Dimas Panca Andhika, Tarmono Djojodimedjo, Furqan Hidayatullah, Zakaria Aulia Rahman, Ilham Akbar Rahman, Prima Ardiansah Surya, Mohammad Ayodhia Soebadi
{"title":"曲安奈德在尿道切开后应用降低尿道狭窄复发率:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Dimas Panca Andhika, Tarmono Djojodimedjo, Furqan Hidayatullah, Zakaria Aulia Rahman, Ilham Akbar Rahman, Prima Ardiansah Surya, Mohammad Ayodhia Soebadi","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2025.14203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urethral stricture, characterized by urethral narrowing due to fibrosis and scar tissue, is a common urological condition. It occurs in about 200 per 100,000 people, with increasing incidence over the past 50 years. Internal urethrotomy is commonly performed for short strictures, but its high recurrence rate has led to the exploration of adjunctive treatments like adjunct of triamcinolone application. This study aimed to analyze the effect of triamcinolone as adjunctive therapy for internal urethrotomy on reducing urethral stricture recurrence in urethral stricture patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PUBMED, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline, and the protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020202254).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs, including 373 urethral stricture patients, were eligible for this study. Pooled results of the included studies showed a significant difference between the triamcinolone and control groups, indicating a lower recurrence rate in the triamcinolone group (OR = 0.49 95% CI 0.31-0.77, p=0.002). A significant difference was seen in the ointment with clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) intervention subgroup (OR = 0.47 CI 95% 0.26-0.82, p=0.009), but not in the submucosal injection subgroup (p>0.05). The treatment and control groups had similar maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) at six and twelve months (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Triamcinolone ointment with CIC reduced urethral stricture recurrence following internal urethrotomy, whereas submucosal injection did not. Both treatments do not increase the maximum urinary flow rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":"97 3","pages":"14203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triamcinolone application following internal urethrotomy for reducing urethral stricture recurrence rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Dimas Panca Andhika, Tarmono Djojodimedjo, Furqan Hidayatullah, Zakaria Aulia Rahman, Ilham Akbar Rahman, Prima Ardiansah Surya, Mohammad Ayodhia Soebadi\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/aiua.2025.14203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urethral stricture, characterized by urethral narrowing due to fibrosis and scar tissue, is a common urological condition. It occurs in about 200 per 100,000 people, with increasing incidence over the past 50 years. Internal urethrotomy is commonly performed for short strictures, but its high recurrence rate has led to the exploration of adjunctive treatments like adjunct of triamcinolone application. This study aimed to analyze the effect of triamcinolone as adjunctive therapy for internal urethrotomy on reducing urethral stricture recurrence in urethral stricture patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PUBMED, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline, and the protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020202254).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs, including 373 urethral stricture patients, were eligible for this study. Pooled results of the included studies showed a significant difference between the triamcinolone and control groups, indicating a lower recurrence rate in the triamcinolone group (OR = 0.49 95% CI 0.31-0.77, p=0.002). A significant difference was seen in the ointment with clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) intervention subgroup (OR = 0.47 CI 95% 0.26-0.82, p=0.009), but not in the submucosal injection subgroup (p>0.05). The treatment and control groups had similar maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) at six and twelve months (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Triamcinolone ointment with CIC reduced urethral stricture recurrence following internal urethrotomy, whereas submucosal injection did not. Both treatments do not increase the maximum urinary flow rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia\",\"volume\":\"97 3\",\"pages\":\"14203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.14203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.14203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:尿道狭窄是一种常见的泌尿系统疾病,其特征是尿道因纤维化和瘢痕组织而变窄。每10万人中约有200人患此病,过去50年发病率不断上升。短段狭窄常行尿道内切开术,但其高复发率促使人们探索辅助治疗,如曲安奈德辅助应用。本研究旨在分析曲安奈德作为内尿道切开术辅助治疗对尿道狭窄患者减少尿道狭窄复发的影响。方法:系统检索PUBMED、ScienceDirect和谷歌Scholar。本综述按照PRISMA指南进行,该方案已在PROSPERO数据库中注册(CRD42020202254)。结果:6项随机对照试验,包括373例尿道狭窄患者纳入本研究。纳入研究的汇总结果显示,曲安奈德组与对照组的复发率有显著差异,曲安奈德组的复发率较低(OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.77, p=0.002)。在软膏加清洁间歇置管(CIC)干预亚组(OR = 0.47 CI 95% 0.26-0.82, p=0.009)差异有统计学意义,但在粘膜下注射亚组中差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。治疗组和对照组在第6个月和第12个月的最大尿流率(Qmax)相似(p < 0.05)。结论:曲安奈德软膏联合CIC可减少内尿道切开术后尿道狭窄的复发,而粘膜下注射则无此作用。两种治疗都不能增加最大尿流率。
Triamcinolone application following internal urethrotomy for reducing urethral stricture recurrence rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Introduction: Urethral stricture, characterized by urethral narrowing due to fibrosis and scar tissue, is a common urological condition. It occurs in about 200 per 100,000 people, with increasing incidence over the past 50 years. Internal urethrotomy is commonly performed for short strictures, but its high recurrence rate has led to the exploration of adjunctive treatments like adjunct of triamcinolone application. This study aimed to analyze the effect of triamcinolone as adjunctive therapy for internal urethrotomy on reducing urethral stricture recurrence in urethral stricture patients.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PUBMED, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline, and the protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020202254).
Results: Six RCTs, including 373 urethral stricture patients, were eligible for this study. Pooled results of the included studies showed a significant difference between the triamcinolone and control groups, indicating a lower recurrence rate in the triamcinolone group (OR = 0.49 95% CI 0.31-0.77, p=0.002). A significant difference was seen in the ointment with clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) intervention subgroup (OR = 0.47 CI 95% 0.26-0.82, p=0.009), but not in the submucosal injection subgroup (p>0.05). The treatment and control groups had similar maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) at six and twelve months (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Triamcinolone ointment with CIC reduced urethral stricture recurrence following internal urethrotomy, whereas submucosal injection did not. Both treatments do not increase the maximum urinary flow rate.