Noa Mascato Fontaíña, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Guadalupe García, Joseph S Ross, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Lucía Martin-Gisbert
{"title":"确定从造纸厂撤回论文的期刊的共同模式:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Noa Mascato Fontaíña, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Guadalupe García, Joseph S Ross, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Lucía Martin-Gisbert","doi":"10.1186/s41073-025-00177-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize journals that published and retracted articles retracted for having originated from paper mills and examine associations between paper mill retraction frequency and journal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retraction Watch database was used to identify papers retracted due to originating from paper mills and journals, between January 2020 and December 2022. Data on the total number of articles and journal characteristics were obtained from Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports. Journals were classified based on the frequency of retracted paper mill papers (1, 2-9, ≥ 10 retractions). Logistic regressions were conducted to explore associations between retraction frequency and journal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-two journals were identified that retracted 2,051 articles from paper mills. Among these, 71 (50%) journals had 1 retraction, 36 (25.4%) had 2-9 retractions, and 35 (24.6%) had ≥ 10 retractions; 4 (2.8%) journals had > 100 retractions. These journals, regardless of paper mill retraction number, were mainly in the second (35.2%) and third (29.6%) quartiles by impact factor. Medicine and health emerged as the predominant subject area, comprising 61.2% of all indexed journal categories. Comparing journals with one retraction to those with ten or more, the proportion of open access articles (72.6% vs. 19.2%) and median editorial times (86 vs. 116 days) differed across groups, although these differences were not statistically significant. An inverse correlation was observed between the proportion of paper mill papers and original articles (Spearman's Rho = -0.1891, 95%CI -0.370 to -0.008). Logistic regressions found no significant association between paper mill retraction number and other variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that paper mill retractions are concentrated in a small number of journals with common characteristics: high open access rates, intermediate impact factor quartiles, a high volume of citable items, and classification in medicine and health categories. Short editorial times may indicate a higher presence of paper mill publications, but more research is needed to examine this factor in depth, as well as the possible influence of acceptance rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":74682,"journal":{"name":"Research integrity and peer review","volume":"10 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Noa Mascato Fontaíña, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Guadalupe García, Joseph S Ross, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Lucía Martin-Gisbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41073-025-00177-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize journals that published and retracted articles retracted for having originated from paper mills and examine associations between paper mill retraction frequency and journal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retraction Watch database was used to identify papers retracted due to originating from paper mills and journals, between January 2020 and December 2022. Data on the total number of articles and journal characteristics were obtained from Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports. Journals were classified based on the frequency of retracted paper mill papers (1, 2-9, ≥ 10 retractions). Logistic regressions were conducted to explore associations between retraction frequency and journal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-two journals were identified that retracted 2,051 articles from paper mills. Among these, 71 (50%) journals had 1 retraction, 36 (25.4%) had 2-9 retractions, and 35 (24.6%) had ≥ 10 retractions; 4 (2.8%) journals had > 100 retractions. These journals, regardless of paper mill retraction number, were mainly in the second (35.2%) and third (29.6%) quartiles by impact factor. Medicine and health emerged as the predominant subject area, comprising 61.2% of all indexed journal categories. Comparing journals with one retraction to those with ten or more, the proportion of open access articles (72.6% vs. 19.2%) and median editorial times (86 vs. 116 days) differed across groups, although these differences were not statistically significant. An inverse correlation was observed between the proportion of paper mill papers and original articles (Spearman's Rho = -0.1891, 95%CI -0.370 to -0.008). Logistic regressions found no significant association between paper mill retraction number and other variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that paper mill retractions are concentrated in a small number of journals with common characteristics: high open access rates, intermediate impact factor quartiles, a high volume of citable items, and classification in medicine and health categories. Short editorial times may indicate a higher presence of paper mill publications, but more research is needed to examine this factor in depth, as well as the possible influence of acceptance rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research integrity and peer review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487316/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research integrity and peer review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00177-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research integrity and peer review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00177-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究发表和撤回论文的期刊的特征,并研究造纸厂撤回论文的频率与期刊特征之间的关系。方法:利用撤稿观察数据库,对2020年1月至2022年12月期间因来自造纸厂和期刊而被撤稿的论文进行检索。文章总数和期刊特征数据来自Web of Science和journal Citation Reports。根据论文被撤稿的频率(1、2-9、≥10)对期刊进行分类。运用逻辑回归来探讨撤稿频率与期刊特征之间的关系。结果:共鉴定出142种期刊,撤稿论文2051篇。其中撤稿1篇71篇(50%),撤稿2-9篇36篇(25.4%),撤稿≥10篇35篇(24.6%);4份(2.8%)期刊被撤稿100次。这些期刊,无论造纸厂撤回多少,主要分布在影响因子的第二(35.2%)和第三(29.6%)四分位数。医学和健康成为主要的学科领域,占所有索引期刊类别的61.2%。将一次撤稿的期刊与10次或以上撤稿的期刊进行比较,开放获取文章的比例(72.6% vs. 19.2%)和中位编辑时间(86 vs. 116天)在两组之间存在差异,尽管这些差异在统计学上并不显著。造纸厂论文和原创文章的比例呈负相关(Spearman’s Rho = -0.1891, 95%CI为-0.370 ~ -0.008)。Logistic回归分析发现,纸厂撤稿数与其他变量之间无显著相关性。结论:研究表明,造纸厂论文撤稿集中在少数期刊上,这些期刊具有开放获取率高、影响因子四分位数中等、可引用条目数量多、医学和卫生类分类等共同特点。编辑时间短可能表明造纸厂出版物较多,但需要更多的研究来深入研究这一因素,以及接受率的可能影响。
Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study.
Objectives: To characterize journals that published and retracted articles retracted for having originated from paper mills and examine associations between paper mill retraction frequency and journal characteristics.
Methods: Retraction Watch database was used to identify papers retracted due to originating from paper mills and journals, between January 2020 and December 2022. Data on the total number of articles and journal characteristics were obtained from Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports. Journals were classified based on the frequency of retracted paper mill papers (1, 2-9, ≥ 10 retractions). Logistic regressions were conducted to explore associations between retraction frequency and journal characteristics.
Results: One hundred forty-two journals were identified that retracted 2,051 articles from paper mills. Among these, 71 (50%) journals had 1 retraction, 36 (25.4%) had 2-9 retractions, and 35 (24.6%) had ≥ 10 retractions; 4 (2.8%) journals had > 100 retractions. These journals, regardless of paper mill retraction number, were mainly in the second (35.2%) and third (29.6%) quartiles by impact factor. Medicine and health emerged as the predominant subject area, comprising 61.2% of all indexed journal categories. Comparing journals with one retraction to those with ten or more, the proportion of open access articles (72.6% vs. 19.2%) and median editorial times (86 vs. 116 days) differed across groups, although these differences were not statistically significant. An inverse correlation was observed between the proportion of paper mill papers and original articles (Spearman's Rho = -0.1891, 95%CI -0.370 to -0.008). Logistic regressions found no significant association between paper mill retraction number and other variables.
Conclusion: This study suggests that paper mill retractions are concentrated in a small number of journals with common characteristics: high open access rates, intermediate impact factor quartiles, a high volume of citable items, and classification in medicine and health categories. Short editorial times may indicate a higher presence of paper mill publications, but more research is needed to examine this factor in depth, as well as the possible influence of acceptance rates.