剖析真实世界记忆临床队列异质性:使用HYDRA分析神经解剖学亚型。

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gordon Zhaoqi An, Yunchang Xie, Tammie L S Benzinger, Brian A Gordon, Aristeidis Sotiras
{"title":"剖析真实世界记忆临床队列异质性:使用HYDRA分析神经解剖学亚型。","authors":"Gordon Zhaoqi An, Yunchang Xie, Tammie L S Benzinger, Brian A Gordon, Aristeidis Sotiras","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01850-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is significant evidence for neuroanatomical heterogeneity in neurodegenerative disorders, which has been demonstrated predominantly through analyses of well-characterized research cohorts. Despite the known diversity in clinical presentations among patients attending memory clinics, studies exploring neuroanatomical heterogeneity in such clinically diverse groups remain sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this gap, we applied the semi-supervised Heterogeneity through Discriminative Analysis (HYDRA) (Neuroimage 145:346-364 2017) machine learning method to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) (NeuroImage 26:102248 2020) to uncover patterns of neurostructural heterogeneity in memory clinic attendees. Cross-validation was used to assess clustering stability via the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), Silhouette Score, and Calinski-Harabasz Index (CHI). We performed survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier curves and mixed-effects models for longitudinal cognitive data (e.g., memory, executive function, and language assessments) to examine differences in disease progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cross-validation analyses indicated two highly stable subtypes of cognitively impaired individuals (ARI = 0.552), exhibiting significant neuroanatomical differences. Subtype 1, termed the Temporal-Sparing Atrophy (TSA) Subtype, was defined by relatively mild atrophy, especially in temporal areas, with slower cognitive decline and preserved Function across most domains. Subtype 2, termed the Temporal-Parietal Predominated Atrophy (TPPA) Subtype, was marked by notable alterations in areas critically affected in neurodegenerative disorders. These included key areas critical for executive function and memory, such as the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices including the precuneus. Longitudinal analysis of neuroimaging and cognitive data revealed contrasting trajectories. The TSA Subtype demonstrated a gradual decline in cognitive functions over time, particularly in the assessments that are memory-focused tests. Conversely, the TPPA Subtype exhibited a more severe decline in these functions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research illustrates that neurodegenerative diseases present a spectrum of structural brain changes rather than uniform pathology, suggesting that future research may benefit from stratified therapeutic approaches and targeted recruitment strategies for clinical trials. By leveraging detailed clinical assessments and longitudinal data, including uncertain diagnoses and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores, this study contributes to better understanding/characterizing memory clinic populations, which could help with optimizing interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"215"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissecting real-world memory clinical cohort heterogeneity: analysis of neuroanatomical subtypes using HYDRA.\",\"authors\":\"Gordon Zhaoqi An, Yunchang Xie, Tammie L S Benzinger, Brian A Gordon, Aristeidis Sotiras\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13195-025-01850-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is significant evidence for neuroanatomical heterogeneity in neurodegenerative disorders, which has been demonstrated predominantly through analyses of well-characterized research cohorts. Despite the known diversity in clinical presentations among patients attending memory clinics, studies exploring neuroanatomical heterogeneity in such clinically diverse groups remain sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this gap, we applied the semi-supervised Heterogeneity through Discriminative Analysis (HYDRA) (Neuroimage 145:346-364 2017) machine learning method to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) (NeuroImage 26:102248 2020) to uncover patterns of neurostructural heterogeneity in memory clinic attendees. Cross-validation was used to assess clustering stability via the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), Silhouette Score, and Calinski-Harabasz Index (CHI). We performed survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier curves and mixed-effects models for longitudinal cognitive data (e.g., memory, executive function, and language assessments) to examine differences in disease progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cross-validation analyses indicated two highly stable subtypes of cognitively impaired individuals (ARI = 0.552), exhibiting significant neuroanatomical differences. Subtype 1, termed the Temporal-Sparing Atrophy (TSA) Subtype, was defined by relatively mild atrophy, especially in temporal areas, with slower cognitive decline and preserved Function across most domains. Subtype 2, termed the Temporal-Parietal Predominated Atrophy (TPPA) Subtype, was marked by notable alterations in areas critically affected in neurodegenerative disorders. These included key areas critical for executive function and memory, such as the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices including the precuneus. Longitudinal analysis of neuroimaging and cognitive data revealed contrasting trajectories. The TSA Subtype demonstrated a gradual decline in cognitive functions over time, particularly in the assessments that are memory-focused tests. Conversely, the TPPA Subtype exhibited a more severe decline in these functions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research illustrates that neurodegenerative diseases present a spectrum of structural brain changes rather than uniform pathology, suggesting that future research may benefit from stratified therapeutic approaches and targeted recruitment strategies for clinical trials. By leveraging detailed clinical assessments and longitudinal data, including uncertain diagnoses and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores, this study contributes to better understanding/characterizing memory clinic populations, which could help with optimizing interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01850-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01850-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经退行性疾病存在显著的神经解剖学异质性,这主要是通过对具有良好特征的研究队列的分析来证明的。尽管在参加记忆诊所的患者的临床表现中存在已知的多样性,但在这种临床多样化的群体中探索神经解剖学异质性的研究仍然很少。为了解决这一差距,我们通过判别分析(HYDRA) (Neuroimage 145:346-364 2017)机器学习方法将半监督异质性应用于来自开放获取成像研究系列(OASIS) (Neuroimage 26:102248 2020)的磁共振成像(MRI)数据,以揭示记忆诊所参与者的神经结构异质性模式。交叉验证通过调整兰德指数(ARI)、廓形评分和Calinski-Harabasz指数(CHI)来评估聚类稳定性。我们使用Kaplan-Meier曲线和纵向认知数据(如记忆、执行功能和语言评估)的混合效应模型进行生存分析,以检查疾病进展的差异。结果:交叉验证分析显示两种高度稳定的认知障碍个体亚型(ARI = 0.552),表现出显著的神经解剖学差异。亚型1,被称为颞保留性萎缩(TSA)亚型,定义为相对轻微的萎缩,特别是在颞区,认知能力下降较慢,大多数领域的功能保留。亚型2,被称为颞顶叶显性萎缩(TPPA)亚型,在神经退行性疾病中受到严重影响的区域发生显著改变。其中包括对执行功能和记忆至关重要的关键区域,如额叶、颞叶和包括楔前叶在内的顶叶皮层。神经影像学和认知数据的纵向分析揭示了截然不同的轨迹。随着时间的推移,TSA亚型表现出认知功能的逐渐下降,尤其是在以记忆为重点的测试中。相反,TPPA亚型在这些功能上表现出更严重的下降。结论:本研究表明,神经退行性疾病呈现出一系列大脑结构变化,而不是统一的病理,这表明未来的研究可能受益于分层治疗方法和临床试验的靶向招募策略。通过利用详细的临床评估和纵向数据,包括不确定的诊断和临床痴呆评分(CDR),本研究有助于更好地了解/表征临床人群的记忆,这有助于优化干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dissecting real-world memory clinical cohort heterogeneity: analysis of neuroanatomical subtypes using HYDRA.

