Mirta Dumančić, Guy Heger, Ishai Luz, Maayan Vatarescu, Noam Weizman, Lior Epstein, Tomer Cooks, Lior Arazi
{"title":"扩散α发射器放射治疗:多种肿瘤类型的有效扩散和清除率的体内测量。","authors":"Mirta Dumančić, Guy Heger, Ishai Luz, Maayan Vatarescu, Noam Weizman, Lior Epstein, Tomer Cooks, Lior Arazi","doi":"10.1002/mp.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy (“Alpha-DaRT”) is a new modality that uses alpha particles to treat solid tumors. Alpha-DaRT employs interstitial sources loaded with low activities of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>224</mn>\n </msup>\n <mi>Ra</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$^{224}{\\rm Ra}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, designed to release a chain of short-lived alpha-emitters, which diffuse over a few millimeters around each source. Alpha-DaRT dosimetry is described, to first order, by a framework called the “diffusion–leakage” (DL) model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this work is to estimate the tumor-specific parameters of the DL model from in vivo studies on multiple histological cancer types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Autoradiography studies with phosphor imaging were conducted on 113 tumors in mice from 10 cancer cell lines. An observable, referred to as the “effective diffusion length” <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>f</mi>\n <mi>f</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$L_{eff}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, was extracted from images of histological slices obtained using phosphor screens. The tumor and Alpha-DaRT source activities were measured after excision with a gamma counter to estimate the probability of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>212</mn>\n </msup>\n <mi>Pb</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$^{212}{\\rm Pb}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> clearance from the tumor by the blood, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mi>b</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$P_{leak}(Pb)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The measured values of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>f</mi>\n <mi>f</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$L_{eff}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> are in the range of 0.2–0.7 mm across different tumor types and sizes. <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mi>b</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$P_{leak}(Pb)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is between 10 and 90% for all measured tumors, and it generally decreases in magnitude and spread for larger tumors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The measured values of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>f</mi>\n <mi>f</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$L_{eff}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mi>b</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$P_{leak}(Pb)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and associated dose calculations indicate that hexagonal Alpha-DaRT source lattices of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n <annotation>$\\sim$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>4-mm spacing with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>Ci</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\umu{\\rm Ci}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-scale <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>224</mn>\n </msup>\n <mi>Ra</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$^{224}{\\rm Ra}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> activities can lead to effective coverage of the tumor volume with therapeutic dose levels, with considerable margin to compensate for local variations in diffusion and leakage.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy: In vivo measurements of effective diffusion and clearance rates across multiple tumor types\",\"authors\":\"Mirta Dumančić, Guy Heger, Ishai Luz, Maayan Vatarescu, Noam Weizman, Lior Epstein, Tomer Cooks, Lior Arazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy (“Alpha-DaRT”) is a new modality that uses alpha particles to treat solid tumors. Alpha-DaRT employs interstitial sources loaded with low activities of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mrow></mrow>\\n <mn>224</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mi>Ra</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$^{224}{\\\\rm Ra}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, designed to release a chain of short-lived alpha-emitters, which diffuse over a few millimeters around each source. Alpha-DaRT dosimetry is described, to first order, by a framework called the “diffusion–leakage” (DL) model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this work is to estimate the tumor-specific parameters of the DL model from in vivo studies on multiple histological cancer types.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Autoradiography studies with phosphor imaging were conducted on 113 tumors in mice from 10 cancer cell lines. An observable, referred to as the “effective diffusion length” <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>f</mi>\\n <mi>f</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$L_{eff}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, was extracted from images of histological slices obtained using phosphor screens. The tumor and Alpha-DaRT source activities were measured after excision with a gamma counter to estimate the probability of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mrow></mrow>\\n <mn>212</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mi>Pb</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$^{212}{\\\\rm Pb}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> clearance from the tumor by the blood, <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>P</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>a</mi>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>P</mi>\\n <mi>b</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$P_{leak}(Pb)$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The measured values of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>f</mi>\\n <mi>f</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$L_{eff}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> are in the range of 0.2–0.7 mm across different tumor types and sizes. <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>P</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>a</mi>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>P</mi>\\n <mi>b</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$P_{leak}(Pb)$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> is between 10 and 90% for all measured tumors, and it generally decreases in magnitude and spread for larger tumors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The measured values of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>f</mi>\\n <mi>f</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$L_{eff}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>P</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>a</mi>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>P</mi>\\n <mi>b</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$P_{leak}(Pb)$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and associated dose calculations indicate that hexagonal Alpha-DaRT source lattices of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mo>∼</mo>\\n <annotation>$\\\\sim$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>4-mm spacing with <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>μ</mi>\\n <mi>Ci</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\umu{\\\\rm Ci}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>-scale <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mrow></mrow>\\n <mn>224</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mi>Ra</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$^{224}{\\\\rm Ra}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> activities can lead to effective coverage of the tumor volume with therapeutic dose levels, with considerable margin to compensate for local variations in diffusion and leakage.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.70052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.70052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy: In vivo measurements of effective diffusion and clearance rates across multiple tumor types
Background
Diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy (“Alpha-DaRT”) is a new modality that uses alpha particles to treat solid tumors. Alpha-DaRT employs interstitial sources loaded with low activities of , designed to release a chain of short-lived alpha-emitters, which diffuse over a few millimeters around each source. Alpha-DaRT dosimetry is described, to first order, by a framework called the “diffusion–leakage” (DL) model.
Purpose
The aim of this work is to estimate the tumor-specific parameters of the DL model from in vivo studies on multiple histological cancer types.
Methods
Autoradiography studies with phosphor imaging were conducted on 113 tumors in mice from 10 cancer cell lines. An observable, referred to as the “effective diffusion length” , was extracted from images of histological slices obtained using phosphor screens. The tumor and Alpha-DaRT source activities were measured after excision with a gamma counter to estimate the probability of clearance from the tumor by the blood, .
Results
The measured values of are in the range of 0.2–0.7 mm across different tumor types and sizes. is between 10 and 90% for all measured tumors, and it generally decreases in magnitude and spread for larger tumors.
Conclusions
The measured values of and and associated dose calculations indicate that hexagonal Alpha-DaRT source lattices of 4-mm spacing with -scale activities can lead to effective coverage of the tumor volume with therapeutic dose levels, with considerable margin to compensate for local variations in diffusion and leakage.
期刊介绍:
Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments
Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.