汉语发展性语言障碍儿童与孤独症伴语言障碍儿童关系从句特征不充分的比较研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jiao DU , Xiaowei HE , Haopeng YU
{"title":"汉语发展性语言障碍儿童与孤独症伴语言障碍儿童关系从句特征不充分的比较研究。","authors":"Jiao DU ,&nbsp;Xiaowei HE ,&nbsp;Haopeng YU","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined how Mandarin-speaking children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and Autism Plus Language Impairment (ALI) comprehend relative clauses (RCs), focusing on potential differences between subject and object RCs across these clinical populations. Both clinical groups demonstrated significant difficulties with RC comprehension, producing comparable error types: thematic role reversals, middle errors, and simple sentence errors. However, distinct performance patterns emerged: children with DLD showed better performance on subject RCs than object RCs, while children with ALI exhibited uniformly low performance across both RC types, suggesting potentially different underlying mechanisms. In line with the Edge Feature Underspecification Hypothesis, our findings suggest that the observed asymmetry in RC comprehension among children with DLD, as well as the error patterns across both clinical groups, may be explained by underspecified edge features.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 106574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The feature underspecification in relative clauses: A comparative study on mandarin-speaking children with developmental language disorder and children with autism plus language impairment\",\"authors\":\"Jiao DU ,&nbsp;Xiaowei HE ,&nbsp;Haopeng YU\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examined how Mandarin-speaking children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and Autism Plus Language Impairment (ALI) comprehend relative clauses (RCs), focusing on potential differences between subject and object RCs across these clinical populations. Both clinical groups demonstrated significant difficulties with RC comprehension, producing comparable error types: thematic role reversals, middle errors, and simple sentence errors. However, distinct performance patterns emerged: children with DLD showed better performance on subject RCs than object RCs, while children with ALI exhibited uniformly low performance across both RC types, suggesting potentially different underlying mechanisms. In line with the Edge Feature Underspecification Hypothesis, our findings suggest that the observed asymmetry in RC comprehension among children with DLD, as well as the error patterns across both clinical groups, may be explained by underspecified edge features.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992425000814\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992425000814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了患有发展性语言障碍(DLD)和自闭症加语言障碍(ALI)的普通话儿童如何理解关系从句(rc),重点研究了这些临床人群中主体和客体rc之间的潜在差异。两个临床组在RC理解上都表现出明显的困难,产生类似的错误类型:主题角色颠倒、中间错误和简单句子错误。然而,不同的表现模式出现了:DLD儿童在主体RC上的表现优于客体RC,而ALI儿童在两种RC类型上的表现一致较低,这表明潜在的机制不同。根据边缘特征不足假说,我们的研究结果表明,在DLD儿童中观察到的RC理解的不对称性,以及两个临床组的错误模式,可以用边缘特征不足来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The feature underspecification in relative clauses: A comparative study on mandarin-speaking children with developmental language disorder and children with autism plus language impairment
This study examined how Mandarin-speaking children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and Autism Plus Language Impairment (ALI) comprehend relative clauses (RCs), focusing on potential differences between subject and object RCs across these clinical populations. Both clinical groups demonstrated significant difficulties with RC comprehension, producing comparable error types: thematic role reversals, middle errors, and simple sentence errors. However, distinct performance patterns emerged: children with DLD showed better performance on subject RCs than object RCs, while children with ALI exhibited uniformly low performance across both RC types, suggesting potentially different underlying mechanisms. In line with the Edge Feature Underspecification Hypothesis, our findings suggest that the observed asymmetry in RC comprehension among children with DLD, as well as the error patterns across both clinical groups, may be explained by underspecified edge features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信