Dissecting real-world memory clinical cohort heterogeneity: analysis of neuroanatomical subtypes using HYDRA.

Dissecting real-world memory clinical cohort heterogeneity: analysis of neuroanatomical subtypes using HYDRA.

Dissecting real-world memory clinical cohort heterogeneity: analysis of neuroanatomical subtypes using HYDRA.

Background: There is significant evidence for neuroanatomical heterogeneity in neurodegenerative disorders, which has been demonstrated predominantly through analyses of well-characterized research cohorts. Despite the known diversity in clinical presentations among patients attending memory clinics, studies exploring neuroanatomical heterogeneity in such clinically diverse groups remain sparse.

Methods: To address this gap, we applied the semi-supervised Heterogeneity through Discriminative Analysis (HYDRA) (Neuroimage 145:346-364 2017) machine learning method to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) (NeuroImage 26:102248 2020) to uncover patterns of neurostructural heterogeneity in memory clinic attendees. Cross-validation was used to assess clustering stability via the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), Silhouette Score, and Calinski-Harabasz Index (CHI). We performed survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier curves and mixed-effects models for longitudinal cognitive data (e.g., memory, executive function, and language assessments) to examine differences in disease progression.

Results: Cross-validation analyses indicated two highly stable subtypes of cognitively impaired individuals (ARI = 0.552), exhibiting significant neuroanatomical differences. Subtype 1, termed the Temporal-Sparing Atrophy (TSA) Subtype, was defined by relatively mild atrophy, especially in temporal areas, with slower cognitive decline and preserved Function across most domains. Subtype 2, termed the Temporal-Parietal Predominated Atrophy (TPPA) Subtype, was marked by notable alterations in areas critically affected in neurodegenerative disorders. These included key areas critical for executive function and memory, such as the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices including the precuneus. Longitudinal analysis of neuroimaging and cognitive data revealed contrasting trajectories. The TSA Subtype demonstrated a gradual decline in cognitive functions over time, particularly in the assessments that are memory-focused tests. Conversely, the TPPA Subtype exhibited a more severe decline in these functions.

Conclusions: This research illustrates that neurodegenerative diseases present a spectrum of structural brain changes rather than uniform pathology, suggesting that future research may benefit from stratified therapeutic approaches and targeted recruitment strategies for clinical trials. By leveraging detailed clinical assessments and longitudinal data, including uncertain diagnoses and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores, this study contributes to better understanding/characterizing memory clinic populations, which could help with optimizing interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信