转介到联合卫生专业人员的人与痴呆症:从两个澳大利亚初级卫生网络的全科医生数据的分析。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Den-Ching A Lee, Taya A Collyer, Grant Russell, Nadine E Andrew, Claire M C O'Connor, Keith D Hill, Kate Swaffer, Natasha Layton, Velandai Srikanth, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Lee-Fay Low, Yalchin Oytam, Galina Daraganova, Catherine Devanny, Michele L Callisaya
{"title":"转介到联合卫生专业人员的人与痴呆症:从两个澳大利亚初级卫生网络的全科医生数据的分析。","authors":"Den-Ching A Lee, Taya A Collyer, Grant Russell, Nadine E Andrew, Claire M C O'Connor, Keith D Hill, Kate Swaffer, Natasha Layton, Velandai Srikanth, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Lee-Fay Low, Yalchin Oytam, Galina Daraganova, Catherine Devanny, Michele L Callisaya","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine general practitioners' (GPs) referral patterns to allied health services for people with dementia compared with those without dementia across two large Australian Primary Health Networks (PHNs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice data. Logistic regression was used to compare odds of allied health referrals, adjusting for age, sex and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>De-identified patient and episode activity data from 537 GP practices across two PHNs in Australia between 2018 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Data from 1 153 304 patients and 28 667 517 GP episodes of care were analysed. After merging records, 693 328 unique patients were identified, including 16 610 patients with dementia. Subcohorts included patients with dementia, stroke, Parkinson's disease and combinations of these conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dementia cohort (n=16 610) had a similar overall allied health referral rate (36.1%) to the control cohort (n=48 977) (35.4%). Patients with dementia only were significantly less likely to receive any allied health referral compared with those with stroke (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80; p<0.001) or Parkinson's disease (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78; p<0.001). Those with dementia and stroke were also less likely to receive referrals than those with stroke only (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.82; p<0.001). No significant difference was found between dementia with Parkinson's and Parkinson's only groups (p=0.48). Patients with dementia were consistently less likely to be referred to key allied health services (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite strong evidence supporting allied health interventions for dementia, referral rates remain comparatively low. Enhancing GP referral resources and education, integrating dementia-specific care pathways and implementing supportive policy changes are needed to improve access and equity in dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Referrals to allied health professionals for people with dementia: an analysis of general practitioner data from two Australian primary health networks.\",\"authors\":\"Den-Ching A Lee, Taya A Collyer, Grant Russell, Nadine E Andrew, Claire M C O'Connor, Keith D Hill, Kate Swaffer, Natasha Layton, Velandai Srikanth, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Lee-Fay Low, Yalchin Oytam, Galina Daraganova, Catherine Devanny, Michele L Callisaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/fmch-2025-003470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine general practitioners' (GPs) referral patterns to allied health services for people with dementia compared with those without dementia across two large Australian Primary Health Networks (PHNs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice data. Logistic regression was used to compare odds of allied health referrals, adjusting for age, sex and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>De-identified patient and episode activity data from 537 GP practices across two PHNs in Australia between 2018 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Data from 1 153 304 patients and 28 667 517 GP episodes of care were analysed. After merging records, 693 328 unique patients were identified, including 16 610 patients with dementia. Subcohorts included patients with dementia, stroke, Parkinson's disease and combinations of these conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dementia cohort (n=16 610) had a similar overall allied health referral rate (36.1%) to the control cohort (n=48 977) (35.4%). Patients with dementia only were significantly less likely to receive any allied health referral compared with those with stroke (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80; p<0.001) or Parkinson's disease (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78; p<0.001). Those with dementia and stroke were also less likely to receive referrals than those with stroke only (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.82; p<0.001). No significant difference was found between dementia with Parkinson's and Parkinson's only groups (p=0.48). Patients with dementia were consistently less likely to be referred to key allied health services (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite strong evidence supporting allied health interventions for dementia, referral rates remain comparatively low. Enhancing GP referral resources and education, integrating dementia-specific care pathways and implementing supportive policy changes are needed to improve access and equity in dementia care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine and Community Health\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2025-003470\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2025-003470","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过两个大型澳大利亚初级卫生网络(phn),研究全科医生(gp)向联合卫生服务机构推荐痴呆症患者和非痴呆症患者的模式。设计:一项回顾性队列研究,使用常规收集的全科实践数据。在调整年龄、性别和社会经济地位后,采用Logistic回归比较联合健康转诊的几率。背景:2018年至2023年期间,澳大利亚两家phn的537名全科医生实践中未识别的患者和发作活动数据。参与者:分析了来自1 153 304名患者和28 667 517次GP护理的数据。合并记录后,确定了693 328名独特患者,其中包括16 610名痴呆症患者。亚队列包括患有痴呆症、中风、帕金森病和这些疾病组合的患者。结果:痴呆队列(n=16 610)与对照队列(n=48 977)总体联合健康转诊率(35.4%)相似(36.1%)。与卒中患者相比,仅患有痴呆的患者接受联合健康转诊的可能性显著降低(调整OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.72至0.80;结论:尽管有强有力的证据支持联合健康干预痴呆,转诊率仍然相对较低。需要加强全科医生转诊资源和教育,整合针对痴呆症的护理途径,并实施支持性政策改革,以改善痴呆症护理的可及性和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Referrals to allied health professionals for people with dementia: an analysis of general practitioner data from two Australian primary health networks.

Objective: To examine general practitioners' (GPs) referral patterns to allied health services for people with dementia compared with those without dementia across two large Australian Primary Health Networks (PHNs).

Design: A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice data. Logistic regression was used to compare odds of allied health referrals, adjusting for age, sex and socioeconomic status.

Setting: De-identified patient and episode activity data from 537 GP practices across two PHNs in Australia between 2018 and 2023.

Participants: Data from 1 153 304 patients and 28 667 517 GP episodes of care were analysed. After merging records, 693 328 unique patients were identified, including 16 610 patients with dementia. Subcohorts included patients with dementia, stroke, Parkinson's disease and combinations of these conditions.

Results: The dementia cohort (n=16 610) had a similar overall allied health referral rate (36.1%) to the control cohort (n=48 977) (35.4%). Patients with dementia only were significantly less likely to receive any allied health referral compared with those with stroke (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80; p<0.001) or Parkinson's disease (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78; p<0.001). Those with dementia and stroke were also less likely to receive referrals than those with stroke only (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.82; p<0.001). No significant difference was found between dementia with Parkinson's and Parkinson's only groups (p=0.48). Patients with dementia were consistently less likely to be referred to key allied health services (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Despite strong evidence supporting allied health interventions for dementia, referral rates remain comparatively low. Enhancing GP referral resources and education, integrating dementia-specific care pathways and implementing supportive policy changes are needed to improve access and equity in dementia care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信