信息药师协助国内某三级医院GLP-1RA处方审核规则建设

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Li Zhou, Wenjing Duanmu, Feilong Tan, Xi Gu, Hongyi Che, Wenjie Yin
{"title":"信息药师协助国内某三级医院GLP-1RA处方审核规则建设","authors":"Li Zhou, Wenjing Duanmu, Feilong Tan, Xi Gu, Hongyi Che, Wenjie Yin","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13377-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) due to their multifaceted benefits, including glycemic control and cardiovascular protection. However, variations in prescribing practices and potential adverse drug events (ADEs) necessitate standardized prescription review protocols to ensure medication safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and implement GLP-1RA prescription review rules through a multidisciplinary information pharmacist team, evaluate their impact on prescription rationality, and identify ADE risk signals using real-world data, thereby promoting rational clinical medication use and ensuring patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary information pharmacist team was established at a tertiary hospital to develop GLP-1RA prescription review protocols. China-approved GLP-1RA formulations and their clinical parameters were systematically reviewed to establish standardized prescribing criteria, including indications, dosing, and safety considerations. Adverse drug events were analyzed using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data (2018-2023) to identify risk patterns. A dual review system integrating prospective prescription screening and retrospective evaluation was implemented. The intervention's efficacy was evaluated by comparing prescription approval rates pre- (2022) and post-implementation (2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GLP-1RA audit rules represented by liraglutide and semaglutide were successfully created, as well as their potential adverse event signals were successfully obtained. The process of prescription review and medication monitoring enabled them to be put into clinical practice. After the rules were put in place in 2023, the pass rates of GLP-1RA prescriptions significantly improved, and the rationalization of these prescriptions was also notably enhanced compared to the same period in 2022 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized GLP-1RA review rules enhanced prescription rationality and ADE risk awareness, demonstrating the value of information pharmacists in optimizing clinical decision-making. This model is scalable for other high-risk medications, promoting safer drug use and pharmacist-led innovation in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1276"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information pharmacists assist in the construction of GLP-1RA prescription review rules in a tertiary hospital in China.\",\"authors\":\"Li Zhou, Wenjing Duanmu, Feilong Tan, Xi Gu, Hongyi Che, Wenjie Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-13377-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) due to their multifaceted benefits, including glycemic control and cardiovascular protection. However, variations in prescribing practices and potential adverse drug events (ADEs) necessitate standardized prescription review protocols to ensure medication safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and implement GLP-1RA prescription review rules through a multidisciplinary information pharmacist team, evaluate their impact on prescription rationality, and identify ADE risk signals using real-world data, thereby promoting rational clinical medication use and ensuring patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary information pharmacist team was established at a tertiary hospital to develop GLP-1RA prescription review protocols. China-approved GLP-1RA formulations and their clinical parameters were systematically reviewed to establish standardized prescribing criteria, including indications, dosing, and safety considerations. Adverse drug events were analyzed using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data (2018-2023) to identify risk patterns. A dual review system integrating prospective prescription screening and retrospective evaluation was implemented. The intervention's efficacy was evaluated by comparing prescription approval rates pre- (2022) and post-implementation (2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GLP-1RA audit rules represented by liraglutide and semaglutide were successfully created, as well as their potential adverse event signals were successfully obtained. The process of prescription review and medication monitoring enabled them to be put into clinical practice. After the rules were put in place in 2023, the pass rates of GLP-1RA prescriptions significantly improved, and the rationalization of these prescriptions was also notably enhanced compared to the same period in 2022 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized GLP-1RA review rules enhanced prescription rationality and ADE risk awareness, demonstrating the value of information pharmacists in optimizing clinical decision-making. This model is scalable for other high-risk medications, promoting safer drug use and pharmacist-led innovation in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13377-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13377-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)越来越多地用于2型糖尿病(T2DM),因为它们具有多方面的益处,包括血糖控制和心血管保护。然而,处方实践的变化和潜在的药物不良事件(ADEs)需要标准化的处方审查方案,以确保药物的安全性和有效性。目的:本研究旨在通过多学科信息药师团队制定和实施GLP-1RA处方审核规则,评估其对处方合理性的影响,并利用真实数据识别ADE风险信号,从而促进临床合理用药,保障患者安全。方法:在某三级医院组建多学科信息药师团队,制定GLP-1RA处方审查方案。系统审查中国批准的GLP-1RA配方及其临床参数,以建立标准化的处方标准,包括适应症、剂量和安全性考虑。使用FDA不良事件报告系统数据(2018-2023)分析药物不良事件,以确定风险模式。采用前瞻性处方筛选和回顾性评价相结合的双重评价体系。通过比较实施前(2022年)和实施后(2023年)的处方批准率来评估干预措施的疗效。结果:成功建立了以利拉鲁肽、西马鲁肽为代表的GLP-1RA审核规则,并成功获取了其潜在不良事件信号。处方审查和用药监测的过程使其得以投入临床实践。2023年规则实施后,GLP-1RA处方通过率较2022年同期显著提高,处方合理化程度显著提高(p结论:标准化的GLP-1RA审核规则增强了处方合理性和ADE风险意识,体现了信息药师在优化临床决策中的价值。这种模式可扩展到其他高风险药物,促进更安全的药物使用和药剂师主导的医疗保健创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information pharmacists assist in the construction of GLP-1RA prescription review rules in a tertiary hospital in China.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) due to their multifaceted benefits, including glycemic control and cardiovascular protection. However, variations in prescribing practices and potential adverse drug events (ADEs) necessitate standardized prescription review protocols to ensure medication safety and efficacy.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and implement GLP-1RA prescription review rules through a multidisciplinary information pharmacist team, evaluate their impact on prescription rationality, and identify ADE risk signals using real-world data, thereby promoting rational clinical medication use and ensuring patient safety.

Methods: A multidisciplinary information pharmacist team was established at a tertiary hospital to develop GLP-1RA prescription review protocols. China-approved GLP-1RA formulations and their clinical parameters were systematically reviewed to establish standardized prescribing criteria, including indications, dosing, and safety considerations. Adverse drug events were analyzed using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data (2018-2023) to identify risk patterns. A dual review system integrating prospective prescription screening and retrospective evaluation was implemented. The intervention's efficacy was evaluated by comparing prescription approval rates pre- (2022) and post-implementation (2023).

Results: The GLP-1RA audit rules represented by liraglutide and semaglutide were successfully created, as well as their potential adverse event signals were successfully obtained. The process of prescription review and medication monitoring enabled them to be put into clinical practice. After the rules were put in place in 2023, the pass rates of GLP-1RA prescriptions significantly improved, and the rationalization of these prescriptions was also notably enhanced compared to the same period in 2022 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Standardized GLP-1RA review rules enhanced prescription rationality and ADE risk awareness, demonstrating the value of information pharmacists in optimizing clinical decision-making. This model is scalable for other high-risk medications, promoting safer drug use and pharmacist-led innovation in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信