丹麦弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤不同治疗方案的总费用——一项真实世界数据分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Christian Graves Beck, Martin Lucas Jørgensen, Maya Friis Kjaergaard, Søren Ramme Bro, Tove Holm-Larsen
{"title":"丹麦弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤不同治疗方案的总费用——一项真实世界数据分析。","authors":"Christian Graves Beck, Martin Lucas Jørgensen, Maya Friis Kjaergaard, Søren Ramme Bro, Tove Holm-Larsen","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01843-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cure rate is high after first-line treatment, however, prognosis for relapse/refractory patients remains poor. Multiple treatments to DLBCL have recently been approved, therefore it is important to understand the underlying total costs of the different treatment lines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the total healthcare costs per line of DLBCL treatment (first-line (1LoT), second-line (2LoT), third-line (3LoT), including best supportive care (BSC)), and to estimate patients' labour market attachment and sickness benefit level.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A nationwide real-world registry study covering the Danish DLBCL patients diagnosed 2012-2021 (August) from the National Lymphoma Registry (LYFO). Data were linked with other national registries to estimate the total costs per treatment line. Additionally, costs per line were adjusted to costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4,159 DLBCL patients were included. Average progression-free time before progression to next LoT or being cured decreased from 2 years (1LoT) to half a year (3LoT + BSC). Average total healthcare costs per patient were estimated to €51,660 (1LoT), €59,094 (2LoT) and €35,808 (3LoT + BSC). Adjusting for progression-free time periods, costs per PPPM increased with later treatment lines. Patients' labour market attachment was in general low, and weeks of sickness benefit increased with later treatment lines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that the total costs and weeks of sickness benefit increase with later treatment lines suggesting that more effective first-line treatment options not only have an importance for the patient prognosis but also may have an economic advantage for the healthcare sector and society.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total costs of different lines of treatment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark - a real-world data analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Graves Beck, Martin Lucas Jørgensen, Maya Friis Kjaergaard, Søren Ramme Bro, Tove Holm-Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-025-01843-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cure rate is high after first-line treatment, however, prognosis for relapse/refractory patients remains poor. Multiple treatments to DLBCL have recently been approved, therefore it is important to understand the underlying total costs of the different treatment lines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the total healthcare costs per line of DLBCL treatment (first-line (1LoT), second-line (2LoT), third-line (3LoT), including best supportive care (BSC)), and to estimate patients' labour market attachment and sickness benefit level.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A nationwide real-world registry study covering the Danish DLBCL patients diagnosed 2012-2021 (August) from the National Lymphoma Registry (LYFO). Data were linked with other national registries to estimate the total costs per treatment line. Additionally, costs per line were adjusted to costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4,159 DLBCL patients were included. Average progression-free time before progression to next LoT or being cured decreased from 2 years (1LoT) to half a year (3LoT + BSC). Average total healthcare costs per patient were estimated to €51,660 (1LoT), €59,094 (2LoT) and €35,808 (3LoT + BSC). Adjusting for progression-free time periods, costs per PPPM increased with later treatment lines. Patients' labour market attachment was in general low, and weeks of sickness benefit increased with later treatment lines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that the total costs and weeks of sickness benefit increase with later treatment lines suggesting that more effective first-line treatment options not only have an importance for the patient prognosis but also may have an economic advantage for the healthcare sector and society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01843-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01843-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是最常见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤类型。一线治疗治愈率高,但复发/难治性患者预后较差。最近已经批准了多种治疗DLBCL的方法,因此了解不同治疗方案的潜在总成本是很重要的。目的:探讨DLBCL治疗(一线(1LoT),二线(2LoT),三线(3LoT),包括最佳支持护理(BSC))的每条线的总医疗费用,并估计患者的劳动力市场依恋和疾病福利水平。方法:一项涵盖2012-2021年(8月)从国家淋巴瘤登记处(LYFO)诊断的丹麦DLBCL患者的全国现实登记研究。数据与其他国家登记处相联系,以估计每条治疗线的总费用。此外,每行费用调整为每个病人每月费用(PPPM)。结果:纳入4159例DLBCL患者。进展到下一个LoT或治愈前的平均无进展时间从2年(1LoT)减少到半年(3LoT + BSC)。每位患者的平均总医疗成本估计为51,660欧元(1LoT)、59,094欧元(2LoT)和35,808欧元(3LoT + BSC)。根据无进展时间进行调整后,随着治疗线的延长,每PPPM的成本增加。患者对劳动力市场的依恋程度普遍较低,随着治疗线的延长,每周的疾病福利增加。结论:该研究表明,总费用和疾病周收益随着治疗线的延长而增加,这表明更有效的一线治疗方案不仅对患者预后有重要意义,而且可能对医疗保健部门和社会具有经济优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Total costs of different lines of treatment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark - a real-world data analysis.

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cure rate is high after first-line treatment, however, prognosis for relapse/refractory patients remains poor. Multiple treatments to DLBCL have recently been approved, therefore it is important to understand the underlying total costs of the different treatment lines.

Objective: To investigate the total healthcare costs per line of DLBCL treatment (first-line (1LoT), second-line (2LoT), third-line (3LoT), including best supportive care (BSC)), and to estimate patients' labour market attachment and sickness benefit level.

Method: A nationwide real-world registry study covering the Danish DLBCL patients diagnosed 2012-2021 (August) from the National Lymphoma Registry (LYFO). Data were linked with other national registries to estimate the total costs per treatment line. Additionally, costs per line were adjusted to costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM).

Results: 4,159 DLBCL patients were included. Average progression-free time before progression to next LoT or being cured decreased from 2 years (1LoT) to half a year (3LoT + BSC). Average total healthcare costs per patient were estimated to €51,660 (1LoT), €59,094 (2LoT) and €35,808 (3LoT + BSC). Adjusting for progression-free time periods, costs per PPPM increased with later treatment lines. Patients' labour market attachment was in general low, and weeks of sickness benefit increased with later treatment lines.

Conclusion: The study suggests that the total costs and weeks of sickness benefit increase with later treatment lines suggesting that more effective first-line treatment options not only have an importance for the patient prognosis but also may have an economic advantage for the healthcare sector and society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信