12周运动计划(Motum)对慢性非特异性腰痛患者功能结局的可接受性:一项混合方法的试点研究

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Alice Farmer , Saravana Kumar , Harry Truong , Jacinta Brinsley
{"title":"12周运动计划(Motum)对慢性非特异性腰痛患者功能结局的可接受性:一项混合方法的试点研究","authors":"Alice Farmer ,&nbsp;Saravana Kumar ,&nbsp;Harry Truong ,&nbsp;Jacinta Brinsley","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a major cause of disability globally. Due to the multifactorial nature of CNSLBP, non-pharmacological management such as exercise therapy, has been recommended as a first-line treatment. This pilot study examined the acceptability and clinical impact of a novel physiotherapist-led movement-based intervention for people with CNSLBP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methods study design was used. Twenty-nine adults with CNSLBP were allocated to a 12-week movement-based program (Motum) or waitlist control. The intervention comprised 12 sessions based on fundamental movement patterns and motor control principles. The primary outcome was acceptability and secondary measures were balance, pain, function, self-efficacy and kinesiophobia. Semi-structured interviews explored participants experiences of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The intervention was acceptable to participants with all sub-domains (affective attitude, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, self-efficacy, and ethicality) scoring ‘highly acceptable’ (<em>p</em> &lt; .001), except burden which scored ‘acceptable’ (<em>p</em> &lt; .02). The intervention demonstrated large positive changes for improving fear avoidance of movement (Hedges <em>g</em> = .92) and balance (<em>g</em> = 1.04) and smaller positive effects on pain and function (<em>g</em> = .62) and self-efficacy (<em>g</em> = .23), compared to controls. Themes emerging from qualitative data with 10 participants were: 1) acceptability of program structure; 2) positive impacts attributed to the intervention; and 3) barriers to engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Motum was an acceptable intervention and demonstrated positive impacts across a range of clinical outcomes. While these findings are encouraging, further research through mature study designs (such as randomised controlled trials) are required to substantiate these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 103424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of a 12-week movement program (Motum) to address functional outcomes in people with chronic non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Alice Farmer ,&nbsp;Saravana Kumar ,&nbsp;Harry Truong ,&nbsp;Jacinta Brinsley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a major cause of disability globally. Due to the multifactorial nature of CNSLBP, non-pharmacological management such as exercise therapy, has been recommended as a first-line treatment. This pilot study examined the acceptability and clinical impact of a novel physiotherapist-led movement-based intervention for people with CNSLBP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methods study design was used. Twenty-nine adults with CNSLBP were allocated to a 12-week movement-based program (Motum) or waitlist control. The intervention comprised 12 sessions based on fundamental movement patterns and motor control principles. The primary outcome was acceptability and secondary measures were balance, pain, function, self-efficacy and kinesiophobia. Semi-structured interviews explored participants experiences of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The intervention was acceptable to participants with all sub-domains (affective attitude, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, self-efficacy, and ethicality) scoring ‘highly acceptable’ (<em>p</em> &lt; .001), except burden which scored ‘acceptable’ (<em>p</em> &lt; .02). The intervention demonstrated large positive changes for improving fear avoidance of movement (Hedges <em>g</em> = .92) and balance (<em>g</em> = 1.04) and smaller positive effects on pain and function (<em>g</em> = .62) and self-efficacy (<em>g</em> = .23), compared to controls. Themes emerging from qualitative data with 10 participants were: 1) acceptability of program structure; 2) positive impacts attributed to the intervention; and 3) barriers to engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Motum was an acceptable intervention and demonstrated positive impacts across a range of clinical outcomes. While these findings are encouraging, further research through mature study designs (such as randomised controlled trials) are required to substantiate these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781225001729\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781225001729","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性非特异性腰痛(CNSLBP)是全球致残的主要原因。由于CNSLBP的多因素性质,非药物管理如运动治疗,已被推荐作为一线治疗。本初步研究考察了一种新的物理治疗师主导的基于运动的CNSLBP患者干预的可接受性和临床影响。方法:采用混合方法设计研究。29名患有CNSLBP的成年人被分配到一个为期12周的基于运动的项目(Motum)或候补名单控制。干预包括基于基本运动模式和运动控制原理的12个疗程。主要指标是可接受性,次要指标是平衡、疼痛、功能、自我效能和运动恐惧症。半结构化访谈探讨了参与者对干预的体验。结果:所有子领域(情感态度、感知有效性、干预一致性、机会成本、自我效能和道德)得分为“高度可接受”的参与者都可以接受干预(p结论:Motum是一种可接受的干预,并在一系列临床结果中表现出积极的影响。虽然这些发现令人鼓舞,但需要通过成熟的研究设计(如随机对照试验)进行进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability of a 12-week movement program (Motum) to address functional outcomes in people with chronic non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods pilot study

Introduction

Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a major cause of disability globally. Due to the multifactorial nature of CNSLBP, non-pharmacological management such as exercise therapy, has been recommended as a first-line treatment. This pilot study examined the acceptability and clinical impact of a novel physiotherapist-led movement-based intervention for people with CNSLBP.

Methods

A mixed-methods study design was used. Twenty-nine adults with CNSLBP were allocated to a 12-week movement-based program (Motum) or waitlist control. The intervention comprised 12 sessions based on fundamental movement patterns and motor control principles. The primary outcome was acceptability and secondary measures were balance, pain, function, self-efficacy and kinesiophobia. Semi-structured interviews explored participants experiences of the intervention.

Results

The intervention was acceptable to participants with all sub-domains (affective attitude, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, self-efficacy, and ethicality) scoring ‘highly acceptable’ (p < .001), except burden which scored ‘acceptable’ (p < .02). The intervention demonstrated large positive changes for improving fear avoidance of movement (Hedges g = .92) and balance (g = 1.04) and smaller positive effects on pain and function (g = .62) and self-efficacy (g = .23), compared to controls. Themes emerging from qualitative data with 10 participants were: 1) acceptability of program structure; 2) positive impacts attributed to the intervention; and 3) barriers to engagement.

Conclusion

Motum was an acceptable intervention and demonstrated positive impacts across a range of clinical outcomes. While these findings are encouraging, further research through mature study designs (such as randomised controlled trials) are required to substantiate these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信