwork in two orthopedic departments in Denmark. The work of both departments is based on the standardized concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). The participants include patients (n = 13), relatives (n = 6), and hospital staff (n = 79). The data were analyzed using abductive analysis.

Results: The analysis shows that when ethnically minoritized patients were positioned as nonadherent, the staff drew on essentialist and stereotypical problematizations of ethnicity to accommodate perceived differences. In this manner, ethnicity was connected to ideas of cultural food habits, collectivist family structures and un-stoic and exaggerated pain behavior.

Conclusions: This paper advances knowledge on how inequitable care and treatment manifests in clinical practice, illustrating how dominant understandings and conceptualizations at the intersections of health, ethnicity, and (non)adherence produce marginalization in standardized pathways. Ultimately, perceived non-adherence has important consequences for minoritized patients, as we find that it causes potential inaccessibility to standardized pathways due to ideas of ineligibility, undertreatment of pain, as well as underrepresentation of minorities in patient seminars and even same-day surgeries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信